Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

2001-09-10 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 03:13:35PM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote: > Hi Ben, > > On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Ben Burton wrote: > > > > Do you mean that the java2-virtual-machine-dummy package should also > > > provide java-virtual-machine ? > > > > Well, that too, but that's not what I meant. :) > >

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

2001-09-10 Thread Ben Burton
> I think his (Juergen's) point is that j2re is simply a better > description of this claim than java2-virtual-machine. True, but my concern was that the current blackdown packages seem to be named j2re1.3 and j2sdk1.3, and I'd personally be happier if the virtual package doesn't appear tied to a

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

2001-09-10 Thread Andrew Pimlott
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 05:41:08PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > > > I don't see much value in "java2-virtual-machine" unless it actually > > means a complete Java 2 runtime environment. > > > > Our new packages currently provide j2re and j2re.. > > The idea is that much as I love the blackdown port

Re: java-common proposal: whichjava (not findjava)

2001-09-10 Thread Andrew Pimlott
[ Late reply due to backlog. ] On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 06:13:04PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > Okay. I have a new proposal for java-common, namely the scripts > /usr/bin/whichjava and /usr/bin/whichjavac. > > What these do is take the given Java interpreter/compiler and spit out > properties suc

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

2001-09-10 Thread Ben Burton
> I think his (Juergen's) point is that j2re is simply a better > description of this claim than java2-virtual-machine. True, but my concern was that the current blackdown packages seem to be named j2re1.3 and j2sdk1.3, and I'd personally be happier if the virtual package doesn't appear tied to

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

2001-09-10 Thread Andrew Pimlott
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 05:41:08PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > > > I don't see much value in "java2-virtual-machine" unless it actually > > means a complete Java 2 runtime environment. > > > > Our new packages currently provide j2re and j2re.. > > The idea is that much as I love the blackdown por

Re: java-common proposal: whichjava (not findjava)

2001-09-10 Thread Andrew Pimlott
[ Late reply due to backlog. ] On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 06:13:04PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote: > Okay. I have a new proposal for java-common, namely the scripts > /usr/bin/whichjava and /usr/bin/whichjavac. > > What these do is take the given Java interpreter/compiler and spit out > properties su

>>>11,000,000 EMAIL ADDRESSES..............

2001-09-10 Thread intspecialistsremovals
Dear debian-java@lists.debian.org, Would you like to send an Email Advertisement to 11,000,000 PEOPLE DAILY for FREE? === 1) Let's say you... Sell a $24.95 PRODUCT or SERVICE. 2) Let's say you... Broadcast Email to 500,000 PEOPLE DAILY. 3) Let's

>>>11,000,000 EMAIL ADDRESSES..............

2001-09-10 Thread intspecialistsremovals
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED], Would you like to send an Email Advertisement to 11,000,000 PEOPLE DAILY for FREE? === 1) Let's say you... Sell a $24.95 PRODUCT or SERVICE. 2) Let's say you... Broadcast Email to 500,000 PEOPLE DAILY. 3) Let's say you..