W liście z nie, 04-08-2002, godz. 11:54, Robert Bihlmeyer pisze:
> So I propose the following addition to java-policy: Providers of
That reminds me of the fact that java-policy is still in
"proposed" state.
Is there much to be added to it before it can be called done?
Maybe we should remove some
W liście z nie, 04-08-2002, godz. 11:54, Robert Bihlmeyer pisze:
> So I propose the following addition to java-policy: Providers of
That reminds me of the fact that java-policy is still in
"proposed" state.
Is there much to be added to it before it can be called done?
Maybe we should remove some
I'm sponsoring a (contrib) package that depends on
java2-runtime. I (as a user of the package) will have to install the
Blackdown VM to make it work, but I still want other java programs to
use Kaffe because it's free. Pointing the "java" alternative to Kaffe
will break the package, though ...
So
I'm sponsoring a (contrib) package that depends on
java2-runtime. I (as a user of the package) will have to install the
Blackdown VM to make it work, but I still want other java programs to
use Kaffe because it's free. Pointing the "java" alternative to Kaffe
will break the package, though ...
So
4 matches
Mail list logo
