MLM solution?

2002-07-08 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
Heya colleagues, I am wondering what your suggestion is for the following (typical I guess) ISP-need: Mailinglistmanager that supports - virtual hosts (and different setups for each) - translation / customization of all automatic generated messages - Newsletter-

Re: MLM solution?

2002-07-09 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Mark Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08.07.02 21:50]: > On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 21:17, Peter Hicks wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:22:00PM +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote: > > >Mailinglistmanager that supports > > >- virtual hos

Re: MLM solution?

2002-07-09 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Gavin Hamill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09.07.02 13:07]: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:52:14PM +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote: > > I thought of using courier-mlm too, because I am using courier-imap/pop > > already. It needs courier-maildrop though, > > The debian

Re: MLM solution?

2002-07-09 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Robert Waldner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09.07.02 14:17]: > Yes, ecartis meets those. You probably don't want to use the .deb, > though (but it's a straightforward install even without). > > Oh, and before anyone else brings it up: yes, the 8bit<->q/p - flaws are > finally fixed ;) . I've tried

Re: MLM solution?

2002-07-09 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Marcin Sochacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09.07.02 13:34]: > Mailman (http://www.list.org/) features: > > - administrative web-pages (for the customers) > YES, customizable. Is it possible for the subscribers to work without passwords? Can the web-pages be disabled for the subscribers?

Re: MLM solution?

2002-07-09 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Marcin Sochacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09.07.02 14:51]: > Working without the password also means, that users won't be allowed > to change any options, like digests, vacation feature, etc. Sure - they should not have to fiddle with any of those settings. Of course they are nice for people who kno

removing -MCPAN-packages?

2002-07-11 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
Hi guys, I had some problems to set up an actual pop-before-smtp for my postfix-courier(imap|pop)-system. So I tried to use Woody's package which didn't work correctly (because of a broken regexp that needs to be found... I guess) However. Because I've installed some needed perl modules using -M

Re: removing -MCPAN-packages?

2002-07-11 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Thomas -Balu- Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11.07.02 23:21]: > However. Because I've installed some needed perl modules using -MCPAN as > described in pop-before-smtp and then installing the .dep + > dependencies, I now have the perl modules two times and wonder how to >

Re: call me

2002-07-12 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Joe Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12.07.02 04:25]: > > On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 11:21 , mammanjos wrote: > > > FEDERAL MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM > > Is there a particular reason the list is not restricted to members only > posting? If someone has a second address they want to be able to post

virtual FTP hosting?

2002-07-14 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
Hey guys, I am wondering what FTPDs you are using to support the following: - non local users in (My)SQL-Database - permit access to these users only to ~/ (chroot) So far the only one I've found is proftpd. Other suggestions? Balu -- Windows is something like fas

Re: virtual FTP hosting?

2002-07-14 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ B.C.J.O <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [14.07.02 17:53]: > On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote: > > > I am wondering what FTPDs you are using to support the following: > > > > - non local users in (My)SQL-Database > > - permit acce

Re: virtual FTP hosting?

2002-07-15 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Dave Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [15.07.02 07:58]: > PureFTPd is very good (I use it here for the exact purpose above), plus it > has been written with security in mind. There are deb's for it but they are > VERY OLD. I floated the question of someone maintaining new packages for it > and som

Re: Questions about using Postfix-ldap package on Woody

2002-07-22 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [22.07.02 08:07]: > On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Jacky Hui Chun Kit wrote: > > > Thanks very much! But why postconf can't show that it supports LDAP? > > Interesting. > > Note: I'm not the postfix maintainer so this is a guess. > > postfix-ldap only contains the fi

DMA?

2002-07-23 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
Guess it's a FAQ, but do I have dma on? # hdparm -i /dev/hda /dev/hda: Model=ST340810A, FwRev=3.39, SerialNo=5FB3DCX2 Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs RotSpdTol>.5% } RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4 BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=2048kB, MaxMultSect=16,

Re: DMA?

2002-07-23 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Raghavendra Bhat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [23.07.02 20:06]: > -Balu- Walter posts : > > >> but do I have dma on? > > DMA is not enabled. Have you installed hdparm ? Of course, I couldn't have done "hdparm -i /dev/hda" without ;) > Do an `apt-get install > hdparm' and enable DMA by doing `hdp

Securing PHP-Module?

2002-07-24 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
How do you restrict your virtual WWWebspaces that have PHP enabled? So far I've found the following possible variables that could be set in a : open_basedir /virtual/example.com/htdocs safe_mode On doc_root /virtual/example.com/htdocs user_dir /virtual/example.com

Re: New Kernel for Server

2002-07-25 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Gene Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [24.07.02 21:28]: > I just updated the packages on my Potato-based server after the Woody-based > packages became stable over the weekend. The upgrade reported a possible > linking problem with the 2.2.17 kernel that the server is currently running. > I am looking

MLM solution?

2002-07-08 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
Heya colleagues, I am wondering what your suggestion is for the following (typical I guess) ISP-need: Mailinglistmanager that supports - virtual hosts (and different setups for each) - translation / customization of all automatic generated messages - Newsletter-s

Re: MLM solution?

2002-07-09 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Mark Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08.07.02 21:50]: > On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 21:17, Peter Hicks wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:22:00PM +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote: > > >Mailinglistmanager that supports > > >- virtual hos

Re: MLM solution?

2002-07-09 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Gavin Hamill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09.07.02 13:07]: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:52:14PM +0200, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote: > > I thought of using courier-mlm too, because I am using courier-imap/pop > > already. It needs courier-maildrop though, > > The debian

Re: MLM solution?

