ARE YOU TIRED OF SLOW INTERNET
CONNECTIONS?
WANT BLISTERING FAST WEB SPEED?
TO SPEED UP YOUR DOWNLOADS CLICK HERE NOW!
GUARANTEED TO BOOST YOUR
INTERNET SPEED BY UP TO 220%.
CLICK
HERE TO LEARN MORE!
Remove yourself from this list by either:
Entering your email address
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You say that the war-files allow the classloading. That is not entirely
> true. Take tomcat for example.
>
> * You place a war-file in the specified directory.
>
> * Restart tomcat.
>
> * Tomcat now unzi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have a question to you all. Should we allow the same interface in
> > different
> > packages? It seems to create strange conflicts but sometime it is necessary,
> > or? What do you all think?
>
> Tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sometimes I think Sun forgets about all the people who write Java application,
> while they are hyping applets, servlets, J2EE etc. Does anyone still remember
> Jini? What has happened to that "revolution"
IBM have released Eclipse (www.eclipse.org) under the "Common Public
License". Eclipse is (among other things) what will become the base for
their successor to the (IMO excellent) "Visual Age for Java" IDE. It is
written in Java, and requires "an 1.3 level Java runtime environment"
to run. More
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You say that the war-files allow the classloading. That is not entirely
> true. Take tomcat for example.
>
> * You place a war-file in the specified directory.
>
> * Restart tomcat.
>
> * Tomcat now unz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have a question to you all. Should we allow the same interface in different
> > packages? It seems to create strange conflicts but sometime it is necessary,
> > or? What do you all think?
>
> That's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sometimes I think Sun forgets about all the people who write Java application,
> while they are hyping applets, servlets, J2EE etc. Does anyone still remember
> Jini? What has happened to that "revolution
IBM have released Eclipse (www.eclipse.org) under the "Common Public
License". Eclipse is (among other things) what will become the base for
their successor to the (IMO excellent) "Visual Age for Java" IDE. It is
written in Java, and requires "an 1.3 level Java runtime environment"
to run. More
On 0, Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No Class-Path at all whenever possible.. remember the example that Xalan2
> > provides a Xalan1-compatibility layer - it Xalan2 must be included, we can
> > satisfy all Xalan1-dependencies with that library (with lower precedence).
> > Not poss
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 01:08:42PM +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 0, Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have now read this. Not very much of a documentation so I have some
> > questions... :)
> >
> > The Class-Path:-thing. Is it per Name: (class) or per jar-file?
>
>
> What exact
On 0, Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have now read this. Not very much of a documentation so I have some
> questions... :)
>
> The Class-Path:-thing. Is it per Name: (class) or per jar-file?
What exactly do you mean with "Name: (class)" ?
> > This whole thing seems to me very br
On 0, Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No Class-Path at all whenever possible.. remember the example that Xalan2 provides
>a Xalan1-compatibility layer - it Xalan2 must be included, we can satisfy all
>Xalan1-dependencies with that library (with lower precedence). Not possible with
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 01:08:42PM +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 0, Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have now read this. Not very much of a documentation so I have some
> > questions... :)
> >
> > The Class-Path:-thing. Is it per Name: (class) or per jar-file?
>
>
> What exac
On 0, Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have now read this. Not very much of a documentation so I have some
> questions... :)
>
> The Class-Path:-thing. Is it per Name: (class) or per jar-file?
What exactly do you mean with "Name: (class)" ?
> > This whole thing seems to me very b
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 12:51:07PM +1100, Jeff Turner wrote:
> > * Tomcat now unzips this file to the webapp directory.
>
> Or if you're running Tomcat 4.0 and have unpackWARs="false", the war
> isn't unzipped. I think that's Sun's goal. In the same way jars aren't
> unpacked before you can use th
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 12:51:07PM +1100, Jeff Turner wrote:
> > * Tomcat now unzips this file to the webapp directory.
>
> Or if you're running Tomcat 4.0 and have unpackWARs="false", the war
> isn't unzipped. I think that's Sun's goal. In the same way jars aren't
> unpacked before you can use t
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 05:22:50PM +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 0, Jeff Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How about using the jar manifest to store the jar metadata, as Sun
> > intended? Make the jars their own database. A platform-independent
> > database :)
>
>
> Jeff, your idea sound
18 matches
Mail list logo
