Re: [summary] Re: policy proposition for javadoc installation

2001-12-02 Thread Per Bothner
Tollef Fog Heen wrote: Debian doesn't use RPM as part of the package management infrastructure, and any limitations of RPM is therefore irrelevant to how Debian should handle javadoc, and (in general) Debian policy. So, again: why should Debian policy care about RPM systems? Only in the context of

Re: [summary] Re: policy proposition for javadoc installation

2001-12-02 Thread Per Bothner
Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > Debian doesn't use RPM as part of the package management > infrastructure, and any limitations of RPM is therefore irrelevant to > how Debian should handle javadoc, and (in general) Debian policy. > > So, again: why should Debian policy care about RPM systems? Only in

Re: [summary] Re: policy proposition for javadoc installation

2001-12-02 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* GOMEZ Henri | >Why should Debian policy care about rpm systems? | | /usr/share/javadoc , at least on rpm systems No need to shout, I am able to read. Also, you didn't answer the question. | Who speak about debian ? This is a list which is called debian-java@lists.debian.org, which mea

Re: [summary] Re: policy proposition for javadoc installation

2001-12-02 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* GOMEZ Henri | >Why should Debian policy care about rpm systems? | | /usr/share/javadoc , at least on rpm systems No need to shout, I am able to read. Also, you didn't answer the question. | Who speak about debian ? This is a list which is called [EMAIL PROTECTED], which means that it