Hi
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:03:28AM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > Personally, I feel they're 'just libraries' and should be treated as
> > such, going into /usr/lib.
>
> My argument for /usr/lib/jni is that other programs aren't going to want to
> link with them, so it's better not to clutte
Hi
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 03:31:14PM -0500, Joe Phillips wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 07:43, Mario Joussen wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 12:07:53PM -0500, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > > I chose to package 2.0 (as opposed to 2.1) as it is documented to work
> > > with Java CommAPI. I have succe
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:47:50AM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
Hi
>
> Well that was fun, somebody unsubscribed me from debian-java; the first I
> heard was the successful unsubscription notification. As a result I nearly
> missed this. But an
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 04:14:06PM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> I am attempting to resurrect both my Kaffe package and my involvement
> therein. This JVM registry seems like a great idea. What would it take
> to move it forward?
Well some development of a working format for the repository and to
4 matches
Mail list logo
