Re: Squid in unstable

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Russell Coker wrote: > Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 21:22:26 +0100 > From: Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian ISP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Squid in unstable > Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:40:30 -0600 (CST) > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Is anyone else hav

Re: Squid in unstable

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Russell Coker wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > What is the value of the cache_mem parameter in squid.conf? > > How much hard disk space for squid have you got? > > >From ps output: > proxy 922 2.3 73.8 420084 381420 ? SMar12 32:4

Re: Squid in unstable

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Russell Coker wrote: > Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:43:04 +0100 > From: Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Debian ISP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Squid in unstable > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The only other thing

Re: Squid in unstable

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Russell Coker wrote: > Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 21:22:26 +0100 > From: Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian ISP > Subject: Squid in unstable > Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:40:30 -0600 (CST) > Resent-From: debian-isp@lists.debian.org > > Is anyone else having probl

Re: Squid in unstable

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Russell Coker wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > What is the value of the cache_mem parameter in squid.conf? > > How much hard disk space for squid have you got? > > >From ps output: > proxy 922 2.3 73.8 420084 381420 ? SMar12 32:4

Re: Squid in unstable

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Russell Coker wrote: > Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 19:43:04 +0100 > From: Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Debian ISP > Subject: Re: Squid in unstable > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The only other thing that I can think o