Re: Java FAQ needs updating for GCJ

2002-02-25 Thread Rick Lutowski
Per Bothner wrote: > > Rick Lutowski wrote: > > Is this due to awt peers not being available for GCJ? > > No - (some) peers are available. The political and license issues > have been resolved recently, and the Classpath AWT code has been > merged in. Tom Tromey has done a fair bit recently, bu

Re: Java FAQ needs updating for GCJ

2002-02-25 Thread Rick Lutowski
Per Bothner wrote: > > Rick Lutowski wrote: > > Is this due to awt peers not being available for GCJ? > > No - (some) peers are available. The political and license issues > have been resolved recently, and the Classpath AWT code has been > merged in. Tom Tromey has done a fair bit recently, b

Re: NBIO (Non-blocking I/O)

2002-02-25 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
> I find myself with a need for the NBIO package from: > >http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~mdw/proj/java-nbio/ > > which implements non-blocking socket I/O. It's sort of a precursor to > the nbio functionality that's in the Java 1.4 beta, implemented on top > of standard socket calls like poll().

Re: NBIO (Non-blocking I/O)

2002-02-25 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
> I find myself with a need for the NBIO package from: > >http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~mdw/proj/java-nbio/ > > which implements non-blocking socket I/O. It's sort of a precursor to > the nbio functionality that's in the Java 1.4 beta, implemented on top > of standard socket calls like poll()