Re: deb for netbeans

2002-05-04 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:45:24AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 06:37:14PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > > Ainsi parlait Vendredi 3 Mai 2002 04:12, Matt Zimmerman : > > > Assuming that it requires a Java2 virtual machine, it isn't useful with > > > software available i

Re: deb for netbeans

2002-05-04 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi I'll answer a lot of things in this tread at the same time. On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 06:37:14PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Ainsi parlait Vendredi 3 Mai 2002 04:12, Matt Zimmerman : > > On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:09:40AM +0200, Roman Kennke wrote: > > > I wondered if there is a deb availab

Kaffe and Java2

2002-05-04 Thread Jim Pick
Hi, I just noticed in the Debian Java FAQ that it says that Kaffe is not going to be implementing Java2 (for legal reasons). I don't think that's correct. I want to see as much of the Java2 APIs implemented as possible in Kaffe. It will probably be a long time before we have all of Java2 implem

Re: deb for netbeans

2002-05-04 Thread Jim Pick
> I thought that the build process of OpenOffice depended on [I'm being > vague here :-(] "some bundle of Java2 stuff," which would have the > result that despite OpenOffice itself being "free software," since a > build requires distinctly nonfree stuff, it can't go in "free." > > It's almost enou

Re: deb for netbeans

2002-05-04 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I thought that the build process of OpenOffice depended on [I'm being > vague here :-(] "some bundle of Java2 stuff," which would have the > result that despite OpenOffice itself being "free software," since a > build requires distinctly nonfree stuff, it can't go in "f

Re: deb for netbeans

2002-05-04 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hi I'll answer a lot of things in this tread at the same time. On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 06:37:14PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Ainsi parlait Vendredi 3 Mai 2002 04:12, Matt Zimmerman : > > On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:09:40AM +0200, Roman Kennke wrote: > > > I wondered if there is a deb availa

Re: java.home

2002-05-04 Thread Geoff Beaumont
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 00:09, Geoff Beaumont wrote: > On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 19:23, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > > Geoff Beaumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think you mean /usr/lib/j2re1.3. > > That'd be the one... > > > The problem is that /usr/lib/j2sdk1.3/jre is a symlink to > > /usr/lib/j2

Kaffe and Java2

2002-05-04 Thread Jim Pick
Hi, I just noticed in the Debian Java FAQ that it says that Kaffe is not going to be implementing Java2 (for legal reasons). I don't think that's correct. I want to see as much of the Java2 APIs implemented as possible in Kaffe. It will probably be a long time before we have all of Java2 imple

Re: deb for netbeans

2002-05-04 Thread Jim Pick
> I thought that the build process of OpenOffice depended on [I'm being > vague here :-(] "some bundle of Java2 stuff," which would have the > result that despite OpenOffice itself being "free software," since a > build requires distinctly nonfree stuff, it can't go in "free." > > It's almost eno

Re: deb for netbeans

2002-05-04 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I thought that the build process of OpenOffice depended on [I'm being > vague here :-(] "some bundle of Java2 stuff," which would have the > result that despite OpenOffice itself being "free software," since a > build requires distinctly nonfree stuff, it can't go in "

Re: java.home

2002-05-04 Thread Geoff Beaumont
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 00:09, Geoff Beaumont wrote: > On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 19:23, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > > Geoff Beaumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think you mean /usr/lib/j2re1.3. > > That'd be the one... > > > The problem is that /usr/lib/j2sdk1.3/jre is a symlink to > > /usr/lib/j