JFORK: Or a reasonable response to the Sun SCSL

1999-09-13 Thread Ean R . Schuessler
Hi, Ever since the SCSL was announced some of the same concepts have occupied my mind that have been recieving discussion on this list. Specifically, given the fact that the Sun SCSL is not compatible in any real sense with the tenets of the DFSG, what does the future hold for free software imp

Re: Debian Java outlook

1999-09-13 Thread Jim Franklin
Hi Stephane, It has been my experience that there are two types of engineers in the world. The ones who tell you why something can't be done and the ones who make the concept happen. My letter to you folks was to open up possibilities. Good luck. Jim Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > On Friday

Re: s/repository/classes/

1999-09-13 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Sunday 12 September 1999, at 4 h 33, the keyboard of =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=E1s_Lichtmaier?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > /usr/share/java/repository is a pretty ugly name, let's use the cooler > /usr/share/java/classes. Added to the policy, as a suggestion. > (Even if I think this approach

Re: Debian Java outlook

1999-09-13 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Friday 10 September 1999, at 10 h 50, the keyboard of Jim Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Perhaps the question of a "Debian Java Policy" might be handled as > part of the creation of a nonexistent non-profit debian-java > fellowship/organization/sub-debian_organization. Well, this is

Re: Debian Java outlook/ Re: kaffe orphaned?

1999-09-13 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Friday 10 September 1999, at 9 h 7, the keyboard of "Cris J. Holdorph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The debian-java list and Debian's interaction with Java has been > the only thing that has come close to pushing me away from Debian > entirely. I understand. Java on Debian is far from being