Re: Okay this is even odder

Good deal. Let me know if there is anything else I can do to help. On Fri, Aug 13, 1999 at 04:13:55PM -0700, Tim Wilkinson wrote: > Well I finally got IBMs VM on my box and compared it against my latest > Kaffe under JServ. IBM 70/sec, Kaffe 12/sec (about 6x slower). Not > good numbers if you as

Re: Okay this is even odder

Well I finally got IBMs VM on my box and compared it against my latest Kaffe under JServ. IBM 70/sec, Kaffe 12/sec (about 6x slower). Not good numbers if you ask me. As I've claimed before the JIT3 stuff while not yet complete even now is *not* 6x slower than IBMs VM. For non-concurrent tests (

Re: Okay this is even odder

Here are some results for you. It is interesting to note that performance under concurrency actually _degrades_ with the IBMJDK. Whether this is due to thread safty issues in AServe, idiosyncracies in the IBMJDK, or the finickiness of my tricked out dual Celeron is not clear to me. Apache obviously

Re: Sun's Community Licence (Was: Various issues: kaffe, compilers, freeness, etc.

[debian-legal: please CC: me, I'm not on this list.] On Wednesday 28 July 1999, at 11 h 24, the keyboard of Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - A total ban on SCSL code. The license is simply too dangerous to > > include in the Debian distribution, even under non-free. > > C

Re: Release Dates

On Saturday 7 August 1999, at 14 h 14, the keyboard of Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > November 1, 1999. ... > What remains to be done: I plan to add, among the release goals, a proper Java policy and a common setup for all Java stuff (at the present time, there is no coordina