Re: Backtrace

2002-02-17 Thread Stephen Zander
Gak, hit the wriong key. > "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Colin> The last seven uploads of jikes have been NMUs. Since Colin> another bug (#119551) is holding up freenet-unstable, would Colin> there be a problem with me making another one? If so, do Colin>

Re: Backtrace

2002-02-17 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Colin> The last seven uploads of jikes have been NMUs. Since Colin> another bug (#119551) is holding up freenet-unstable, would Colin> there be a problem with me making another one? If so, do Colin> debian-java think it would

Re: Backtrace

2002-02-17 Thread Colin Watson
tags 123041 patch thanks On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 04:06:37AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > This is a 64-bit issue; jikes assumes that sizeof(int) == sizeof(void*), > which isn't true on alpha or ia64. Specifically, in src/ast.h it tries > to declare objects of type AstArray, where > LexStream::Token

Re: Experimental Tomcat 4.0.2 package

2002-02-17 Thread Guy Geens
> "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stefan> I just removed all in /var/cache/tomcat4 and tried 0.6 and it Stefan> worked fine on my system (i386, Blackdown JDK 1.3.1 and Sun Stefan> JDK 1.4). Which JDK are you using? Please note that all Stefan> versions up to 0.6 have a bu

Re: Backtrace

2002-02-17 Thread Stephen Zander
Gak, hit the wriong key. > "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Colin> The last seven uploads of jikes have been NMUs. Since Colin> another bug (#119551) is holding up freenet-unstable, would Colin> there be a problem with me making another one? If so, do Colin

Re: Backtrace

2002-02-17 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Colin" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Colin> The last seven uploads of jikes have been NMUs. Since Colin> another bug (#119551) is holding up freenet-unstable, would Colin> there be a problem with me making another one? If so, do Colin> debian-java think it woul

Re: Backtrace

2002-02-17 Thread Colin Watson
tags 123041 patch thanks On Sun, Feb 17, 2002 at 04:06:37AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > This is a 64-bit issue; jikes assumes that sizeof(int) == sizeof(void*), > which isn't true on alpha or ia64. Specifically, in src/ast.h it tries > to declare objects of type AstArray, where > LexStream::Toke

Subscribe

2002-02-17 Thread Christopher Browne
subscribe -- (reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.adanac@" "enworbbc")) http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/spreadsheets.html He doesn't have much of a reputation, or so I've heard.

Subscribe

2002-02-17 Thread Christopher Browne
subscribe -- (reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.adanac@" "enworbbc")) http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/spreadsheets.html He doesn't have much of a reputation, or so I've heard. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Installed jdom 0.7b.20020216-1 (all source)

2002-02-17 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Installed jdom 0.7b.20020216-1 (all source) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 21:53:56 +0900 (JST) > $ doc++ -v -ng -q --java --html `find . -name "*.java"` ... > Reading files... > Merging duplicate entries... > > After then, I couldn't get any response

Re: Installed jdom 0.7b.20020216-1 (all source)

2002-02-17 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Installed jdom 0.7b.20020216-1 (all source) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 13:00:33 +0100 > Takashi Okamoto wrote: > > >* remove javadoc because I need SUN's javac to generate javadoc. > > But I want to put jdom into main. So I gave up generati

Re: Installed jdom 0.7b.20020216-1 (all source)

2002-02-17 Thread Stefan Gybas
Takashi Okamoto wrote: * remove javadoc because I need SUN's javac to generate javadoc. But I want to put jdom into main. So I gave up generating them. Have you tried doc++? That's one of the main problems if Java packages are in main: You can't generate good Javadocs. And Javadocs are very

Re: Installed jdom 0.7b.20020216-1 (all source)

2002-02-17 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Installed jdom 0.7b.20020216-1 (all source) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 21:53:56 +0900 (JST) > $ doc++ -v -ng -q --java --html `find . -name "*.java"` ... > Reading files... > Merging duplicate entries... > > After then, I couldn't get any respons

Re: Installed jdom 0.7b.20020216-1 (all source)

2002-02-17 Thread Takashi Okamoto
From: Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Installed jdom 0.7b.20020216-1 (all source) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 13:00:33 +0100 > Takashi Okamoto wrote: > > >* remove javadoc because I need SUN's javac to generate javadoc. > > But I want to put jdom into main. So I gave up generat

Re: Installed jdom 0.7b.20020216-1 (all source)

2002-02-17 Thread Stefan Gybas
Takashi Okamoto wrote: >* remove javadoc because I need SUN's javac to generate javadoc. > But I want to put jdom into main. So I gave up generating them. Have you tried doc++? That's one of the main problems if Java packages are in main: You can't generate good Javadocs. And Javadocs