> IMO, You should not defined it. Because JNI libraries are used by only
> Java applications. Java applications should define $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> when they are executed.
>
> regards,
>
> Takashi Okamoto
Thanks for all of the feedback. That's enough to work with for now.
KEN
--
Kenneth J.
> IMO, You should not defined it. Because JNI libraries are used by only
> Java applications. Java applications should define $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> when they are executed.
>
> regards,
>
> Takashi Okamoto
Thanks for all of the feedback. That's enough to work with for now.
KEN
--
Kenneth J.
From: Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NBIO (Non-blocking I/O)
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 11:14:05 -0600
> This looks like it matches the policy. However, for other libaries like
> lib-gnu.getopt-java, I get:
>
>/usr/share/java/repositories/gnu/getopt/
>
> This doesn't match th
From: Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NBIO (Non-blocking I/O)
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 11:14:05 -0600
> This looks like it matches the policy. However, for other libaries like
> lib-gnu.getopt-java, I get:
>
>/usr/share/java/repositories/gnu/getopt/
>
> This doesn't match t
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:33:43AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
>
> > Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> >
> > > Is it possible to make kind of installer packages for these
> > > dependencies? Like the realplayer package or else.
> >
> >
> > Yes, sure it is.
[Sorry for the long email; I have a lot of questions.]
> http://people.debian.org/~opal/java/policy.html/
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2001/debian-java-200107/msg0.html
I did read the policy, and I have now looked over the JNI email thread.
I'm a little confused about how the policy
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 11:33:43AM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Stefan Gybas wrote:
>
> > Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> >
> > > Is it possible to make kind of installer packages for these
> > > dependencies? Like the realplayer package or else.
> >
> >
> > Yes, sure it is.
From: Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NBIO (Non-blocking I/O)
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 15:57:05 +0100
> Did you have a look at the Java Policy? It is available in the
> java-common package... Or, alternatively, from
>
> http://people.debian.org/~bortz//Java/policy.html
>
> To th
On Saturday 9 February 2002 15:51, Rick Lutowski wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If you'd prefer to take this discussion off the list, that's fine,
> > > too.
> >
> > I do not know for everybody but I am very interresting in that
> > d
[Sorry for the long email; I have a lot of questions.]
> http://people.debian.org/~opal/java/policy.html/
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2001/debian-java-200107/msg0.html
I did read the policy, and I have now looked over the JNI email thread.
I'm a little confused about how the policy
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you'd prefer to take this discussion off the list, that's fine,
> > too.
>
> I do not know for everybody but I am very interresting in that
> discussion so if the discussion takes place out of the list, can
From: Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NBIO (Non-blocking I/O)
Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 15:57:05 +0100
> Did you have a look at the Java Policy? It is available in the
> java-common package... Or, alternatively, from
>
> http://people.debian.org/~bortz//Java/policy.html
>
> To t
On Saturday 9 February 2002 15:51, Rick Lutowski wrote:
> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If you'd prefer to take this discussion off the list, that's fine,
> > > too.
> >
> > I do not know for everybody but I am very interresting in that
> >
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>
> Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you'd prefer to take this discussion off the list, that's fine,
> > too.
>
> I do not know for everybody but I am very interresting in that
> discussion so if the discussion takes place out of the list, can
Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since this is a native package that results in a .so as well as some
> .class files, I need to make sure that the Java runtime environment
> knows how to find everything. Right now, I've installed it off
> /opt/local/lib and changed $LD_LIBRAR
"J. R. Westmoreland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do I understand this correctly?
> The installer behavior would be like the package that does the java docs?
> If this is correct that might be a good solution.
That's exactly what I was thinking about.
-- Arnaud
http://vbstefi60.fapse.ulg.ac.be/
Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since this is a native package that results in a .so as well as some
> .class files, I need to make sure that the Java runtime environment
> knows how to find everything. Right now, I've installed it off
> /opt/local/lib and changed $LD_LIBRA
"J. R. Westmoreland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do I understand this correctly?
> The installer behavior would be like the package that does the java docs?
> If this is correct that might be a good solution.
That's exactly what I was thinking about.
-- Arnaud
http://vbstefi60.fapse.ulg.ac.be/
18 matches
Mail list logo
