Re: ITP: mozilla-ldapsdk (Java LDAP classes)

2000-05-24 Thread Stefan Gybas
Per Bothner wrote: > Seems unlikely. You should only get IncompatibleClassChangeError > if there is a bug in the Kaffe implementation, since the standard > classes are not allowed to change interfaces. I know this and I was actually taling about kaffe bugs. I did not experience such an exception

Re: ITP: mozilla-ldapsdk (Java LDAP classes)

2000-05-24 Thread Edouard G. Parmelan
Per Bothner wrote: > Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If I take kaffe's core classes the user might get an exception (like > > IncompatibleClassChangeError) when using the compiled classes with Sun's > > or IBM's classes > > Seems unlikely. You should only get IncompatibleClassCha

Re: ITP: mozilla-ldapsdk (Java LDAP classes)

2000-05-24 Thread Per Bothner
Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If I take kaffe's core classes the user might get an exception (like > IncompatibleClassChangeError) when using the compiled classes with Sun's > or IBM's classes Seems unlikely. You should only get IncompatibleClassChangeError if there is a bug in the

Re: ITP: mozilla-ldapsdk (Java LDAP classes)

2000-05-24 Thread Stefan Gybas
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote on debian-devel: > It is sufficient to compile with jikes and executes with kaffe (or with > the JVM of Mozilla). Try it! The problem is that I need core classes to compile with jikes. Now I have the choice between the original classes from Sun or kaffe's reimplementatio

Re: java installation...

2000-05-24 Thread Harvey Bath
Somebody else has also told me that(I didn't this before)Yes you are right but as I have also installed weblogic and it has default path for java was /usr. So, for testing purpose I have installed java under /usr & will do it again on /usr/local after testing... I dont think this is the problem

Re: A plea for a distribution of the XML/Java Apache tools

2000-05-24 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tuesday 23 May 2000, at 14 h 21, the keyboard of Mike Bilow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your real problem here is Sun, not the Linux distributors, because > the Sun licenses pretty much prevent redistribution of their tools. Thanks for the good explanation and proper pointing of responsabil

Re: java installation...

2000-05-24 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tuesday 23 May 2000, at 12 h 40, the keyboard of Bath Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have installed jdk1.2.2 under /usr dircetory on my debian > box(2.2.14).. Never do that. Under /usr, only packages are allowed. Other stuff should go under /usr/local.