On Monday 4 September 2000, at 21 h 25, the keyboard of John Leuner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's interesting that you if can run a Java "binary" you'll also be able
> to build the sources very easily. This is because Java is always linked at
> run time, so the build-time and run-time depen
> > it acceptable to use the upstream binary tarball as the .orig for a Debian
> > source package, as it is architecture-independent? Or must it compile from
> > the
> > Java source?
>
> If the package is in 'non-free', you don't even need the sources. IMHO (but
> IANAL), for a package to get i
> > it acceptable to use the upstream binary tarball as the .orig for a Debian
> > source package, as it is architecture-independent? Or must it compile from the
> > Java source?
>
> If the package is in 'non-free', you don't even need the sources. IMHO (but
> IANAL), for a package to get in 'm
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:22:41PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:55:48PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> > If the package is in 'non-free', you don't even need the
> > sources. IMHO (but IANAL), for a package to get in 'main', you HAVE
> > TO be able to compile it
[CCed to:
debian-java, where this thread originated
the wnpp bug for Enhydra
debian-devel, to get broader input on source packaging issues
Please trim CC list as appropriate]
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:55:48PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> If the package is in 'non-
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:22:41PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:55:48PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> > If the package is in 'non-free', you don't even need the
> > sources. IMHO (but IANAL), for a package to get in 'main', you HAVE
> > TO be able to compile i
[CCed to:
debian-java, where this thread originated
the wnpp bug for Enhydra
debian-devel, to get broader input on source packaging issues
Please trim CC list as appropriate]
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:55:48PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> If the package is in 'non
On Monday 4 September 2000, at 2 h 22, the keyboard of Matt Zimmerman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it acceptable to use the upstream binary tarball as the .orig for a Debian
> source package, as it is architecture-independent? Or must it compile from
> the
> Java source?
If the package is in '
On Monday 4 September 2000, at 2 h 22, the keyboard of Matt Zimmerman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it acceptable to use the upstream binary tarball as the .orig for a Debian
> source package, as it is architecture-independent? Or must it compile from the
> Java source?
If the package is in 'no
9 matches
Mail list logo
