Re: A packaging scheme...

1999-09-30 Thread Ean R . Schuessler
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 09:51:55AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > The main strength of the current approach is that it allows two different > implementations of SAX to live together, letting the user chose. Doing > otherwise would mean having a form of arbitration, to decide which one will

Re: A packaging scheme...

1999-09-30 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wednesday 29 September 1999, at 12 h 0, the keyboard of "Ean R . Schuessler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > a common library by organization. Let's say that you are writing an XML > program and are using classes from several different organizations. Having > to deal with classes coming out of: c

Re: A packaging scheme...

1999-09-30 Thread Daniel Barclay
> From: "Ean R . Schuessler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> .. > The thing is, even Sun doesn't follow their > own policy when it comes to most of the libraries. There is almost nothing > that is packaged under com.sun.* and the things that are you are advised > not to use. > .. > Again, Sun created a sen