Re: Eclipse and java blackdown

2002-06-12 Thread Matthias Pfisterer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello folks, > > Yesterday I downloaded the eclipse IDE freezed build F2 > (http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/index.php), then when I tried to run > it I got the request to update the JVM to a newer version, but > my JVM is the latest blackdown release (1.3.1). As far a

Re: Serious problems with Java & threads on stable & unstable... (?)

2002-06-12 Thread Damian Morris
On a 2.4 kernel, a combination of ulimit and /proc/sys/kernel/threads-max is your limit for "regular" processes. For threads, additional limitations may be imposed by: - the JVM. Prior to 1.3, the Sun JVM's assumed a 2MB stack, imposing a hard limit of 1024 threads. - your threads implementati

Re: Serious problems with Java & threads on stable & unstable... (?)

2002-06-12 Thread Adam Majer
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 06:44:47PM +0200, Philipp Meier wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 10:07:35PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote: > > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:32:06AM -0700, A.J. Rossini wrote: > > > > "tony" == tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > tony> For both cases, would

Re: Serious problems with Java & threads on stable & unstable...(?)

2002-06-12 Thread Damian Morris
On a 2.4 kernel, a combination of ulimit and /proc/sys/kernel/threads-max is your limit for "regular" processes. For threads, additional limitations may be imposed by: - the JVM. Prior to 1.3, the Sun JVM's assumed a 2MB stack, imposing a hard limit of 1024 threads. - your threads implementat

Re: Serious problems with Java & threads on stable & unstable... (?)

2002-06-12 Thread Adam Majer
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 06:44:47PM +0200, Philipp Meier wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 10:07:35PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote: > > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:32:06AM -0700, A.J. Rossini wrote: > > > > "tony" == tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > tony> For both cases, would

Re: Serious problems with Java & threads on stable & unstable... (?)

2002-06-12 Thread Philipp Meier
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 10:07:35PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:32:06AM -0700, A.J. Rossini wrote: > > > "tony" == tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > tony> For both cases, would it possible to post the kernel version of > > the test > > tony> box

Re: Serious problems with Java & threads on stable & unstable... (?)

2002-06-12 Thread Philipp Meier
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 10:07:35PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:32:06AM -0700, A.J. Rossini wrote: > > > "tony" == tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > tony> For both cases, would it possible to post the kernel version of the test > > tony> box? M

*****SPAM***** CIBLEZ ET DEMARCHEZ GRATUITEMENT VOS PROSPECTS PAR CENTAINES DE MILLIERS

2002-06-12 Thread VOTRE SITE ...
CIBLEZ ET DEMARCHEZ GRATUITEMENT VOS PROSPECTS PAR CENTAINE DE MILLIERS GRACE AU ROBOT MAIL - 5000 fois

*****SPAM***** CIBLEZ ET DEMARCHEZ GRATUITEMENT VOS PROSPECTS PAR CENTAINES DE MILLIERS

2002-06-12 Thread VOTRE SITE ...
CIBLEZ ET DEMARCHEZ GRATUITEMENT VOS PROSPECTS PAR CENTAINE DE MILLIERS GRACE AU ROBOT MAIL - 5000 fois

Ö¸÷½ç¾«Ó¢1899-12-30 16:06:19

2002-06-12 Thread Äþ²¨ÁÔÍ·Íø-51ceo.com
ÎÄÕ±êÌâ<Äþ²¨ÁÔÍ·Íø ÖÁ¸÷λҵ½ç¾«Ó¢º¯> µØ Ö·£ºÄþ²¨ÊÐÌåÓý¹ÝÖÐÐË·360£­2ºÅÂ¥´ö×åÃñË×´å208# ÓÊ ±à£º315040 µç »°£º 0574£­87781212´« Õæ£º0574-87781060 ÓÊ ¼þ£º [EMAIL PROTECTED] Íø Õ¾£ºwww.51ceo.com ×ð¾´µÄС½ã\ÏÈÉú£º ÄúºÃ£¡Ê×ÏȶÔÎÒÃǵÄð

Ö¸÷½ç¾«Ó¢1899-12-30 16:06:19

2002-06-12 Thread Äþ²¨ÁÔÍ·Íø-51ceo.com
ÎÄÕ±êÌâ<Äþ²¨ÁÔÍ·Íø ÖÁ¸÷λҵ½ç¾«Ó¢º¯> µØ Ö·£ºÄþ²¨ÊÐÌåÓý¹ÝÖÐÐË·360£­2ºÅÂ¥´ö×åÃñË×´å208# ÓÊ ±à£º315040 µç »°£º 0574£­87781212´« Õæ£º0574-87781060 ÓÊ ¼þ£º [EMAIL PROTECTED] Íø Õ¾£ºwww.51ceo.com ×ð¾´µÄС½ã\ÏÈÉú£º ÄúºÃ£¡Ê×ÏȶÔÎÒÃǵÄÃ