Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

2001-09-04 Thread Colin Walters
Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One point to note is that j2sdk1.3 and j2re1.3 are not yet in debian > at all. I believe (correct me if I'm wrong) that a package in > debian can't depend on a package outside of debian. I asked about this on IRC a while ago in the context of emacs21; a n

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

2001-09-04 Thread Colin Walters
Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One point to note is that j2sdk1.3 and j2re1.3 are not yet in debian > at all. I believe (correct me if I'm wrong) that a package in > debian can't depend on a package outside of debian. I asked about this on IRC a while ago in the context of emacs21; a

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

2001-09-04 Thread Ben Burton
Okay, not to throw a proverbial spanner in, but: One point to note is that j2sdk1.3 and j2re1.3 are not yet in debian at all. I believe (correct me if I'm wrong) that a package in debian can't depend on a package outside of debian. > This way, a user can install Sun's or IBM's JDK to /usr/loc

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

2001-09-04 Thread Stefan Gybas
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 05:42:16PM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote: > JPDA is a Java 2 platform thing, and will only work with Java 2 > sdk/jdk's - is there a current policy recommendation for specifying > this in 'depend' lists ? I suggest to use "j2sdk1.3 | j2re1.3 | java-vitual-machine-dummy". T

Packages that require Java 2 ?

2001-09-04 Thread Marcus Crafter
Hi All, Hope all is well. I'm currently packaging up JSwat for Debian. JSwat is a really cool JPDA debugger. The package is just about ready, but I have a housekeeping question: JPDA is a Java 2 platform thing, and will only work with Java 2 sdk/j

Re: What is the status of j2sdk1.3?

2001-09-04 Thread Marcus Crafter
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Ola> Hi I just want to know if there are anyone who knows anything >Ola> about the status of j2sdk1.3? Will it be included in >Ola> non-free, or is the license too tight? > >It will be included in non-free RSN. Is there

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

2001-09-04 Thread Ben Burton
Okay, not to throw a proverbial spanner in, but: One point to note is that j2sdk1.3 and j2re1.3 are not yet in debian at all. I believe (correct me if I'm wrong) that a package in debian can't depend on a package outside of debian. > This way, a user can install Sun's or IBM's JDK to /usr/lo

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

2001-09-04 Thread Stefan Gybas
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 05:42:16PM +0200, Marcus Crafter wrote: > JPDA is a Java 2 platform thing, and will only work with Java 2 > sdk/jdk's - is there a current policy recommendation for specifying > this in 'depend' lists ? I suggest to use "j2sdk1.3 | j2re1.3 | java-vitual-machine-dummy".

Packages that require Java 2 ?

2001-09-04 Thread Marcus Crafter
Hi All, Hope all is well. I'm currently packaging up JSwat for Debian. JSwat is a really cool JPDA debugger. The package is just about ready, but I have a housekeeping question: JPDA is a Java 2 platform thing, and will only work with Java 2 sdk/

Re: What is the status of j2sdk1.3?

2001-09-04 Thread Marcus Crafter
> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Ola> Hi I just want to know if there are anyone who knows anything >Ola> about the status of j2sdk1.3? Will it be included in >Ola> non-free, or is the license too tight? > >It will be included in non-free RSN. Is there