itz> If you permit an outsider to intrude... :)
Ola> What did you mean with this?
Java is not my cup of tea (coffee?), or at least hasn't been up to
now. I am interested in it, but I really don't like the
incompatibility of diverse JVMs and consequent uncertainty about
dependencies (and even f
itz> If you permit an outsider to intrude... :)
Ola> What did you mean with this?
Java is not my cup of tea (coffee?), or at least hasn't been up to
now. I am interested in it, but I really don't like the
incompatibility of diverse JVMs and consequent uncertainty about
dependencies (and even
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 01:07:07PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Why must all lib*-java packages depend on java-virtual-machine? gcj
> is supposed to be able to compile class files into native code, isn't
> it? So these class libraries are, in theory, usable by people who
> just use them for gcj
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 01:07:07PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
> Andrew> Both are shipped as Java bytecode (*.class files, packaged in
> Andrew> a *.jar archive) and with an "Architecture: all" since Java
> Andrew> bytecode is supposed to be portable.
>
> Andrew> seems to forbid both code with
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 04:51:02PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Andrew" == Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andrew> seems to forbid both code with native parts, and Java code
> Andrew> compiled to machine binaries with gcj. It seems reasonable to
> Andrew> me to allow both of t
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 01:07:07PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> Why must all lib*-java packages depend on java-virtual-machine? gcj
> is supposed to be able to compile class files into native code, isn't
> it? So these class libraries are, in theory, usable by people who
> just use them for gcj
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 01:07:07PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
> Andrew> Both are shipped as Java bytecode (*.class files, packaged in
> Andrew> a *.jar archive) and with an "Architecture: all" since Java
> Andrew> bytecode is supposed to be portable.
>
> Andrew> seems to forbid both code with
You're not going to believe what's happening
to me now.someone is doing an experiment on me.I mean an
experiment on a living creature.
it's kind of hard to explain this
situation.
Base: liquid
thing interacting with human body in itself.1. they raise some
koreans(about 20) and put liquid t
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 04:51:02PM -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > "Andrew" == Andrew Pimlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andrew> seems to forbid both code with native parts, and Java code
> Andrew> compiled to machine binaries with gcj. It seems reasonable to
> Andrew> me to allow both of
9 matches
Mail list logo