2002-07-09 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Robert Waldner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09.07.02 14:17]: > Yes, ecartis meets those. You probably don't want to use the .deb, > though (but it's a straightforward install even without). > > Oh, and before anyone else brings it up: yes, the 8bit<->q/p - flaws are > finally fixed ;) . I've tried e

Re: MLM solution?

2002-07-09 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Marcin Sochacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09.07.02 13:34]: > Mailman (http://www.list.org/) features: > > - administrative web-pages (for the customers) > YES, customizable. Is it possible for the subscribers to work without passwords? Can the web-pages be disabled for the subscribers?

Re: MLM solution?

2002-07-09 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Marcin Sochacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09.07.02 14:51]: > Working without the password also means, that users won't be allowed > to change any options, like digests, vacation feature, etc. Sure - they should not have to fiddle with any of those settings. Of course they are nice for people who know

removing -MCPAN-packages?

2002-07-11 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
Hi guys, I had some problems to set up an actual pop-before-smtp for my postfix-courier(imap|pop)-system. So I tried to use Woody's package which didn't work correctly (because of a broken regexp that needs to be found... I guess) However. Because I've installed some needed perl modules using -MC

Re: removing -MCPAN-packages?

2002-07-11 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Thomas -Balu- Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11.07.02 23:21]: > However. Because I've installed some needed perl modules using -MCPAN as > described in pop-before-smtp and then installing the .dep + > dependencies, I now have the perl modules two times and wonder how to >

Re: call me

2002-07-12 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Joe Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12.07.02 04:25]: > > On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 11:21 , mammanjos wrote: > > > FEDERAL MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM > > Is there a particular reason the list is not restricted to members only > posting? If someone has a second address they want to be able to post

virtual FTP hosting?

2002-07-14 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
Hey guys, I am wondering what FTPDs you are using to support the following: - non local users in (My)SQL-Database - permit access to these users only to ~/ (chroot) So far the only one I've found is proftpd. Other suggestions? Balu -- Windows is something like fast

Re: virtual FTP hosting?

2002-07-14 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ B.C.J.O <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [14.07.02 17:53]: > On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote: > > > I am wondering what FTPDs you are using to support the following: > > > > - non local users in (My)SQL-Database > > - permit acce

Re: virtual FTP hosting?

2002-07-15 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Dave Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [15.07.02 07:58]: > PureFTPd is very good (I use it here for the exact purpose above), plus it > has been written with security in mind. There are deb's for it but they are > VERY OLD. I floated the question of someone maintaining new packages for it > and some

Re: Questions about using Postfix-ldap package on Woody

2002-07-22 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [22.07.02 08:07]: > On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Jacky Hui Chun Kit wrote: > > > Thanks very much! But why postconf can't show that it supports LDAP? > > Interesting. > > Note: I'm not the postfix maintainer so this is a guess. > > postfix-ldap only contains the fil

DMA?

2002-07-23 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
Guess it's a FAQ, but do I have dma on? # hdparm -i /dev/hda /dev/hda: Model=ST340810A, FwRev=3.39, SerialNo=5FB3DCX2 Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs RotSpdTol>.5% } RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4 BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=2048kB, MaxMultSect=16,

Re: DMA?

2002-07-23 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Raghavendra Bhat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [23.07.02 20:06]: > -Balu- Walter posts : > > >> but do I have dma on? > > DMA is not enabled. Have you installed hdparm ? Of course, I couldn't have done "hdparm -i /dev/hda" without ;) > Do an `apt-get install > hdparm' and enable DMA by doing `hdpa

Securing PHP-Module?

2002-07-24 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
How do you restrict your virtual WWWebspaces that have PHP enabled? So far I've found the following possible variables that could be set in a : open_basedir /virtual/example.com/htdocs safe_mode On doc_root /virtual/example.com/htdocs user_dir /virtual/example.com/

Re: New Kernel for Server

2002-07-25 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Gene Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [24.07.02 21:28]: > I just updated the packages on my Potato-based server after the Woody-based > packages became stable over the weekend. The upgrade reported a possible > linking problem with the 2.2.17 kernel that the server is currently running. > I am looking a

Re: [Question] RAID-0 with raidtools2

2002-07-27 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ axacheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [27.07.02 11:37]: > i have 4 HDs that implement a RAID-0 my /etc/raidtab as follow : > > raiddev /dev/md0 > raid-level 0 > nr-raid-disks 3 You have 4 disks, but mention 3? > chunk-size 4 > device

AliasMatch / minimal match?

2002-07-27 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
I am stuck in setting up a regex to be used in the AliasMatch-directive in Apache. I want to make it possible to access some of my virtual webspaces even if the apache was not yet configured or DNS-update takes too long :) My virtual webspaces can be found in /home/vwww/example.com/host/htdocs/

/root/ drwxr-xr-x?

2002-07-31 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
# ls -lad /root/ drwxr-xr-x9 root root 4096 Jul 31 18:25 /root/ I wonder if /root/ shouldn't be accessible by root only per default? But in which package can I find this one? Should I make a bug-report or do you think this is normal? (It might be some kind of SuSE-remembrance from

Re: Maildirs in Debian

2002-08-01 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01.08.02 06:53]: > Some steps I remember: > > - Change /etc/login.defs to use: > QMAIL_DIR Maildir/ > #MAIL_DIR/var/spool/mail > MAIL_FILE Maildir/ /etc/pam.d/login sessionoptional pam_mail.so dir=~/Maildir/ Perhaps add a lin

Re: /root/ drwxr-xr-x?

2002-08-01 Thread Thomas -Balu- Walter
+ Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31.07.02 23:56]: > On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Thomas -Balu- Walter wrote: > > > # ls -lad /root/ > > drwxr-xr-x9 root root 4096 Jul 31 18:25 /root/ > > This is not the first time this comes up. Damn - this is my firs