-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well that was fun, somebody unsubscribed me from debian-java; the first I
heard was the successful unsubscription notification. As a result I nearly
missed this. But anyway:
> I am attempting to resurrect both my Kaffe package and my involvement
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: JNI Installation Directories (again)
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:41:59 +1100
> Note that some (prominent) recent non-debian JVMs don't even include
> /usr/lib in the default search path (see #160765), so /usr/lib is
> no longer an easy solution.
I
I'm really trying to make an effort at getting back on the Kaffe horse.
As a token of that effort I am uploading a really lousy effort at a
1.0.7 package. Mostly I've just taken a few basic steps and made sure
that it runs with Freenet.
I've taken care of a few major issues that were keeping it fr
I am attempting to resurrect both my Kaffe package and my involvement
therein. This JVM registry seems like a great idea. What would it take
to move it forward?
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 13:56, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > http://people.debian.org/~bab/javareg/
--
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Python case, there is one implementation and it's use /usr/lib/pyhon
> default. So, it's not problem. But in Java case, there are a lot of
> non-opensource implementation and they don't use /usr/lib/jni
> default. So, users must set library path man
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well that was fun, somebody unsubscribed me from debian-java; the first I
heard was the successful unsubscription notification. As a result I nearly
missed this. But anyway:
> I am attempting to resurrect both my Kaffe package and my involvement
From: Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: JNI Installation Directories (again)
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 07:41:59 +1100
> Note that some (prominent) recent non-debian JVMs don't even include
> /usr/lib in the default search path (see #160765), so /usr/lib is
> no longer an easy solution.
I
I'm really trying to make an effort at getting back on the Kaffe horse.
As a token of that effort I am uploading a really lousy effort at a
1.0.7 package. Mostly I've just taken a few basic steps and made sure
that it runs with Freenet.
I've taken care of a few major issues that were keeping it fr
I am attempting to resurrect both my Kaffe package and my involvement
therein. This JVM registry seems like a great idea. What would it take
to move it forward?
On Fri, 2002-04-05 at 13:56, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > http://people.debian.org/~bab/javareg/
--
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Python case, there is one implementation and it's use /usr/lib/pyhon
> default. So, it's not problem. But in Java case, there are a lot of
> non-opensource implementation and they don't use /usr/lib/jni
> default. So, users must set library path man
From: Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: JNI Installation Directories (again)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 07:03:28 +1100
> My argument for /usr/lib/jni is that other programs aren't going to want to
> link with them, so it's better not to clutter up the default shared library
> paths.
>
> It
From: Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: JNI Installation Directories (again)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 07:03:28 +1100
> My argument for /usr/lib/jni is that other programs aren't going to want to
> link with them, so it's better not to clutter up the default shared library
> paths.
>
> It
Hello All!
Does anyone know what is the current state of j2se 1.4 or 1.4.1 deb
packages for x86?
Is it downloadable from anywhere?
If not, what do I need to do to install J2SE from a tarball to comply to
java2-common requirements?
Regards,
Robert Varga
15 matches
Mail list logo
