* Matthew Sherborne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010312 12:29]:
> I'm using the jde package, originally with the blackdown compiler etc.
Hmm. I have the j2sdk1.3 package installed. If you add the line:
deb ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/blackdown.org/debian woody
non-free
to your /etc/a
* Matthew Sherborne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010312 12:29]:
> I'm using the jde package, originally with the blackdown compiler etc.
Hmm. I have the j2sdk1.3 package installed. If you add the line:
deb ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/blackdown.org/debian woody non-free
to your /etc/a
Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Another reason is the lack of standards in the way compilers and VMs
> are run, making the installation of every new jar a problem (defining
> environment variables, etc). The proposed Java policy tried to solve
> this and I would suggest that work
On Monday 12 March 2001 21:16, Matthew Sherborne wrote:
> I couldn't get the blackdown "java" program to run my program. It says
> java.lang.NoClassDef("HelloWorld"); (or something like that)
Is your "CLASSPATH" set correct? Try "export CLASSPATH=." and then try again.
(that's a dot after the =).
Hi I'm a newbie Java guy. It took me three days to get setup with Java
in Debian.
I'm using the jde package, originally with the blackdown compiler etc.
I couldn't get the blackdown "java" program to run my program. It says
java.lang.NoClassDef("HelloWorld"); (or something like that)
Any way I
Oliver Elphick wrote:
> /usr3/home/olly/mypackages/pg7.1/postgresql-7.1beta5/src/interfaces/
> jdbc/build.xml:99: Cannot use classic compiler, as it is not available
Try using the jikes compiler instead, i.e. add (or change) the
build.compiler property in this section:
> ...bafflement! What
Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Another reason is the lack of standards in the way compilers and VMs
> are run, making the installation of every new jar a problem (defining
> environment variables, etc). The proposed Java policy tried to solve
> this and I would suggest that wor
On Monday 12 March 2001 21:16, Matthew Sherborne wrote:
> I couldn't get the blackdown "java" program to run my program. It says
> java.lang.NoClassDef("HelloWorld"); (or something like that)
Is your "CLASSPATH" set correct? Try "export CLASSPATH=." and then try again.
(that's a dot after the =)
Hi I'm a newbie Java guy. It took me three days to get setup with Java
in Debian.
I'm using the jde package, originally with the blackdown compiler etc.
I couldn't get the blackdown "java" program to run my program. It says
java.lang.NoClassDef("HelloWorld"); (or something like that)
Any way
Oliver Elphick wrote:
> /usr3/home/olly/mypackages/pg7.1/postgresql-7.1beta5/src/interfaces/
> jdbc/build.xml:99: Cannot use classic compiler, as it is not available
Try using the jikes compiler instead, i.e. add (or change) the
build.compiler property in this section:
> ...bafflement! Wha
hOn 12 Mar 2001, Per Bothner wrote:
> True - but Gcj *does* supply a VM in the traditional (java) sense.
> I guess not enough people know this.
Indeed, I am one of them.
> Gcj aims to be a *complete* Java solution.
As I say, I had no idea. I thought gcj was purely a compiler project,
which mea
Stephen Zander wrote:
>> "Oliver" == Oliver Elphick writes:
>Oliver> ...bafflement! What is "classic compiler"? The XML line
>Oliver> begins "
>Oliver> I have jdk1.1 installed, which contains
>Oliver> /usr/lib/jdk1.1/bin/javac.
>
>Are these JDBC drivers definativ
Bob Ham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010312 03:25]:
> I was under the impression that Gcj's main purpose was to build a java
> compiler,
The purpose is to be a Java implementation which is *based* on
ahead-of-time-compilation - but it does include a VM.
Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Because g
> "Oliver" == Oliver Elphick writes:
Oliver> ...bafflement! What is "classic compiler"? The XML line
Oliver> begins " I have jdk1.1 installed, which contains
Oliver> /usr/lib/jdk1.1/bin/javac.
Are these JDBC drivers definatively known to work with a 1.1 JDK or do
they require Jav
hOn 12 Mar 2001, Per Bothner wrote:
> True - but Gcj *does* supply a VM in the traditional (java) sense.
> I guess not enough people know this.
Indeed, I am one of them.
> Gcj aims to be a *complete* Java solution.
As I say, I had no idea. I thought gcj was purely a compiler project,
which me
Stephen Zander wrote:
>> "Oliver" == Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Oliver> ...bafflement! What is "classic compiler"? The XML line
>Oliver> begins "
>Oliver> I have jdk1.1 installed, which contains
>Oliver> /usr/lib/jdk1.1/bin/javac.
>
>Are these JD
Bob Ham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010312 03:25]:
> I was under the impression that Gcj's main purpose was to build a java
> compiler,
The purpose is to be a Java implementation which is *based* on
ahead-of-time-compilation - but it does include a VM.
Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Because
> "Oliver" == Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Oliver> ...bafflement! What is "classic compiler"? The XML line
Oliver> begins " I have jdk1.1 installed, which contains
Oliver> /usr/lib/jdk1.1/bin/javac.
Are these JDBC drivers definatively known to work with a 1.1 JDK or
* Bob Ham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010312 03:25]:
> I was under the impression that Gcj's main purpose was to build a java
> compiler, as opposed to Kaffe's which was to build a VM, having KJC as
> an aside. Did I miss something?
Because gcj can compile directly to native machine code, gcj can compet
Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>Oliver Elphick wrote:
>
>> Debs of PostgreSQL 7.1beta5 are available at http://people.debian.org/~elp
>hick/
>> postgresql/
>
>Great ! Thank you, Oliver !
>
>A suggestion :
>
>Could some kind soul prepare the JDBC drivers (and maybe package the
On 11 Mar 2001, Per Bothner wrote:
> (Note I am not particularly interested in the success of Kaffe,
> given my association with Gcj, which can be viewed as a Kaffe
> competitor.)
I was under the impression that Gcj's main purpose was to build a java
compiler, as opposed to Kaffe's which was to b
Alan KF LAU wrote:
> Thanks for your information I didn't release there's microsoft.jar in
> it. :D
>
> I'm not going to hate kaffe because it's being funded by Microsoft, but
> its lack of java.security. Java programmers would find it difficult to
> build a commercial grade java application with
* Bob Ham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010312 03:25]:
> I was under the impression that Gcj's main purpose was to build a java
> compiler, as opposed to Kaffe's which was to build a VM, having KJC as
> an aside. Did I miss something?
Because gcj can compile directly to native machine code, gcj can compe
Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>Oliver Elphick wrote:
>
>> Debs of PostgreSQL 7.1beta5 are available at http://people.debian.org/~elp
>hick/
>> postgresql/
>
>Great ! Thank you, Oliver !
>
>A suggestion :
>
>Could some kind soul prepare the JDBC drivers (and maybe package th
On 11 Mar 2001, Per Bothner wrote:
> (Note I am not particularly interested in the success of Kaffe,
> given my association with Gcj, which can be viewed as a Kaffe
> competitor.)
I was under the impression that Gcj's main purpose was to build a java
compiler, as opposed to Kaffe's which was to
Alan KF LAU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As a Java programmer I seriously suspect any one could build a
> commercial-level(in-house, transaction-based, etc.) java application
> without java.security.
I assume you mean "doubt" instead of "suspect".
"commercial-level" does not mean "in-house, tra
Alan KF LAU wrote:
> Thanks for your information I didn't release there's microsoft.jar in
> it. :D
>
> I'm not going to hate kaffe because it's being funded by Microsoft, but
> its lack of java.security. Java programmers would find it difficult to
> build a commercial grade java application wit
27 matches
Mail list logo
