hi
ist it possible to perform a "quick update" to tomcat 3.3.x???
i found the follwing in a mailing-list (after some hours of searching)
...
Your email does not indicate which version of Tomcat you are using,
hence I am assuming that you are
using Tomcat 3.2.x. Now, as far as I know the issue be
hi!
can anyone say when tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 will exist as .deb package?
cu
markus
--
---
Markus Garschaemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hartmannstr. 129fon: 09131/626715
91058
hi
ist it possible to perform a "quick update" to tomcat 3.3.x???
i found the follwing in a mailing-list (after some hours of searching)
...
Your email does not indicate which version of Tomcat you are using,
hence I am assuming that you are
using Tomcat 3.2.x. Now, as far as I know the issue b
hi!
can anyone say when tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 will exist as .deb package?
cu
markus
--
---
Markus Garschaemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hartmannstr. 129fon: 09131/626715
91058
Ainsi parlait Andrew Pimlott :
> Upstream Java developers bundle all their dependencies because Sun
> hasn't given them any alternatives, and that is understandable (on
> the developers' part, not Sun's!). But this is Debian, and we have
> standards and conventions for our packages, so we should d
Ainsi parlait Robert Bihlmeyer :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Pimlott) writes:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 12:21:57PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > > According to discussion, it seems we agreed on following points:
> >
> > I didn't realize there was consensus, [...]
>
> Me neither. For the reco
Ainsi parlait Andrew Pimlott :
> Upstream Java developers bundle all their dependencies because Sun
> hasn't given them any alternatives, and that is understandable (on
> the developers' part, not Sun's!). But this is Debian, and we have
> standards and conventions for our packages, so we should
Ainsi parlait Robert Bihlmeyer :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Pimlott) writes:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 12:21:57PM +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > > According to discussion, it seems we agreed on following points:
> >
> > I didn't realize there was consensus, [...]
>
> Me neither. For the rec
> "Max" == Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Max> Why can't package X-doc put the documentation under
Max> /usr/share/doc/X instead of /usr/share/doc/X-doc?
There was a proposal in debian-devel from Anthony Towns which
completely addresses your issues.
See <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Max" == Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Max> Why can't package X-doc put the documentation under
Max> /usr/share/doc/X instead of /usr/share/doc/X-doc?
There was a proposal in debian-devel from Anthony Towns which
completely addresses your issues.
See <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2001/11/26 18:55
> I agree that if there is a package with so much documentation that
> installing it all might take up too much space. In that case,
> separate -doc and -javadoc packages would be ok. But Debian tends
> to discourage "frivilous" package splitting, so this should only be
> done
Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just did an upgrade and tomcat now requires java2-runtime which the
> Blackdown package of j2sdk1.3 does not provide. Is someone working
> to upgrade j2sdk1.3 control file so that I don't have to install jdk
> 1.1 to get tomcat to install?
Instal
On 2001/11/26 18:55
> I agree that if there is a package with so much documentation that
> installing it all might take up too much space. In that case,
> separate -doc and -javadoc packages would be ok. But Debian tends
> to discourage "frivilous" package splitting, so this should only be
> don
>I got a message from Henri suggesting that I look at going to
>tomcat 3.3 and then building the
>connectors from jakarta-tomcat-connectors for ajp14.
Warning ajp14 in jtc is a currently under developpement
and don't expect a release before some weeks. For Tomcat 3.3
, you should consider ajp13 a
14 matches
Mail list logo
