On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 01:51:18PM -0700, Cris J. Holdorph wrote:
> Ok, but you can pick up books that document the Class Libraries and the
> language specification too. I'm sure, sooner, or later, there'll be a Jini
> book too, but I'll forgo that point for now. I simply think that we're
> first
Ean R . Schuessler Writes:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Cris J. Holdorph wrote:
> > You missed my point though. The section you quote, is from the SCSL, which
> > you read and agree to (either in writing or by clicking on "I accept").
> > You do not have to do either, matter of fact
On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Cris J. Holdorph wrote:
> You missed my point though. The section you quote, is from the SCSL, which
> you read and agree to (either in writing or by clicking on "I accept").
> You do not have to do either, matter of fact I doubt the SCSL is anywhere
> in
Ean R . Schuessler Writes:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 10:26:41AM -0700, Cris J. Holdorph wrote:
> > So would that cover if someone went to Amazon.com and ordered "The Java
> > Virtual Machine Specification", 2cd ed, by Lindholm & Yellin (ISBN
> > 0201432943)
> > and then implement according to that
On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 10:26:41AM -0700, Cris J. Holdorph wrote:
> So would that cover if someone went to Amazon.com and ordered "The Java
> Virtual Machine Specification", 2cd ed, by Lindholm & Yellin (ISBN 0201432943)
> and then implement according to that, then you say that Sun claims it as a
>
Ean R . Schuessler Writes:
> The SCSL is like the GPL, a viral license. The chief difference, however,
> is that the GPL makes everything it touches subject to free redistribution
> and a garauntee of source availability and the SCSL makes everything it
> touches subject to Sun licensing fees. The
On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 11:24:24AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > - A total ban on SCSL code. The license is simply too dangerous to
> > include in the Debian distribution, even under non-free.
>
> Could you elaborate on that?
The SCSL is like the GPL, a viral license. The chief differen
On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 10:53:38AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> Regarding the issue in the subject, I assume you have no part in the
> management of dinstall and of the override file?
Nope, unfortunatly.
--
___
Ean Schuessle
On Tuesday 27 July 1999, at 13 h 4, the keyboard of Stephane Bortzmeyer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for a set of autoconf macros to create configure scripts for them
They don't seem to exist, so here is my version:
divert(-1)
autoconf M4 macros for Java programs
Copyright Stephan
On Tuesday 27 July 1999, at 8 h 43, the keyboard of "Ean R . Schuessler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> continue our efforts in the face of the SCSL. I have read the SCSL
> quite carefully and I can tell you that it is utterly incompatible
> with any notion of free software.
OK.
> - A total ban
On Tuesday 27 July 1999, at 8 h 43, the keyboard of "Ean R . Schuessler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> like. I would tend to repeat the comments that others have stated
> regarding its weaknesses.
Caution: we are running straight into the problem that already killed the
previous proposals. "It i
On Tuesday 27 July 1999, at 8 h 43, the keyboard of "Ean R . Schuessler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Firstly, I'd like to address the notion that you can't do anything
> useful without commercial Java on your system. This seems patently
> false.
At least in slink, it is impossible. In potato,
On Tuesday 27 July 1999, at 8 h 32, the keyboard of "Ean R . Schuessler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is another way to handle this. You should set up a web based
> ..deb repository, [...] This will allow you to experiment more easily.
Well, at the present time, anyone could retrieve the p
13 matches
Mail list logo
