Re: java library installation issues

On 05 Apr 2001 00:26:11 -0700, Seth Arnold wrote: > * Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010405 00:14]: > > This would certainly be a good option... If we good get it as flexible > > as the proposed Perl launcher > > I've got to throw in my two cents: I too hate the idea of using any sort >

Re: java library installation issues

On 05 Apr 2001 00:26:11 -0700, Seth Arnold wrote: > * Egon Willighagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010405 00:14]: > > This would certainly be a good option... If we good get it as flexible > > as the proposed Perl launcher > > I've got to throw in my two cents: I too hate the idea of using any sort

Re: Java libraries and proposal.

> "Joe" == Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joe> Does the GNU definition say that the arch-independent stuff Joe> "must" or "should" go there, or do they just say that it "can"? Joe> Is /usr/lib/appname just as legal for the stuff that's Joe> arch-independent or is it discouraged? GNU

Re: Java libraries and proposal.

> "Joe" == Joe Emenaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joe> Does the GNU definition say that the arch-independent stuff Joe> "must" or "should" go there, or do they just say that it "can"? Joe> Is /usr/lib/appname just as legal for the stuff that's Joe> arch-independent or is it discouraged? GN