> Soeren> the mod_jk.so in tomcats configuration from libexec/mod_jk.so
> Soeren> to /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_jk.so.
>
> Hmm... I only have the latter file.
well my mod_jk.so lies in /usr/lib/apache/1.3/
The default directory in tomcat's config is
libexec/mod_jk.so. Obviously that is wrong.
That
> Soeren> the mod_jk.so in tomcats configuration from libexec/mod_jk.so
> Soeren> to /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_jk.so.
>
> Hmm... I only have the latter file.
well my mod_jk.so lies in /usr/lib/apache/1.3/
The default directory in tomcat's config is
libexec/mod_jk.so. Obviously that is wrong.
Tha
Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Sunday, December 9, 2001 at 16:09:01
---
: Hey, what's up, yall? I found a site and if you want to meet people and talk
to people on web
> "Soeren" == Soeren Kalesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Soeren> Now I'm wondering how it's possible to change the location of
Soeren> the mod_jk.so in tomcats configuration from libexec/mod_jk.so
Soeren> to /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_jk.so.
Hmm... I only have the latter file.
Soeren> It also s
Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Sunday, December 9, 2001 at 16:09:01
---
: Hey, what's up, yall? I found a site and if you want to meet people and talk to
:people on w
> "Soeren" == Soeren Kalesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Soeren> Now I'm wondering how it's possible to change the location of
Soeren> the mod_jk.so in tomcats configuration from libexec/mod_jk.so
Soeren> to /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_jk.so.
Hmm... I only have the latter file.
Soeren> It also
hello,
I installed mod_jk to make Apache work together with Tomcat.
Since I have woody I got Tomcat 3.2.
I put
Include /usr/share/tomcat/conf/mod_jk.conf-auto
into my http.conf to let tomcat configure the Apache
things on startup since this is recommended.
Now I'm wondering how it's p
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 11:20:55PM -0500, Jacob Robert Wilkins wrote:
> Pardon my igornance if this is a dumb question, the java policy and
> packaging in Debian seems to be an overcomplicated beast, and I'm not
> sure why certian things are done as they are
>
> I have java-virtual-machine-dum
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 07:28:19PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> Can I do the above? It's just so crappily wrong to have this, it should have
> never existed, the person(s) who thought it up should be flambayed(sp).
I think you should calm down.
> I WANT to remove ALL traces of this from ALL packag
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 02:20:44PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 06:35:06AM -0500, Michael Bilow wrote:
>
> > I am curious about the problem referenced about Tomcat 4.0 not being able
> > to be packaged because it depends upon non-free JAR files from Sun.
>
> The Tomcat 4.0
hello,
I installed mod_jk to make Apache work together with Tomcat.
Since I have woody I got Tomcat 3.2.
I put
Include /usr/share/tomcat/conf/mod_jk.conf-auto
into my http.conf to let tomcat configure the Apache
things on startup since this is recommended.
Now I'm wondering how it's
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 11:20:55PM -0500, Jacob Robert Wilkins wrote:
> Pardon my igornance if this is a dumb question, the java policy and
> packaging in Debian seems to be an overcomplicated beast, and I'm not
> sure why certian things are done as they are
>
> I have java-virtual-machine-du
On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 07:28:19PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> Can I do the above? It's just so crappily wrong to have this, it should have
> never existed, the person(s) who thought it up should be flambayed(sp).
I think you should calm down.
> I WANT to remove ALL traces of this from ALL packa
On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 02:20:44PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 06:35:06AM -0500, Michael Bilow wrote:
>
> > I am curious about the problem referenced about Tomcat 4.0 not being able
> > to be packaged because it depends upon non-free JAR files from Sun.
>
> The Tomcat 4.
14 matches
Mail list logo
