On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:52:00PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > If you want to specify which of a set of real packages should be the
> > default to satisfy a particular dependency on a virtual package, you
> > should list the real package as an alternative before the virtual o
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 10:31:43AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi KEN,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kenneth Pronovici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:10 AM
> > To: Ola Lundqvist; debian-java@lists.debian.org;
> > debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Hi
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:10:04AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > > You should list the working package first :
> > >
> > > working-java | java-common
> >
> > And it should look like this instead.
> >
> > working-jvm | java-virtual-machine.
>
> Ok. I will change it to:
>
>Depen
> If you want to specify which of a set of real packages should be the
> default to satisfy a particular dependency on a virtual package, you
> should list the real package as an alternative before the virtual one.
>
> If kaffe works for Kenneth, I guess his Depends line is fine. By
> "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sven> Yes, thanks it works fine (altough the postinst try to
Sven> install the plugin to mozilla-cvs, which does not exist and
Sven> thus the postinst fails)
Hmm, I'll have to look at that.
Sven> Which GR ? The one about remo
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:52:00PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > If you want to specify which of a set of real packages should be the
> > default to satisfy a particular dependency on a virtual package, you
> > should list the real package as an alternative before the virtual o
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 10:31:43AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi KEN,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kenneth Pronovici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:10 AM
> > To: Ola Lundqvist; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: j2sdk
Hi
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:10:04AM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > > You should list the working package first :
> > >
> > > working-java | java-common
> >
> > And it should look like this instead.
> >
> > working-jvm | java-virtual-machine.
>
> Ok. I will change it to:
>
>Depen
> If you want to specify which of a set of real packages should be the
> default to satisfy a particular dependency on a virtual package, you
> should list the real package as an alternative before the virtual one.
>
> If kaffe works for Kenneth, I guess his Depends line is fine. By
> "okamototk" == okamototk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi KEN,
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kenneth Pronovici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:10 AM
>> To: Ola Lundqvist; debian-java@lists.debian.org;
>> debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
>> Subject: R
> "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sven> Yes, thanks it works fine (altough the postinst try to
Sven> install the plugin to mozilla-cvs, which does not exist and
Sven> thus the postinst fails)
Hmm, I'll have to look at that.
Sven> Which GR ? The one about remo
> $ apt-cache show kaffe
> ..snip..
> Provides: java-virtual-machine, java-runtime, java1-runtime
>
> So, kaffe provides java-virtual-machine. You don't need to write dependency
> for kaffe.
Ok, that makes sense.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Personal Homepage: http://www.sk
Hi KEN,
(B
(B> -Original Message-
(B> From: Kenneth Pronovici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:10 AM
(B> To: Ola Lundqvist; debian-java@lists.debian.org;
(B> debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
(B> Subject: Re: j2sdk build-depends cannot be satisfied?
(B
> "okamototk" == okamototk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi KEN,
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kenneth Pronovici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:10 AM
>> To: Ola Lundqvist; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: j2sdk build-depends c
> $ apt-cache show kaffe
> ..snip..
> Provides: java-virtual-machine, java-runtime, java1-runtime
>
> So, kaffe provides java-virtual-machine. You don't need to write dependency
> for kaffe.
Ok, that makes sense.
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Personal Homepage: http://www.sk
Hi KEN,
(B
(B> -Original Message-
(B> From: Kenneth Pronovici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
(B> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:10 AM
(B> To: Ola Lundqvist; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
(B> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(B> Subject: Re: j2sdk build-depends cannot be satisfied?
(B> Ok. I will change it
> > You should list the working package first :
> >
> > working-java | java-common
>
> And it should look like this instead.
>
> working-jvm | java-virtual-machine.
Ok. I will change it to:
Depends: kaffe | java-virtual-machine, java-common
Is this correct?
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovic
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 07:49:10AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sven> BTW, i have tried to install the J2sdk1.4 packages, but they
> Sven> complain about a missing j2se-common. Is this the same
> Sven> package as java-common ?
> "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sven> BTW, i have tried to install the J2sdk1.4 packages, but they
Sven> complain about a missing j2se-common. Is this the same
Sven> package as java-common ?
Someone else already metioned it but you needto add main to you
bacldow
> > You should list the working package first :
> >
> > working-java | java-common
>
> And it should look like this instead.
>
> working-jvm | java-virtual-machine.
Ok. I will change it to:
Depends: kaffe | java-virtual-machine, java-common
Is this correct?
KEN
--
Kenneth J. Pronovic
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 07:49:10AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sven> BTW, i have tried to install the J2sdk1.4 packages, but they
> Sven> complain about a missing j2se-common. Is this the same
> Sven> package as java-common ?
> "Sven" == Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sven> BTW, i have tried to install the J2sdk1.4 packages, but they
Sven> complain about a missing j2se-common. Is this the same
Sven> package as java-common ?
Someone else already metioned it but you needto add main to you
bacldow
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
I have never seen that package before (j2se-common). You have to ask the
blackdown people. It is probably some other blackdown package or something
similar. I suspect that it is not the java-common thing.-
Its a blackdown package in the main section.
It provides menu entrie
Hi
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:58:45PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:43:10PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > In the original version of my package, I just listed a Depends on
> > > > java-common. Is this
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:43:10PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > In the original version of my package, I just listed a Depends on
> > > java-common. Is this still appropriate, even though I know that not
> > > every package that p
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > In the original version of my package, I just listed a Depends on
> > java-common. Is this still appropriate, even though I know that not
> > every package that provides java-common will work with my package?
Hi
java-common is NOT
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
I have never seen that package before (j2se-common). You have to ask the
blackdown people. It is probably some other blackdown package or something
similar. I suspect that it is not the java-common thing.-
Its a blackdown package in the main section.
It provides menu
Hi
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:58:45PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:43:10PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > In the original version of my package, I just listed a Depends on
> > > > java-common. Is this
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 01:43:10PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > In the original version of my package, I just listed a Depends on
> > > java-common. Is this still appropriate, even though I know that not
> > > every package that p
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > In the original version of my package, I just listed a Depends on
> > java-common. Is this still appropriate, even though I know that not
> > every package that provides java-common will work with my package?
Hi
java-common is NOT
30 matches
Mail list logo
