Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If we had a policy which meets a rough consensus, you could tell him
> "Because it is The Policy" :-)
Consensus among whom? Do Debian developers who don't care about Java
have to be involved, or can it just be those on the debian-java list.
I'm
On Thursday 14 September 2000, at 8 h 27, the keyboard of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is this a conflict? Foo.jar will never be a top-level directory of the
> Java classes.
Right but I find it inelegant.
> The reason I'm pressing this issue is that I'd like to see Kawa and BRL
> packaged for De
Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If we had a policy which meets a rough consensus, you could tell him
> "Because it is The Policy" :-)
Consensus among whom? Do Debian developers who don't care about Java
have to be involved, or can it just be those on the debian-java list.
I'm
On Thursday 14 September 2000, at 8 h 27, the keyboard of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is this a conflict? Foo.jar will never be a top-level directory of the
> Java classes.
Right but I find it inelegant.
> The reason I'm pressing this issue is that I'd like to see Kawa and BRL
> packaged for D
Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Because you need a place to put the jars, too (for people who prefer
> them). If we choose your proposal, jars will be directly in the root
> of Java classes.
Is this a conflict? Foo.jar will never be a top-level directory of the
Java classes.
>
Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Because you need a place to put the jars, too (for people who prefer
> them). If we choose your proposal, jars will be directly in the root
> of Java classes.
Is this a conflict? Foo.jar will never be a top-level directory of the
Java classes.
On Wednesday 13 September 2000, at 16 h 38, the keyboard of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why would anyone have a problem with /usr/share/java being the
> repository.
Because you need a place to put the jars, too (for people who prefer them). If
we choose your proposal, jars will be directly in t
On Wednesday 13 September 2000, at 16 h 38, the keyboard of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why would anyone have a problem with /usr/share/java being the
> repository.
Because you need a place to put the jars, too (for people who prefer them). If
we choose your proposal, jars will be directly in
8 matches
Mail list logo
