On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:54:01PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
> Ok then. I wasn't too sure about it anyway. By the way since there are
> several different specifications (1.2, 1.3, 1.4) for java2 vm (and their
> base libraries), shouldn't there be some way to handle dependencies on
> specificat
Ok then. I wasn't too sure about it anyway. By the way since there are
several different specifications (1.2, 1.3, 1.4) for java2 vm (and their
base libraries), shouldn't there be some way to handle dependencies on
specifications? For instance i have a project that needs 1.4. Right now
i don't see
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:54:01PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
> Ok then. I wasn't too sure about it anyway. By the way since there are
> several different specifications (1.2, 1.3, 1.4) for java2 vm (and their
> base libraries), shouldn't there be some way to handle dependencies on
> specifica
Ok then. I wasn't too sure about it anyway. By the way since there are
several different specifications (1.2, 1.3, 1.4) for java2 vm (and their
base libraries), shouldn't there be some way to handle dependencies on
specifications? For instance i have a project that needs 1.4. Right now
i don't see
Ainsi parlait Vendredi 3 Mai 2002 04:12, Matt Zimmerman :
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:09:40AM +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
> > I wondered if there is a deb available for Netbeans? Its a great open
> > source IDE, I think. Or is there something wrong with the license?
>
> Assuming that it requires a
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:42:48PM +0400, Lev B. Olkhovich wrote:
> Sorry if that's obvious, but what's wrong with Sun jvm (JRE SE 1.4)?
> I thought that it is suitable for non-free... (sections 2,3 of JRE SE
> license)
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch2.html
--
- mdz
--
> "Franck" == franck routier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Franck> Did anyone analyse the move Sun made under the Apache
Franck> Foundation pressure ? I've read it could lead to truly free
Franck> JVM, maybe for java 1.5 ?
That's very unlikely. I think the best you can hope for is that
you'll
On Fri, 03 May 2002 09:45:21 EDT, the world broke into rejoicing as
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 11:46:42PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
>
> > I was wondering now that you mensioned the java2 vm. I've seen on the
> > "packages being worked on" list that open
Ainsi parlait Vendredi 3 Mai 2002 04:12, Matt Zimmerman :
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:09:40AM +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
> > I wondered if there is a deb available for Netbeans? Its a great open
> > source IDE, I think. Or is there something wrong with the license?
>
> Assuming that it requires a
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 11:46:42PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
> I was wondering now that you mensioned the java2 vm. I've seen on the
> "packages being worked on" list that openoffice debs are being prepared.
> I am not sure how accurate this list is but openoffice is on. As far as
> i know bot
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:42:48PM +0400, Lev B. Olkhovich wrote:
> Sorry if that's obvious, but what's wrong with Sun jvm (JRE SE 1.4)?
> I thought that it is suitable for non-free... (sections 2,3 of JRE SE
> license)
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch2.html
--
- mdz
--
> "Franck" == franck routier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Franck> Did anyone analyse the move Sun made under the Apache
Franck> Foundation pressure ? I've read it could lead to truly free
Franck> JVM, maybe for java 1.5 ?
That's very unlikely. I think the best you can hope for is that
you'll
On Fri, 03 May 2002 09:45:21 EDT, the world broke into rejoicing as
Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 11:46:42PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
>
> > I was wondering now that you mensioned the java2 vm. I've seen on the
> > "packages being worked on" list that ope
Hello,
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:09:40AM +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
>
> > I wondered if there is a deb available for Netbeans? Its a great open
> > source IDE, I think. Or is there something wrong with the license?
>
> Assuming that it requires a Java2 virtual machine, it isn't useful with
> so
가브리엘향수
파운데이션
총알청바지
\25,000
\39,000
\31,500
허락 없이 메일을 보내드려 죄송합니다.
원치 않으시면 옆의 버튼을 눌러주세요.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 11:46:42PM -0700, Nicos Panayides wrote:
> I was wondering now that you mensioned the java2 vm. I've seen on the
> "packages being worked on" list that openoffice debs are being prepared.
> I am not sure how accurate this list is but openoffice is on. As far as
> i know bo
Hello,
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:09:40AM +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
>
> > I wondered if there is a deb available for Netbeans? Its a great open
> > source IDE, I think. Or is there something wrong with the license?
>
> Assuming that it requires a Java2 virtual machine, it isn't useful with
> s
¡¡
°¡ºê¸®¿¤Çâ¼ö
ÆÄ¿îµ¥À̼Ç
ÃѾËû¹ÙÁö
\25,000
\39,000
\31,500
Çã¶ô ¾øÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»µå·Á Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù.
¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ¸½Ã¸é ¿·ÀÇ ¹öÆ°À» ´·¯ÁÖ¼¼¿ä.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
le ven 03-05-2002 à 04:12, Matt Zimmerman a écrit :
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:09:40AM +0200, Roman Kennke wrote:
>
> > I wondered if there is a deb available for Netbeans? Its a great open
> > source IDE, I think. Or is there something wrong with the license?
>
> Assuming that it requires a Ja
I was wondering now that you mensioned the java2 vm. I've seen on the
"packages being worked on" list that openoffice debs are being prepared.
I am not sure how accurate this list is but openoffice is on. As far as
i know both openoffice and sun's jdk have the same licenses. How come
sun's jdk (or
20 matches
Mail list logo
