Re: courier-imap + ldap

On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 02:51:16PM +0200, bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 15 lines which said: > i can't get working autentyfication by courier authldap. Courier-IMAP works here against an OpenLDAP server, through PAM. Wouldn't it be a better idea? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: courier-imap + ldap

On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:43:07PM +0200, Pascal Pucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 27 lines which said: > The documentation to install a mail service with ldap + courrier-imap + postfix or >sendmail or exim. > > Sorry it's in French. You forgot the address: http://www.alcove-lab

Recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (a VPN)

I have to connect two networks together and the virtual link needs to be safely encrypted (some users know SSH but some will just POP blindly and LDAP in woody is not SSLized anyway). I wonder what is the recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (to make a VPN) between two Debian boxes: - I

Re: Recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (a VPN)

On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 01:05:48PM -0400, Theodore Knab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 73 lines which said: > If you want an easy way to setup IPsec, contact a network security consultant that >understands it. No, I don't want an easy way, I want opinions and pointers. > If this is

Re: Recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (a VPN)

On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 11:25:24AM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 42 lines which said: > Using an IPSec VPN is probably the "best" way to do it. Why? (This is a real question: I see *many* solutions but I wonder why I would choose one above the others.) > FreeS/W

Re: zebra and bgp4

On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 12:17:54AM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain (home) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 17 lines which said: > How well does zebra get interfaced with cisco routers (using bgp4) ? Gitoyen uses two PC/Debian, at our two POPs. Peers are Ciscos. zebra is the sid version. Kernel i

[MY SOLUTION] Recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (a VPN)

On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 05:36:08PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 24 lines which said: > I have to connect two networks together and the virtual link needs to > be safely encrypted (some users know SSH but some will just POP > blindly and L

Re: Recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (a VPN)

On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 11:52:24AM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 42 lines which said: > I said that IPSec was probably the "best" way because it's > a standard protocol, with companies such as Microsoft and > Cisco supporting it Well, to set up a tunnel, standar

Re: New MASQUERADE problem

On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 12:44:15AM +0200, Luc MAIGNAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 34 lines which said: > * if the pc pings the external internet address of the router, it works fine > (ping succedded) > * if the pc tries to ping a host on the internet from its name : the > corresp

Re: Install on many machines

On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:51:52PM +0100, Marcel Hicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 30 lines which said: > Could anyone hint me to a decent way of handling > the setup and later updates? Can I have a bootable > CD and have predefined packages installed apt-get install replicator

Re: BGP / Zebra

On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:13:28PM +0100, Anders Gjære <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 82 lines which said: > The machine is running 2.2 kernel > > I don't think zebra is supported on 2.4.x kernels Zebra is supported and works perfectly fine on 2.4.x. Otherwise, see Russell's explan

Phantom routes in the Linux kernel, not replaced by Zebra

[I'm not sure of my choice of mailing lists, see the discussion at the end.] We use only Linux routers and, from time to time, we have phantom routes. I mean routes that once were legitimate (learned via BGP) but should have been suppressed when BGP info changed and were not. These routes ar

Re: XML - help needed

On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 08:48:08PM +0100, Marek L. Kozak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 18 lines which said: > I've allready installed (using debs) ibm-jdk1.1, tomcat, cocoon2 and > libapache-mod-jk, but still .xml pages cannot be seen - browsers want to > downloaded them instead. Why

procmail to deliver in a Maildir/ for every user?

Hello, I wish to use procmail as the system-wide delivery agent (the MTA is Postfix) *and* to have mail delivered in qmail-style Maildir/ by default (the POP and IMAP daemons are Courier, which only handles Maildirs). If I write a /etc/procmailrc: :0 $HOME/Maildir/ it works but it even does so

MacOS, Debian router and ADSL/PPPoE (OT Net Tuner does not work for HTTP)

I have a Debian router which connects to an ADSL/PPPoE line (therefore with a PPP interface and a MTU of 1492). Behind it are Linux machines, MS-Windows boxes and MacOS toys, all NATed (i have only one IP address) by Netfilter/iptables (router kernel is 2.4.7). The two first categories have no pr

Re: MacOS, Debian router and ADSL/PPPoE (OT Net Tuner does not work for HTTP)

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 07:44:17PM +0100, jernej horvat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 14 lines which said: > but if NAT gw machine has MTU already set do 1492, then there is no need for > "NATed" clients to change MTU. Are you sure? Because NAT does not change the packet size. If I

Re: MacOS, Debian router and ADSL/PPPoE (OT Net Tuner does not work for HTTP)

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 05:44:48PM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 27 lines which said: > I have a Debian router which connects to an ADSL/PPPoE line (therefore > with a PPP interface and a MTU of 1492). > > Behind it are Linux machines, MS

Re: Debian in 100 MB ?

