Jikes busted up good - not suitable for sarge

2002-08-08 Thread Adam Majer
Package: jikes Tag: sid Severity: serious The new version of Jikes, namely 1.16, is not suitable for release. It contains some strange miscompilation errors. My current strategy is to attempt to fix them and/or use the upstream patches to fix these bugs. If we get close to the next release (sarge)

Jikes busted up good - not suitable for sarge

2002-08-08 Thread Adam Majer
Package: jikes Tag: sid Severity: serious The new version of Jikes, namely 1.16, is not suitable for release. It contains some strange miscompilation errors. My current strategy is to attempt to fix them and/or use the upstream patches to fix these bugs. If we get close to the next release (sarg

Re: dummy java2-runtime in sid?

2002-08-08 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z czw, 08-08-2002, godz. 13:51, Grzegorz Prokopski pisze: > W liście z czw, 08-08-2002, godz. 11:21, Thomas J. Zeeman pisze: > > > I'm sure there used to be a dummy java package so that you could install > > > packages that depended on a jre package, but you supplied your own? > > Yup, t

Re: dummy java2-runtime in sid?

2002-08-08 Thread Ross Burton
On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 12:51, Grzegorz Prokopski wrote: > So that we weren't forced to reinvent the wheel all the time - I'd > suggest having the set of control files (for equivs) for those dummy > packages included in java-common. > > I am offering myself to prepare them if java-common maintainer

Re: dummy java2-runtime in sid?

2002-08-08 Thread Grzegorz Prokopski
W liście z czw, 08-08-2002, godz. 11:21, Thomas J. Zeeman pisze: > > I'm sure there used to be a dummy java package so that you could install > > packages that depended on a jre package, but you supplied your own? > Yup, they used to exist. They've been pulled 'cause ftp-masters don't > seem to li

Objectif + 16%, capital garanti !

2002-08-08 Thread Consors France
            Consors France, à la pointe de l'innovation en matière d

Re: dummy java2-runtime in sid?

2002-08-08 Thread Thomas J. Zeeman
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Greg Wilkins wrote: > The blackdown packages don't show in the lists I get via apt-get update Yup. blackdown has it's own mirrors and the inclusion of their debs in Debian is hindered by some legalese. Something to do with being liable. Search the archive for more info. > o

Re: dummy java2-runtime in sid?

2002-08-08 Thread Greg Wilkins
The blackdown packages don't show in the lists I get via apt-get update of sid.Nor do I actually want to use them. I'm happy getting and installing the JVMs I use directly (various due to testing needs). I'm sure there used to be a dummy java package so that you could install packages that de

Re: java policy - when? [was: Re: policy proposal: java2 alternative]

2002-08-08 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Grzegorz" == Grzegorz Prokopski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Grzegorz> Blackdown released 1.4.1 beta - it may be good time to Grzegorz> give them strict advice on how they should prepare Grzegorz> packages for Debian. Updated j2se packages are making their slow way onto the Black