Re: probleme with the accents

2002-10-10 Thread Mariano Kamp
Panard, I am not sure how this relates to Debian, but anyway. What exactly is your problem and what do you mean by "accent"? A single-quote? Can you paste some of the broken code? Are you looking for something like this? System.out.println("Single Quote goes here: \'"); You need t

Re: stripping .class files of debug info

2002-10-10 Thread T. Alexander Popiel
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 05:12:39PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: >> As policy requires that all "binaries" (well, it's debatable whether >> class files fall under this) should be built with debug info and >> s

Re: debs for JDE 2.2.9 beta?

2002-10-10 Thread David Shepherd
Takashi Thanks for the link. apt-get doesn't seem to like it in sources.list but I'll download the files manually and use dpkg -i Dave Takashi Okamoto wrote: From: David Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: debs for JDE 2.2.9 beta? Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:09:26 +0100 Does anyone have or know

Re: probleme with the accents

2002-10-10 Thread Mariano Kamp
Panard, I am not sure how this relates to Debian, but anyway. What exactly is your problem and what do you mean by "accent"? A single-quote? Can you paste some of the broken code? Are you looking for something like this? System.out.println("Single Quote goes here: \'"); You need

Re: stripping .class files of debug info

2002-10-10 Thread T. Alexander Popiel
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 05:12:39PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: >> As policy requires that all "binaries" (well, it's debatable whether >> class files fall under this) should be built with debug info and >>

Re: debs for JDE 2.2.9 beta?

2002-10-10 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: David Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: debs for JDE 2.2.9 beta? Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:09:26 +0100 > Does anyone have or know of .debs for the latest JDE beta (2.2.9betaXX)? I have JDE 2.2.9 beta package though it's not recent version. Please use following URL as apt-line. http:

Re: java-compiler useless?

2002-10-10 Thread T. Alexander Popiel
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:19:17PM +0100, Mark Howard wrote: > >> - Generated output is standard java bytecode [as defined by ...??] and >> stored in files of the form MyClass$MyInnerClass.class. > >Do anyone k

Re: debs for JDE 2.2.9 beta?

2002-10-10 Thread David Shepherd
Takashi Thanks for the link. apt-get doesn't seem to like it in sources.list but I'll download the files manually and use dpkg -i Dave Takashi Okamoto wrote: > From: David Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: debs for JDE 2.2.9 beta? > Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:09:26 +0100 > >>Does anyon

Re: debs for JDE 2.2.9 beta?

2002-10-10 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
David Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > David Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Does anyone have or know of .debs for the latest JDE beta > >>(2.2.9betaXX)? > > > > > > It seems the latest is 2.2.8-3 in testing and unstable: > > > > http://packages.

Re: debs for JDE 2.2.9 beta?

2002-10-10 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: David Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: debs for JDE 2.2.9 beta? Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:09:26 +0100 > Does anyone have or know of .debs for the latest JDE beta (2.2.9betaXX)? I have JDE 2.2.9 beta package though it's not recent version. Please use following URL as apt-line. http

Re: debs for JDE 2.2.9 beta?

2002-10-10 Thread David Shepherd
Yep, that's why I'm asking. Dave Arnaud Vandyck wrote: David Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Does anyone have or know of .debs for the latest JDE beta (2.2.9betaXX)? It seems the latest is 2.2.8-3 in testing and unstable: http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=jde&sear

Re: debs for JDE 2.2.9 beta?

2002-10-10 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
David Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone have or know of .debs for the latest JDE beta > (2.2.9betaXX)? It seems the latest is 2.2.8-3 in testing and unstable: http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=jde&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all -- a

Re: java-compiler useless?

2002-10-10 Thread T. Alexander Popiel
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:19:17PM +0100, Mark Howard wrote: > >> - Generated output is standard java bytecode [as defined by ...??] and >> stored in files of the form MyClass$MyInnerClass.class. > >Do anyone

Re: debs for JDE 2.2.9 beta?

2002-10-10 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
David Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > David Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Does anyone have or know of .debs for the latest JDE beta > >>(2.2.9betaXX)? > > > > > > It seems the latest is 2.2.8-3 in testing and unstable: > > > > >http://packag

Re: stripping .class files of debug info

2002-10-10 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 05:12:39PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > As policy requires that all "binaries" (well, it's debatable whether > class files fall under this) should be built with debug info and > stripped when put into the package, I'd like to know whether there is > a tool to strip debug

Re: java-compiler useless?

2002-10-10 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:19:17PM +0100, Mark Howard wrote: > On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 11:48, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > Policy feedback is apriciated. How do you think the text should be > > instead? Hi Thanks for the text. > 2.2. Java compilers > > Java compilers must depend on java-common and th

debs for JDE 2.2.9 beta?