On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 12:09:27PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 23 lines which said: > Is this the right way to do it ? I could not find a small debian based > distro with IPTABLES/DSL/ISDN support... http://www.pingoo.org/Routeur/English/welcome.html --

Re: procmail to deliver in a Maildir/ for every user?

On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 10:12:18AM +1100, Jeremy Lunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 18 lines which said: > Change your /etc/procmailrc to this and it'll fix your problem: > DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/ It works fine, thanks, that's what I was looking for. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM

Re: downgrading woody kernel 2.4 -> 2.2

On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 09:01:51AM +0100, David Biro (DaV3|D3) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 27 lines which said: > if not, just tell me please ;), so I decided to downgrade the kernel to > 2.2 (whis is available in woody). You use Debian compiled kernels? OK, just 'apt-get install

sendmail and virtual hosting: still a small annoying problem

I'm clearly rusty in sendmail (I now use Postfix but a customer wants to keep sendmail) and I have a small but annoying problem with virtual hosting. I have implemented: http://www.sendmail.org/virtual-hosting.html with a M4 configuration file as instructed above. It works fine except that T

Re: sendmail and virtual hosting: still a small annoying problem

On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 07:12:42PM -0500, Bulent Murtezaoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 15 lines which said: > What else do you have in your .mc ? Masquerading options maybe? Ooops, here it is (domain names changed). Can I have both masquerading and virtusertable or should I tr

Re: two ethernet without routing

On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:27:31AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 18 lines which said: > How can I deactivate the routing option betwen cards? /etc/network/options: ip_forward=no Check with 'cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward'. > There have to be some kind o

Re: two ethernet without routing

On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:38:53AM -0800, Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 37 lines which said: > You shouldn't have to setup a firewall as a workaround either. If your NIC > card is configured for a particular IP and you want to stop it, then > simply unplugging the ether

Re: sendmail and virtual hosting: still a small annoying problem

On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 11:21:17AM -0500, Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 42 lines which said: > You have FEATURE(`allmasquerade') Correct? You were right... > Try FEATURE(`limited_masquerade') and add *ONLY* the hosts you to > masquerade (localhost, etc) to class {M}

Re: cold fusion 4.5 on Debian

On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 08:47:29AM -0500, Thedore Knab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 22 lines which said: > Is anyone running Cold Fusion 4.5 on Debian ? Debian is about free software, so probably not many (at least I hope so). > Are there any other simple packages that I might rec

Re: apache+php+mod_perl

On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 11:14:33PM +0100, Grischa Schuering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 10 lines which said: > we have problems with a apache running mod_perl scripts as well as > php4 scripts. We have a woody box with active mod_perl and PHP4 scripts and it seems to work fine. >

Re: apache BASIC authentication w/large userbase

On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 06:35:22PM -0500, Jeff S Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 39 lines which said: > would not go for that because apparently a disproportionate number of > their end-users disable cookies in their web browser. Stupid media > privacy paranoia. You are wrong.

Re: OFFTOPIC: LDAP AND SERVICES ISP

On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 06:15:18AM +0200, Ángel Carrasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 103 lines which said: > Do you know if exists any documentation or guide or similar to implement > these services using LDAP or other systems? Documentation is scattered. You'll have to spend time

Re: apache BASIC authentication w/large userbase

On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:07:37PM -0500, Jeff S Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 47 lines which said: > LDAP resources or experience in-house, but honestly would like to move > to it Not to discourage you but do not take that move lightly: LDAP is a huge and difficult beast. >

Re: Network Question

On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 11:34:21AM +1000, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 84 lines which said: > This is what I have done in the network file. IP's are just an example Very bad idea. How are we supposed to help without actual information? > My problem is I cannot ping 210.16.240

Re: File contents

On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 08:39:02PM +1000, Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 32 lines which said: > perl is the ideal tool to do this. No, you should use Python. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P

Re: File contents

On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 06:21:18PM +1000, Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 27 lines which said: > does python have an edit-in-place command line option, like perl's -i? Unfortunately no, but you can easily write a script which will do the same. Here is an example, quick an

Re: apache broke

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:45:44AM +0100, Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 39 lines which said: > Since I upgrade my SID box yesterday, I've been having major First, sid is named unstable (sid == System In Development) and for a reason. > my Apache. Probably the Glibc problem

Re: New BIND 4 & 8 Vulnerabilities

On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 08:09:59PM +0100, Tobias Kuhrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 59 lines which said: > bind9 is also supporting ACL and other new features. so it is > a good idea to use bind9.x.x instead of bind8.x.x Bind9 is *much* slower http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/arc

