On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, therapy wrote:
>
>
> within native threads the fork mechanism is not used.
> [...]
> is no need to copy parent process pages, cause all
> threads are allowed (and have) to operate on the same copy.
>
> man clone
Yeap, it's much more clear now after reading this manpage, t
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, therapy wrote:
>
>
> within native threads the fork mechanism is not used.
> [...]
> is no need to copy parent process pages, cause all
> threads are allowed (and have) to operate on the same copy.
>
> man clone
Yeap, it's much more clear now after reading this manpage,
> > this is due to the use of native threads by default in jdk1.3, which in
> > linux are spawn as processess... so, everything's still fine :-)
> >
> Well, I thought _native_ threads are implemented as threads ;), not
> processes. Isn't it less effective this way ? Forking is
> time-expensive...
> > this is due to the use of native threads by default in jdk1.3, which in
> > linux are spawn as processess... so, everything's still fine :-)
> >
> Well, I thought _native_ threads are implemented as threads ;), not
> processes. Isn't it less effective this way ? Forking is
> time-expensive..
* Przemyslaw Wegrzyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001106 09:23]:
> Well, I thought _native_ threads are implemented as threads ;), not
> processes. Isn't it less effective this way ? Forking is time-expensive...
With copy-on-write pages, I don't think forking is all that expensive.
(Corrections welcomed!
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, jose antonio ortega ruiz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 02:08:51PM +0100, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> >
> > I have just installed j2sdk1.3 from Blackdown's debs. I tried to configure
> > Tomcat to use it insted of jdk1.2.2.
> > But when I restart tomcat - java forks into
* Przemyslaw Wegrzyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001106 09:23]:
> Well, I thought _native_ threads are implemented as threads ;), not
> processes. Isn't it less effective this way ? Forking is time-expensive...
With copy-on-write pages, I don't think forking is all that expensive.
(Corrections welcomed
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, jose antonio ortega ruiz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 02:08:51PM +0100, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> >
> > I have just installed j2sdk1.3 from Blackdown's debs. I tried to configure
> > Tomcat to use it insted of jdk1.2.2.
> > But when I restart tomcat - java forks into
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 02:08:51PM +0100, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
>
> I have just installed j2sdk1.3 from Blackdown's debs. I tried to configure
> Tomcat to use it insted of jdk1.2.2.
> But when I restart tomcat - java forks into 25 processes running
> Tomcat
> strange, huh ?
> With jdk1.2
I have just installed j2sdk1.3 from Blackdown's debs. I tried to configure
Tomcat to use it insted of jdk1.2.2.
But when I restart tomcat - java forks into 25 processes running
Tomcat
strange, huh ?
With jdk1.2.2 everything's fine...
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wednesday 1 November 2000, at 23 h 54, the keyboard of Seth Arnold
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Try rebuilding Kaffe after installing GNU gmp.
>
> GMP detection was broken in Kaffe (it is needed in Freenet, for
> instance). It works in the CVS version of K
I have just installed j2sdk1.3 from Blackdown's debs. I tried to configure
Tomcat to use it insted of jdk1.2.2.
But when I restart tomcat - java forks into 25 processes running
Tomcat
strange, huh ?
With jdk1.2.2 everything's fine...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 02:08:51PM +0100, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
>
> I have just installed j2sdk1.3 from Blackdown's debs. I tried to configure
> Tomcat to use it insted of jdk1.2.2.
> But when I restart tomcat - java forks into 25 processes running
> Tomcat
> strange, huh ?
> With jdk1.
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Wednesday 1 November 2000, at 23 h 54, the keyboard of Seth Arnold
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Try rebuilding Kaffe after installing GNU gmp.
>
> GMP detection was broken in Kaffe (it is needed in Freenet, for
> instance). It works in the CVS version of
14 matches
Mail list logo