2002-10-10 Thread David Shepherd
Hi Does anyone have or know of .debs for the latest JDE beta (2.2.9betaXX)? TIA Dave This e-mail (and any attachments) may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient please do

unsubscribe

2002-10-10 Thread Kim Blom

Re: debs for JDE 2.2.9 beta?

2002-10-10 Thread David Shepherd
Yep, that's why I'm asking. Dave Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > David Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Does anyone have or know of .debs for the latest JDE beta >>(2.2.9betaXX)? > > > It seems the latest is 2.2.8-3 in testing and unstable: > > >http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_pa

Re: debs for JDE 2.2.9 beta?

2002-10-10 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
David Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone have or know of .debs for the latest JDE beta > (2.2.9betaXX)? It seems the latest is 2.2.8-3 in testing and unstable: http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=jde&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all --

Re: very Large memory java jobs

2002-10-10 Thread Tom Badran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 10 Oct 2002 9:27 am, kristian kvilekval wrote: > The kernel is configured to be 4GB (CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G) physical ram > and it looks like we have about 3.7GB of memory available. > > Any else look incorrect? Looks fine, what JVM are you usin

Re: very Large memory java jobs

2002-10-10 Thread kristian kvilekval
The kernel is configured to be 4GB (CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G) physical ram and it looks like we have about 3.7GB of memory available. Any else look incorrect? $ cat /proc/meminfo total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached: Mem: 3776847872 78446592 36984012800 9785344 28241920

Re: stripping .class files of debug info

2002-10-10 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 05:12:39PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > As policy requires that all "binaries" (well, it's debatable whether > class files fall under this) should be built with debug info and > stripped when put into the package, I'd like to know whether there is > a tool to strip debu

Re: java-compiler useless?

2002-10-10 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:19:17PM +0100, Mark Howard wrote: > On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 11:48, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > Policy feedback is apriciated. How do you think the text should be > > instead? Hi Thanks for the text. > 2.2. Java compilers > > Java compilers must depend on java-common and t

debs for JDE 2.2.9 beta?

2002-10-10 Thread David Shepherd
Hi Does anyone have or know of .debs for the latest JDE beta (2.2.9betaXX)? TIA Dave This e-mail (and any attachments) may contain privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient plea

Re: mod_jk

2002-10-10 Thread Tom Badran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 10 Oct 2002 7:58 am, jef wrote: > Hi, > > I have to connect a Tomcat 4.0 with an Apache 1.3. Is there a jk or jk2 > version that I can use to do this or can I only use the mod_web_app. I couldnt get mod_webapp to work properly. mod_jk is s

Re: very Large memory java jobs

2002-10-10 Thread Tom Badran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 09 Oct 2002 10:59 pm, Kristian G. Kvilekval wrote: > We have several bio-computing experiments that need over > 2GB of heap. We are running on linux-2.4.19 on machines > with 4GB of memory. > > $ java -version > java version "1.3.1" > Jav

unsubscribe

2002-10-10 Thread Kim Blom
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

mod_jk

2002-10-10 Thread jef
Hi, I have to connect a Tomcat 4.0 with an Apache 1.3. Is there a jk or jk2 version that I can use to do this or can I only use the mod_web_app. Thanks, jef

Re: very Large memory java jobs

2002-10-10 Thread Tom Badran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 10 Oct 2002 9:27 am, kristian kvilekval wrote: > The kernel is configured to be 4GB (CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G) physical ram > and it looks like we have about 3.7GB of memory available. > > Any else look incorrect? Looks fine, what JVM are you usi

Re: very Large memory java jobs

2002-10-10 Thread kristian kvilekval
The kernel is configured to be 4GB (CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G) physical ram and it looks like we have about 3.7GB of memory available. Any else look incorrect? $ cat /proc/meminfo total:used:free: shared: buffers: cached: Mem: 3776847872 78446592 36984012800 9785344 28241920

Re: mod_jk

2002-10-10 Thread Tom Badran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 10 Oct 2002 7:58 am, jef wrote: > Hi, > > I have to connect a Tomcat 4.0 with an Apache 1.3. Is there a jk or jk2 > version that I can use to do this or can I only use the mod_web_app. I couldnt get mod_webapp to work properly. mod_jk is

Re: very Large memory java jobs

2002-10-10 Thread Tom Badran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 09 Oct 2002 10:59 pm, Kristian G. Kvilekval wrote: > We have several bio-computing experiments that need over > 2GB of heap. We are running on linux-2.4.19 on machines > with 4GB of memory. > > $ java -version > java version "1.3.1" > Ja