On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 01:28:01PM -0400, Seth M. Landsman wrote:
> Yes and no. Sun has defined the API, which goes under java.* and
> the extended api, which goes under javax.*. However, they do define
> com.sun classes and net.jini classes, which do follow their definition.
> I've f
Okay, having said this won't be a debian requirement, I'm much
more comfortable discussing this at its merits, instead of arguing against
unnecessary incompatibility.
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 12:00:13PM -0500, Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 01:08:22PM -0400, Seth M. Lan
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 01:08:22PM -0400, Seth M. Landsman wrote:
> However, are programmers who write this software going to be
> willing to do this? I can't see gnu going with gpl.gnu and lgpl.gnu as
> their top level, nor can I see mozilla willing change to mpl.mozilla with
> all of their
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 11:39:51AM -0500, Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 10:58:53AM -0400, Seth M. Landsman wrote:
> > Umm, please don't. This would be wonderful if all systems were
> > debian and hetrogenius. However, what happens when I try to use my
> > software on a m
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 10:58:53AM -0400, Seth M. Landsman wrote:
> Umm, please don't. This would be wonderful if all systems were
> debian and hetrogenius. However, what happens when I try to use my
> software on a machine that isn't debian, like I do on a daily basis. This
> would make j
> Instead of org.gnu.regex.Regex you might have lgpl.regex.Regex. The
> nice thing being that you wouldn't see anything in lgpl.* linking in
> something from gpl.*, because that would break the license. There are
> some disadvantages, obviously, but the process of linking is tightly
> coupled with
On Tuesday 28 September 1999, at 22 h 5, the keyboard of Daniel Barclay
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A full Java implementation implements not just the language specification
> but also the Java virtual machine specification and the supposed API
> specification.
Right. For instance, kaffe, which
On Tuesday 28 September 1999, at 12 h 12, the keyboard of "Ean R . Schuessler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the irritating things about the Java packaging scheme is that you
> get this functional disassociation because of the organizational boundries.
>
> In other words, you have:
>
> ne
> On Tue, 28 Sep 1999 22:27:51 -0500, "Ean R . Schuessler" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
Ean> On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 07:37:12PM -0400, James LewisMoss wrote:
>> What if I want to release a regex package under the lgpl. Should
>> I have to rename mine so that it doesn't conflict with gn
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 07:37:12PM -0400, James LewisMoss wrote:
> What if I want to release a regex package under the lgpl. Should I
> have to rename mine so that it doesn't conflict with gnu's? This
> seems like it would place a large burden on different organizations
> not to step on each othe
> From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
..
> On Tuesday 14 September 1999, at 23 h 11, the keyboard of Julio
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can a virtual package have a version (to be set by a 'real' package that
> > implements it)? If so, it'd be useful to have java-virtual-machi
All,
I'm working on an Open Source RMI clone - got all done (including JDK
1.1 and 1.2 support). However I need to know how to generate the
interfaceHash number for JDK 1.1 style stubs but can't find the
algorithm anywhere?
Anyone know?
Thanks
Tim
--
Tim Wilkinson Tel:
12 matches
Mail list logo
