In addition to Mark's and Tom's comments, I'd like to address JNI vs CNI.
Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
Also, SableVM implements the invocation interface, and has clean
support for native code through the "standard" JNI interface.
So of course does GCJ.
>>Now, GIJ's people main objection to JNI (instea
Hi,
I have hacked on GNU Classpath (which sablevm uses as its standard class
library) and gjdoc. I am really glad that you took the effort to package
them for Debian. Especially since I am a Debian user :)
Since I have also hacked a little on (lib)gcj (which is now being merged
with GNU Classpath
In addition to Mark's and Tom's comments, I'd like to address JNI vs CNI.
Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
>>Also, SableVM implements the invocation interface, and has clean
>>support for native code through the "standard" JNI interface.
So of course does GCJ.
>>Now, GIJ's people main objection to JN
Hi,
I have hacked on GNU Classpath (which sablevm uses as its standard class
library) and gjdoc. I am really glad that you took the effort to package
them for Debian. Especially since I am a Debian user :)
Since I have also hacked a little on (lib)gcj (which is now being merged
with GNU Classpat
W liście z wto, 13-08-2002, godz. 20:40, Tom Tromey pisze:
> >> I've seen some of the follow up comments to your post. Regarding
> >> 'gij': by looking very quickly at its interpreter.cc source file, I
> >> detected important race conditions (for multithreaded apps).
> Grzegorz, perhaps you could
>> I've seen some of the follow up comments to your post. Regarding
>> 'gij': by looking very quickly at its interpreter.cc source file, I
>> detected important race conditions (for multithreaded apps).
Grzegorz, perhaps you could get Etienne to file a bug report for us.
I considered discussing
W liście z wto, 13-08-2002, godz. 20:40, Tom Tromey pisze:
> >> I've seen some of the follow up comments to your post. Regarding
> >> 'gij': by looking very quickly at its interpreter.cc source file, I
> >> detected important race conditions (for multithreaded apps).
> Grzegorz, perhaps you coul
> On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
>> W li=B6cie z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 18:13, Adam Heath pisze:
>>> Er, you say free, but are restricting me to only use what is listed in the
>>> depends.
>
> So, what about kaffe? What about gcj? Why are you saying that sable is
> better than these o
W liście z wto, 13-08-2002, godz. 17:16, Grzegorz Prokopski pisze:
> deb http://debian.sente.pl/debian ./
It should have been:
deb http://debian.sente.pl ./
Sorry!
GBP
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
>> I've seen some of the follow up comments to your post. Regarding
>> 'gij': by looking very quickly at its interpreter.cc source file, I
>> detected important race conditions (for multithreaded apps).
Grzegorz, perhaps you could get Etienne to file a bug report for us.
I considered discussin
W liście z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 21:22, Adam Heath pisze:
> So, what about kaffe? What about gcj? Why are you saying that sable is
> better than these others?
Below I am forwarding parts of a mail from sablevm author,
Etienne M. Gagnon
[...]
> > I also looked at porting abilities - I think th
Hello!
First I wanted to thank all who discussed about the idea of
free-java-sdk. I have included small FAQ and (as adviced) I'll
be including some documentation about 'why ABC is better than XYZ'.
But now - to the facts - what I have now.
I think you can try it yourself, just add to /etc/apt/sou
> On 12 Aug 2002, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote:
>> W li=B6cie z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 18:13, Adam Heath pisze:
>>> Er, you say free, but are restricting me to only use what is listed in the
>>> depends.
>
> So, what about kaffe? What about gcj? Why are you saying that sable is
> better than these
W liście z wto, 13-08-2002, godz. 17:16, Grzegorz Prokopski pisze:
> deb http://debian.sente.pl/debian ./
It should have been:
deb http://debian.sente.pl ./
Sorry!
GBP
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
W liście z pon, 12-08-2002, godz. 21:22, Adam Heath pisze:
> So, what about kaffe? What about gcj? Why are you saying that sable is
> better than these others?
Below I am forwarding parts of a mail from sablevm author,
Etienne M. Gagnon
[...]
> > I also looked at porting abilities - I think t
Hello!
First I wanted to thank all who discussed about the idea of
free-java-sdk. I have included small FAQ and (as adviced) I'll
be including some documentation about 'why ABC is better than XYZ'.
But now - to the facts - what I have now.
I think you can try it yourself, just add to /etc/apt/so
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
18 matches
Mail list logo
