On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:45:24AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 06:37:14PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > Ainsi parlait Vendredi 3 Mai 2002 04:12, Matt Zimmerman :
> > > Assuming that it requires a Java2 virtual machine, it isn't useful with
> > > software available i
Hi
I'll answer a lot of things in this tread at the same time.
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 06:37:14PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Ainsi parlait Vendredi 3 Mai 2002 04:12, Matt Zimmerman :
> > On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:09:40AM +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
> > > I wondered if there is a deb availab
Hi,
I just noticed in the Debian Java FAQ that it says that Kaffe is not
going to be implementing Java2 (for legal reasons).
I don't think that's correct. I want to see as much of the Java2 APIs
implemented as possible in Kaffe. It will probably be a long time
before we have all of Java2 implem
> I thought that the build process of OpenOffice depended on [I'm being
> vague here :-(] "some bundle of Java2 stuff," which would have the
> result that despite OpenOffice itself being "free software," since a
> build requires distinctly nonfree stuff, it can't go in "free."
>
> It's almost enou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I thought that the build process of OpenOffice depended on [I'm being
> vague here :-(] "some bundle of Java2 stuff," which would have the
> result that despite OpenOffice itself being "free software," since a
> build requires distinctly nonfree stuff, it can't go in "f
Hi
I'll answer a lot of things in this tread at the same time.
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 06:37:14PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Ainsi parlait Vendredi 3 Mai 2002 04:12, Matt Zimmerman :
> > On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:09:40AM +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
> > > I wondered if there is a deb availa
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 00:09, Geoff Beaumont wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 19:23, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> > Geoff Beaumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think you mean /usr/lib/j2re1.3.
>
> That'd be the one...
>
> > The problem is that /usr/lib/j2sdk1.3/jre is a symlink to
> > /usr/lib/j2
Hi,
I just noticed in the Debian Java FAQ that it says that Kaffe is not
going to be implementing Java2 (for legal reasons).
I don't think that's correct. I want to see as much of the Java2 APIs
implemented as possible in Kaffe. It will probably be a long time
before we have all of Java2 imple
> I thought that the build process of OpenOffice depended on [I'm being
> vague here :-(] "some bundle of Java2 stuff," which would have the
> result that despite OpenOffice itself being "free software," since a
> build requires distinctly nonfree stuff, it can't go in "free."
>
> It's almost eno
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I thought that the build process of OpenOffice depended on [I'm being
> vague here :-(] "some bundle of Java2 stuff," which would have the
> result that despite OpenOffice itself being "free software," since a
> build requires distinctly nonfree stuff, it can't go in "
On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 00:09, Geoff Beaumont wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-04-21 at 19:23, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> > Geoff Beaumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think you mean /usr/lib/j2re1.3.
>
> That'd be the one...
>
> > The problem is that /usr/lib/j2sdk1.3/jre is a symlink to
> > /usr/lib/j
11 matches
Mail list logo