Re: APL & LGPL & GPL

2001-10-23 Thread Raul Miller
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 11:04:47AM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote: > Is it "legal" to have (I am thinking Java here): > > - A GPL-ed program that uses > a LPGL-ed libraries that uses > a "Apache Public License"-ed library > > The be precise, i am considering packaging a GPL-ed tool that uses t

Re: APL & LGPL & GPL

2001-10-23 Thread Raul Miller
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 11:04:47AM +0200, Egon Willighagen wrote: > Is it "legal" to have (I am thinking Java here): > > - A GPL-ed program that uses > a LPGL-ed libraries that uses > a "Apache Public License"-ed library > > The be precise, i am considering packaging a GPL-ed tool that uses

Re: java2-*-dummy packages rejected

2001-10-23 Thread Ben Burton
> (Ben, do your scripts totally alleviate these problems ?) Alas, no. :) The scripts handle choosing the correct JVM at runtime. The -dummy packages were designed to handle package dependencies which is quite a separate issue. Ben.

Re: [Jpackage-devel] Debian package list for Java (Re: jpackage project presentation)

2001-10-23 Thread Takashi Okamoto
At Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:09:55 +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > > I added Debian package list into your page, and attached it this mail. > > How about it? > Sorry, i'm not sure to understand what you mean. > The attached list is the jpackage mandrake package list, automaticaly > generated (php scrip

Re: java2-*-dummy packages rejected

2001-10-23 Thread Ben Burton
> (Ben, do your scripts totally alleviate these problems ?) Alas, no. :) The scripts handle choosing the correct JVM at runtime. The -dummy packages were designed to handle package dependencies which is quite a separate issue. Ben. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: [Jpackage-devel] Debian package list for Java (Re: jpackage project presentation)

2001-10-23 Thread Takashi Okamoto
At Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:09:55 +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > > I added Debian package list into your page, and attached it this mail. > > How about it? > Sorry, i'm not sure to understand what you mean. > The attached list is the jpackage mandrake package list, automaticaly > generated (php scri

java2-*-dummy packages rejected

2001-10-23 Thread Marcus Crafter
Hi All, Hope all is well! Well, it seems after all the discussion about our java2 virtual packages, etc, the java2-*-dummy packages were rejected from the archive: http://incoming.debian.org/REJECT/java-common_0.8_i386.reason along with the latest

APL & LGPL & GPL

2001-10-23 Thread Egon Willighagen
Hi all, i have been browsing the archives but i could not find a definate answer: Is it "legal" to have (I am thinking Java here): - A GPL-ed program that uses a LPGL-ed libraries that uses a "Apache Public License"-ed library The be precise, i am considering packaging a GPL-ed tool that u

java2-*-dummy packages rejected

2001-10-23 Thread Marcus Crafter
Hi All, Hope all is well! Well, it seems after all the discussion about our java2 virtual packages, etc, the java2-*-dummy packages were rejected from the archive: http://incoming.debian.org/REJECT/java-common_0.8_i386.reason along with the lates

APL & LGPL & GPL

2001-10-23 Thread Egon Willighagen
Hi all, i have been browsing the archives but i could not find a definate answer: Is it "legal" to have (I am thinking Java here): - A GPL-ed program that uses a LPGL-ed libraries that uses a "Apache Public License"-ed library The be precise, i am considering packaging a GPL-ed tool that