Debian package of bigwig 1.2

In case someone is interested, I've made a Debian package of bigwig 1.2 here: ftp://ftp.internatif.org/pub/debian/UNOFFICIAL/ Debian users can fetch it with apt or by hand. BigWig is a really interesting tool to create interactive Web servers in a high-level fash

PAM (?) and anonymous CVS with SSH problem (Was: Problem accessing your CVS repo of Java Autoconf macros

I manage an anonymous CVS server (its user's guide is ), using SSH, as described in: http://kitenet.net/programs/sshcvs/ It worked in 'slink' and fails with 'potato' (because of PAM, I assume). The message I get in the server's logs is: Ju

Re: PAM (?) and anonymous CVS with SSH problem (Was: Problem accessing your CVS repo of Java Autoconf macros

On Monday 19 June 2000, at 15 h 3, the keyboard of Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > It worked in 'slink' and fails with 'potato' > > It works in potato with me, I never even used it in slink. Are you using >

An (unofficial) Debian package for Freenet

For those who are interested in experimentations with the most free network file sharing system, Freenet , I made an unofficial Debian package. ftp://ftp.internatif.org/pub/debian/UNOFFICIAL/ or, with apt: deb ftp://ftp.internatif.org/pub/debian/UNOFFICIAL ./ an

Re: Virtual Domain Solution

On Friday 7 July 2000, at 14 h 48, the keyboard of Ryan Hayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the best solution for > ISP hosting of virtual domains? Are there any integrated packages > which can handle web/email/ftp access on a per-domain, per-user > basis? I don't know (see Webmin) but I

Re: ISDN & MRTG (or similar)

On Tuesday 5 September 2000, at 12 h 57, the keyboard of Robert Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Previously they were running on our PortMaster 3 and we were using MRTG > to monitor them. Is there a way we can monitor them with MRTG on the > linux box, Yes. Run a SNMP daemon.

Re: Suggestion for Mail Archiving Software

On Friday 8 September 2000, at 13 h 24, the keyboard of "I. Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anybody get experience with and/or suggestions for mail > archiving software. MHonarc, without a doubt. http://www.mhonarc.org/ Incredibly configurable. Debian package of the same name. > I

Re: copyrights liability question

On Monday 19 March 101, at 12 h 11, the keyboard of Allen Ahoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > as an ISP where does the line go for how liable we are for client's > copyrights violations? It depends on the country where you live. Which one is it?

Re: First ISDN connection kills IP-route

On Tuesday 20 March 2001, at 12 h 46, the keyboard of Bernd Harmsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I habe a problem with the first ISDN connection after starting > isdnutils. Every additional route defined in device.ipppX is removed > after this first connection. Check /etc/ppp/ip-up.d. A script

Re: First ISDN connection kills IP-route

On Wednesday 21 March 2001, at 10 h 56, the keyboard of Bernd Harmsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the newer kernels you have to place "route" as the very last command > before the dialout command. Otherwise the kernel will delete the route. >

Re: Changing servers

On Wednesday 21 March 2001, at 8 h 34, the keyboard of Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RedHat) to a debian server. I'm trying to figure out a > way that will cause least mail delays to our customers > whilst the dns records propagate (The IP's are going to > change for the mail server). a) l

Cannot login with pam_ldap

I have a LDAP server on a Debian machine, it runs fine (gq and ldapsearch show that the posixAccount I add are indeed present). But the pam_ldap module does not allow logins. If I give a wrong password, I get a second 'Password:' request from login (since I indicated pam_ldap as 'sufficient', not

Re: Cannot login with pam_ldap

On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 06:21:59PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 37 lines which said: > Apr 12 19:30:41 progress login[1149]: pam_ldap: error trying to bind as user > "cn=Vladimir Toto,ou=People,dc=netaktiv,dc=com" (Invalid credenti

Re: get school connected to the inet

On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 10:26:26PM +0200, Joachim Schiele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 37 lines which said: > i have to connect a school to the internet but i have to avoid that the > users(kids) look at certain webpages with criminal and sexual backgrounds Interesting set of values

Re: Authentication schemes

On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 10:15:29AM -0600, elyograg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 57 lines which said: > Some goals for whatever we implement: We have almost exactly the same goals. We seem more advanced (we have an experimental LDAP testbed) but it is not yet in production so take it

Re: Authentication schemes

On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 09:00:54AM +0200, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 49 lines which said: > How do you implement ACLs per-branch? It seems to me that OpenLDAP only > supports this through regular expressions which are very slow. If you have I did not try it yet bu

Re: An LDAP authentication howto for Debian?

