On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 04:25:34PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote:
>
> Hi.. I noticed that java-common 0.8 has been rejected from the archives.
> Since there will have to be a new upload, I don't suppose it would be
> possible to include the registry stuff along with it?
Well it is a possibility. Th
On Friday 19 October 2001 03:26, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
> "Anthony Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Guillaume wrote:
> > > I would like to present jpackage project here, as it seems we have
> > > similar goals:
> >
> > What would be very interesting (to me, at least!) is to see packages with
Kevin wrote:
> I think this will become more popular when woody ships (with GCC 3.0x and
GCJ).
> Right now many people aren't running GCJ.
I guess we'll have to wait longer than that even because most of rhug doesn't
build or run correctly without the use of the GCC trunk (what will eventually
be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Anthony Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Guillaume wrote:
> > I would like to present jpackage project here, as it seems we have similar
> > goals:
>
> What would be very interesting (to me, at least!) is to see packages with gcj
> built binarie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Anthony Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Guillaume wrote:
> > I would like to present jpackage project here, as it seems we have similar
> > goals:
>
> What would be very interesting (to me, at least!) is to see packages with gcj
> built binari
Hi.. I noticed that java-common 0.8 has been rejected from the archives.
Since there will have to be a new upload, I don't suppose it would be
possible to include the registry stuff along with it?
*flutters eyelids*
I can write drafts for the appropriate policy changes if desired.
My only qu
Hi.. I noticed that java-common 0.8 has been rejected from the archives.
Since there will have to be a new upload, I don't suppose it would be
possible to include the registry stuff along with it?
*flutters eyelids*
I can write drafts for the appropriate policy changes if desired.
My only q
Guillaume wrote:
> I would like to present jpackage project here, as it seems we have similar
> goals:
What would be very interesting (to me, at least!) is to see packages with gcj
built binaries. We are building shared libraries and executables out of many
of the packages you've identified for j
Guillaume wrote:
> I would like to present jpackage project here, as it seems we have similar
> goals:
What would be very interesting (to me, at least!) is to see packages with gcj
built binaries. We are building shared libraries and executables out of many
of the packages you've identified for
Ainsi parlait Egon Willighagen :
[..]
> There are some tools developed to resolve classpaths needed for JVM's
> and other things that make life for a Java packager easier...
> I myself developed a tool that outputs the required jar files from a set
> of jar files which satisfies the "imported" clas
Ainsi parlait Ola Lundqvist :
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 08:25:11PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > Hello folks.
> >
> > I would like to present jpackage project here, as it seems we have
> > similar goals:
> > 1 - to provide packaged java application for linux distributions
> > 2 - to establish
Ainsi parlait Egon Willighagen :
[..]
> There are some tools developed to resolve classpaths needed for JVM's
> and other things that make life for a Java packager easier...
> I myself developed a tool that outputs the required jar files from a set
> of jar files which satisfies the "imported" cla
Ainsi parlait Ola Lundqvist :
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 08:25:11PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > Hello folks.
> >
> > I would like to present jpackage project here, as it seems we have
> > similar goals:
> > 1 - to provide packaged java application for linux distributions
> > 2 - to establish
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 08:25:11PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Hello folks.
>
> I would like to present jpackage project here, as it seems we have similar
> goals:
> 1 - to provide packaged java application for linux distributions
> 2 - to establish a clean fhs-compliant policy for them.
> S
On Wednesday 17 October 2001 20:25, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Hello folks.
>
> I would like to present jpackage project here, as it seems we have similar
> goals:
> 1 - to provide packaged java application for linux distributions
> 2 - to establish a clean fhs-compliant policy for them.
> See proje
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 08:25:11PM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> Hello folks.
>
> I would like to present jpackage project here, as it seems we have similar
> goals:
> 1 - to provide packaged java application for linux distributions
> 2 - to establish a clean fhs-compliant policy for them.
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
