Rick Lutowski wrote:
* GCJ (except for GUI application - AWT is still not usable).
Is this due to awt peers not being available for GCJ?
No - (some) peers are available. The political and license issues
have been resolved recently, and the Classpath AWT code has been
merged in. Tom Tromey has don
Rick Lutowski wrote:
>>* GCJ (except for GUI application - AWT is still not usable).
>>
>
> Is this due to awt peers not being available for GCJ?
No - (some) peers are available. The political and license issues
have been resolved recently, and the Classpath AWT code has been
merged in. Tom Tr
Per Bothner wrote:
>
> 2.1 full-fledged Java development
>
> Pleae add:
>
> * GCJ (except for GUI application - AWT is still not usable).
Is this due to awt peers not being available for GCJ?
> 2.3.1.5 Why is (some) free software not implementing Java2?
>
>Sun has made public statements
Per Bothner wrote:
>
> 2.1 full-fledged Java development
>
> Pleae add:
>
> * GCJ (except for GUI application - AWT is still not usable).
Is this due to awt peers not being available for GCJ?
> 2.3.1.5 Why is (some) free software not implementing Java2?
>
>Sun has made public statement
"Michael C. Alonzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> my class is doing a prototype of a call center, ala
> rescue 911... i suggested to them that we use Java but they
> are having doubts if java can be use in mission-critical systems.
> can someone cite a company or a corporation or some system tha
"Michael C. Alonzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> my class is doing a prototype of a call center, ala
> rescue 911... i suggested to them that we use Java but they
> are having doubts if java can be use in mission-critical systems.
> can someone cite a company or a corporation or some system th
The Debian Java FAQ still does give GCJ its proper due.
(I'm senstive about this, since I think in general
I think more people should try gcj.)
I'd appreciate it if you made the following changes:
1.6.1: Java1 compiler (.java to .class)
Please remove the sentence " but might not be able to compile
The Debian Java FAQ still does give GCJ its proper due.
(I'm senstive about this, since I think in general
I think more people should try gcj.)
I'd appreciate it if you made the following changes:
1.6.1: Java1 compiler (.java to .class)
Please remove the sentence " but might not be able to comp
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 11:55:03PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > are the JNI APIs available in debian?
>
> Do you mean the header files?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> dlocate jni.h
> kaffe: /usr/include/kaffe/jni.h
> libgcj2-dev: /usr/include/jni.h
> j2sdk1.3: /usr/lib/j2sdk1.3/include/jni.h
>
> Th
can i get Sun's Java Telephony API and use it with
Blackdown's J2sdk?
tnx
--
"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains,
however improbable, must be the truth."
--Sherlock Holmes _The Sign of Four_
> are the JNI APIs available in debian?
Do you mean the header files?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> dlocate jni.h
kaffe: /usr/include/kaffe/jni.h
libgcj2-dev: /usr/include/jni.h
j2sdk1.3: /usr/lib/j2sdk1.3/include/jni.h
The third package (j2sdk1.3) is from blackdown, but kaffe and libgcj2-dev are
both
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 11:55:03PM +1100, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> > are the JNI APIs available in debian?
>
> Do you mean the header files?
>
> bab@espresso:~> dlocate jni.h
> kaffe: /usr/include/kaffe/jni.h
> libgcj2-dev: /usr/include/jni.h
> j2sdk1.3: /usr/lib/j2sdk1.3/include/jni.h
>
> The th
can i get Sun's Java Telephony API and use it with
Blackdown's J2sdk?
tnx
--
"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains,
however improbable, must be the truth."
--Sherlock Holmes _The Sign of Four_
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
> are the JNI APIs available in debian?
Do you mean the header files?
bab@espresso:~> dlocate jni.h
kaffe: /usr/include/kaffe/jni.h
libgcj2-dev: /usr/include/jni.h
j2sdk1.3: /usr/lib/j2sdk1.3/include/jni.h
The third package (j2sdk1.3) is from blackdown, but kaffe and libgcj2-dev are
both in d
14 matches
Mail list logo
