Re: Bug#163390: JNI Installation Directories (again)

2002-11-04 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 08:52:12PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote: > > > > Sure. If nothing else, you can do it by replacing your java runtime > > > command with a short startup script that looks for > > > -Djava.library.path=foo on the > > > > And this works with kaffe, ibm-jdk, blackdown and sun jdk?

Re: Bug#163390: JNI Installation Directories (again)

2002-11-04 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 08:52:12PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote: > > > > Sure. If nothing else, you can do it by replacing your java runtime > > > command with a short startup script that looks for > > > -Djava.library.path=foo on the > > > > And this works with kaffe, ibm-jdk, blackdown and sun jdk?

Re: Bug#163390: JNI Installation Directories (again)

2002-11-04 Thread Ben Burton
> > Sure. If nothing else, you can do it by replacing your java runtime > > command with a short startup script that looks for > > -Djava.library.path=foo on the > > And this works with kaffe, ibm-jdk, blackdown and sun jdk? It'll work with any Java runtime that supports -Djava.library.path, but

Re: Bug#163390: JNI Installation Directories (again)

2002-11-04 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 07:44:57PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > My argument for /usr/lib/jni is that other programs aren't going to want > > > to link with them, so it's better not to clutter up the default shared > > > library paths. >

Re: Bug#163390: JNI Installation Directories (again)

2002-11-04 Thread Ben Burton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > My argument for /usr/lib/jni is that other programs aren't going to want > > to link with them, so it's better not to clutter up the default shared > > library paths. > > And I assume that no changes have to be made in /etc/ld.so.conf (or > simila

Re: Bug#163390: JNI Installation Directories (again)

2002-11-04 Thread Ben Burton
> > Sure. If nothing else, you can do it by replacing your java runtime > > command with a short startup script that looks for > > -Djava.library.path=foo on the > > And this works with kaffe, ibm-jdk, blackdown and sun jdk? It'll work with any Java runtime that supports -Djava.library.path, but

Re: Bug#163390: JNI Installation Directories (again)

2002-11-04 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:03:28AM +1100, Ben Burton wrote: > > > Personally, I feel they're 'just libraries' and should be treated as > > such, going into /usr/lib. > > My argument for /usr/lib/jni is that other programs aren't going to want to > link with them, so it's better not to clutte

Re: Bug#163390: JNI Installation Directories (again)

2002-11-04 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 07:44:57PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > My argument for /usr/lib/jni is that other programs aren't going to want > > > to link with them, so it's better not to clutter up the default shared > > > library paths. >

Re: lib-rxtx-java package

2002-11-04 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 03:31:14PM -0500, Joe Phillips wrote: > On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 07:43, Mario Joussen wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:07:53PM -0500, Joe Phillips wrote: > > > I chose to package 2.0 (as opposed to 2.1) as it is documented to work > > > with Java CommAPI. I have succe

Re: JVM Registry (was: CLASSPATH and Jikes)

2002-11-04 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:47:50AM +1100, Ben Burton wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > Hi > > Well that was fun, somebody unsubscribed me from debian-java; the first I > heard was the successful unsubscription notification. As a result I nearly > missed this. But an

Re: JVM Registry (was: CLASSPATH and Jikes)

2002-11-04 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 04:14:06PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote: > I am attempting to resurrect both my Kaffe package and my involvement > therein. This JVM registry seems like a great idea. What would it take > to move it forward? Well some development of a working format for the repository and to

Re: Bug#163390: JNI Installation Directories (again)

2002-11-04 Thread Ben Burton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > My argument for /usr/lib/jni is that other programs aren't going to want > > to link with them, so it's better not to clutter up the default shared > > library paths. > > And I assume that no changes have to be made in /etc/ld.so.conf (or > simila