Hi list,
I am not sure if this is off topic for the lsit,
I'm sure if it is someone will let me know :).
I have had a request from one of our clients for
JSP support on our web server.
What I am wanting to do is have JSP supported on
our web server in the same waythat .php scripts are
Franck Routier wrote:
>
> So what ? Are you all telling me you are going to develop a Moz plugin
> for IBM JDK, or that your are going to implement a jit for Blackdown, or
> what
How about a Java3D-based applet that seamlessly extends IE
and Netscape to handle 3D pages as well as 2D pages?
On 2002-05-25 at 08:38, Rick Lutowski wrote:
> The problem IMO is that these powerful technologies are
> frequently used simply for glitz and not to provide real
> content or capability. The same can be said about
> 'gratuitous gifs', i.e., using image files to implement
> simple things like a li
Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > What is so bad about Java and Flash anyway?
>
> They're not bad per se, but IME they're mostly good for complementary
> stuff and sites which require them are simply broken IMHO
> ('accessibility' comes to mind).
The problem IMO is that these powerful technologies are
On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 05:08, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> Josh Huber writes:
> > Rick Lutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Yes, it's a _much_ bigger problem than generally realized.
> >> 1. No Java Plug-in = no Java 2 for browsers
> >> 2. No Java 2 for browsers = no Java 3D for browsers
> >>
Franck Routier wrote:
>
> So what ? Are you all telling me you are going to develop a Moz plugin
> for IBM JDK, or that your are going to implement a jit for Blackdown, or
> what
How about a Java3D-based applet that seamlessly extends IE
and Netscape to handle 3D pages as well as 2D pages?
On 2002-05-25 at 08:38, Rick Lutowski wrote:
> The problem IMO is that these powerful technologies are
> frequently used simply for glitz and not to provide real
> content or capability. The same can be said about
> 'gratuitous gifs', i.e., using image files to implement
> simple things like a l
Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> > What is so bad about Java and Flash anyway?
>
> They're not bad per se, but IME they're mostly good for complementary
> stuff and sites which require them are simply broken IMHO
> ('accessibility' comes to mind).
The problem IMO is that these powerful technologies are
On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 05:08, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> Josh Huber writes:
> > Rick Lutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Yes, it's a _much_ bigger problem than generally realized.
> >> 1. No Java Plug-in = no Java 2 for browsers
> >> 2. No Java 2 for browsers = no Java 3D for browsers
> >>
Sure, but the subject was : we've finally got a JVM with JIT under PPC
Linux, and that's nice...
Oh I agree. I installed it earlier today and it makes Tomcat go
"whoosh!". Strangely it makes BeanShell take much longer to start up
though.
So what ? Are you all telling me you are going to develo
Le ven 24/05/2002 à 21:54, Wilhelm *Rafial* Fitzpatrick a écrit :
> As satisfying as it may be for us to wallow in our "uphill, both
> ways, in the snow, img tag the cause of all moral failings"
> attitudes, it does occur every now and then in my workaday life that
> I must go and wrest some ti
>Sure, but the subject was : we've finally got a JVM with JIT under PPC
>Linux, and that's nice...
Oh I agree. I installed it earlier today and it makes Tomcat go
"whoosh!". Strangely it makes BeanShell take much longer to start up
though.
>So what ? Are you all telling me you are going to d
Le ven 24/05/2002 à 21:54, Wilhelm *Rafial* Fitzpatrick a écrit :
> As satisfying as it may be for us to wallow in our "uphill, both
> ways, in the snow, img tag the cause of all moral failings"
> attitudes, it does occur every now and then in my workaday life that
> I must go and wrest some t
13 matches
Mail list logo
