Re: FAQ-java draft

On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 06:30, Seth R Arnold wrote: > Remco, could you elaborate on the SE, jbuilder, and netbeans? :) * jdk-1.2.2 SE? Standard Edition * jbuilder3 A java IDE from Inprise (written in java)

Re: FAQ-java draft

On Thursday 17 February 2000, at 21 h 4, the keyboard of Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I accept all kinds of suggestions and text written or new questions. I will not repeat what has already been said (gcj and jikes missing, no list for potato). I suggest to add

Re: FAQ-java draft

Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a wrote: > 3.1. What Java compilers are available in Debian? > - Kaffe 1.0.5 came with kjc (from GNU Kopi). I think it can be extracted from kaffe package and someone should create a separate debian package for it. It can b

Re: FAQ-java draft

Some additions and corrections. On Thu, Feb 17, 2000 at 21:04, Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a wrote: > 2.1. What java platforms are available in Debian? > - > > * Sun's jdk > > * guavac This is a compiler not a VM. It is no longer ma

Re: Sun JDK 1.2

Hmm, I don't have any problems with it. I installed it in /usr/local and included its bin directory in my PATH et voilá: $ java -version java version "1.2.2" Classic VM (build 1.2.2-L, green threads, nojit) On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 10:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > does anyone know how

Re: Sun JDK 1.2

> tschmid writes: tschmid> does anyone know how to get Sun's JDK 1.2 tschmid> (release-version) to work on a non-RH box? It still tschmid> complains about that /bin/realpath thingy. I also tried tschmid> on SuSE, without success. You need glibc-2.1 or better for the Sun JDK a

Sun JDK 1.2

Hi, does anyone know how to get Sun's JDK 1.2 (release-version) to work on a non-RH box? It still complains about that /bin/realpath thingy. I also tried on SuSE, without success. Tobias

Re: FAQ-java draft

> * kafee ^ kaffe > * ibm > 2.3. Why is not Sun's jdk 1.2 available? > > > Due to license problems. 2.3.1. Are there any chances that this will change? 2.3.2. Are there any inofficial deb packages? I consider it to

Re: FAQ-java draft

Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Again, GCJ gets ignored, even though it's the one most compatible other GNU programming languages. (It's based on and part of GCC.) Clearly, GCJ has a public relations problem. Please check out http://sourceware.cygnus.com/java/ --