Hi,
Is anyone using Jtrix, or has anyone evaluated it ?
Homepage of the project is at http://www.jtrix.org/
I've read the site but I'm not sure to understand what it is about...
Any comment ?
Franck
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con
> This is exactly the Java registry idea that's been discussed here in
> the past. Check the archives from the end of last year. You might
> in particular see Ben Burton's message with subject "JVM Registry:
> Implemented".
>
> I believe most people think it's basically a good idea, but I'm not
> This is exactly the Java registry idea that's been discussed here in
> the past. Check the archives from the end of last year. You might
> in particular see Ben Burton's message with subject "JVM Registry:
> Implemented".
>
> I believe most people think it's basically a good idea, but I'm not
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 05:19:29PM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> On a related note
This is exactly the Java registry idea that's been discussed here in
the past. Check the archives from the end of last year. You might
in particular see Ben Burton's message with subject "JVM Registry:
Impleme
> I was just thinking of a simple way to set up my classpath so I made
> this suggestion. But if it is not common to do somthing like that, then
> I have to live with that. And maybe collecting all libs might not lead
> to the expected result, because of combining libs in different versions
> with
> It would be nice to have debconf provide a list of suitable installed
> JVM's. It could also have another option to select the path of a non-deb
> JDK installation.
On a related note
After having just made some .debs for j2sdk1.4, jbuilder6, and jEdit, I had
to write a couple of startup sc
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 05:19:29PM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
> On a related note
This is exactly the Java registry idea that's been discussed here in
the past. Check the archives from the end of last year. You might
in particular see Ben Burton's message with subject "JVM Registry:
Implem
> I was just thinking of a simple way to set up my classpath so I made
> this suggestion. But if it is not common to do somthing like that, then
> I have to live with that. And maybe collecting all libs might not lead
> to the expected result, because of combining libs in different versions
> wit
> It would be nice to have debconf provide a list of suitable installed
> JVM's. It could also have another option to select the path of a non-deb
> JDK installation.
On a related note
After having just made some .debs for j2sdk1.4, jbuilder6, and jEdit, I had
to write a couple of startup s
Hi all.
I recognize this discussion from some discussions some time ago.
Then we discussed that every package that provides java classes should
define its CLASSPATH in some way. I'd really like to see this in action.
There are suggestions in http://bugs.debian.org/103420
I'll include it here for
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 06:44:40AM -0500, Eric Smith wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am having problems embedding fonts with fop and want to upgrade to the
> lastest version.
>
> However if I install the latest libfop viz libfop-java 1:0.20.3-1, I
> cannot get fop to execute without class not found errors.
>
Hi all.
I recognize this discussion from some discussions some time ago.
Then we discussed that every package that provides java classes should
define its CLASSPATH in some way. I'd really like to see this in action.
There are suggestions in http://bugs.debian.org/103420
I'll include it here fo
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 06:44:40AM -0500, Eric Smith wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am having problems embedding fonts with fop and want to upgrade to the lastest
>version.
>
> However if I install the latest libfop viz libfop-java 1:0.20.3-1, I
> cannot get fop to execute without class not found errors.
>
Hi
I am having problems embedding fonts with fop and want to upgrade to the
lastest version.
However if I install the latest libfop viz libfop-java 1:0.20.3-1, I
cannot get fop to execute without class not found errors.
I also cannot find a batik package.
Any suggetions?
thanx
--
Eric Smith
Hi
I am having problems embedding fonts with fop and want to upgrade to the lastest
version.
However if I install the latest libfop viz libfop-java 1:0.20.3-1, I
cannot get fop to execute without class not found errors.
I also cannot find a batik package.
Any suggetions?
thanx
--
Eric Smith
15 matches
Mail list logo