On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 12:34:02PM +1000, Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 21 lines which said: > The LDP has a perfectly good set of documents already; there's no need to > duplicate the good work already done by them. I recently configured LDAP for my company and I 100% agre

Re: setting up my own apt source

On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:30:21AM +0200, Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 21 lines which said: > I need to set up an apt source for my work, where we can store our custom > made packages and kernels. I know that this can be done using > dpkg-scanpackages, but I can't find any h

Re: courier-imap + ldap

On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 02:51:16PM +0200, bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 15 lines which said: > i can't get working autentyfication by courier authldap. Courier-IMAP works here against an OpenLDAP server, through PAM. Wouldn't it be a better idea?

Re: courier-imap + ldap

On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:43:07PM +0200, Pascal Pucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 27 lines which said: > The documentation to install a mail service with ldap + courrier-imap + > postfix or sendmail or exim. > > Sorry it's in French. You forgot the address: http://www.alcove-lab

Recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (a VPN)

I have to connect two networks together and the virtual link needs to be safely encrypted (some users know SSH but some will just POP blindly and LDAP in woody is not SSLized anyway). I wonder what is the recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (to make a VPN) between two Debian boxes: - I t

Re: Recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (a VPN)

On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 01:05:48PM -0400, Theodore Knab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 73 lines which said: > If you want an easy way to setup IPsec, contact a network security consultant > that understands it. No, I don't want an easy way, I want opinions and pointers. > If this is

Re: Recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (a VPN)

On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 11:25:24AM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 42 lines which said: > Using an IPSec VPN is probably the "best" way to do it. Why? (This is a real question: I see *many* solutions but I wonder why I would choose one above the others.) > FreeS/WA

Re: zebra and bgp4

On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 12:17:54AM +0200, Fabrice Lorrain (home) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 17 lines which said: > How well does zebra get interfaced with cisco routers (using bgp4) ? Gitoyen uses two PC/Debian, at our two POPs. Peers are Ciscos. zebra is the sid version. Kernel is

Re: New MASQUERADE problem

On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 12:44:15AM +0200, Luc MAIGNAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 34 lines which said: > * if the pc pings the external internet address of the router, it works fine > (ping succedded) > * if the pc tries to ping a host on the internet from its name : the > correspo

Re: Install on many machines

On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:51:52PM +0100, Marcel Hicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 30 lines which said: > Could anyone hint me to a decent way of handling > the setup and later updates? Can I have a bootable > CD and have predefined packages installed apt-get install replicator

Re: BGP / Zebra

On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:13:28PM +0100, Anders Gjære <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 82 lines which said: > The machine is running 2.2 kernel > > I don't think zebra is supported on 2.4.x kernels Zebra is supported and works perfectly fine on 2.4.x. Otherwise, see Russell's explana

Re: procmail to deliver in a Maildir/ for every user?

On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 10:12:18AM +1100, Jeremy Lunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 18 lines which said: > Change your /etc/procmailrc to this and it'll fix your problem: > DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/ It works fine, thanks, that's what I was looking for.

Re: concurrent POP3 and IMAP servers?

On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 11:56:49PM +0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 34 lines which said: > I am using postfix, how to setup the smtp to deliver to maildir ? (Not the SMTP, the MDA, message delivery agent.) Postfix comes with heavily commented configuration files

Re: downgrading woody kernel 2.4 -> 2.2

On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 09:01:51AM +0100, David Biro (DaV3|D3) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 27 lines which said: > if not, just tell me please ;), so I decided to downgrade the kernel to > 2.2 (whis is available in woody). You use Debian compiled kernels? OK, just 'apt-get install

Re: apache broke

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 10:45:44AM +0100, Teun Vink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 39 lines which said: > Since I upgrade my SID box yesterday, I've been having major First, sid is named unstable (sid == System In Development) and for a reason. > my Apache. Probably the Glibc problem

Re: New BIND 4 & 8 Vulnerabilities

On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 08:09:59PM +0100, Tobias Kuhrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 59 lines which said: > bind9 is also supporting ACL and other new features. so it is > a good idea to use bind9.x.x instead of bind8.x.x Bind9 is *much* slower http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/arc

Re: sane trouble-ticket systems

On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 09:20:39PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 51 lines which said: > Currently we're using RT, and IMHO it sucks. Some of the things you want can be done with RT. > (i.e. no need to put a ticket number in the mail subject). Run rt-mailga

Re: is there any DHCP server using PostgreSQL as a config source?

On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Miernik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 9 lines which said: > DHCP servers usually store the MAC -> IP resolution in a > /etc/dhcpd.conf file. I am looking for one that can use a PostgreSQL > database for that puropuse. IMHO, it is not a good id

Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 06:34:17PM +0300, Evgeny Boksha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 13 lines which said: > please - tell me something about preferred vesion of BIND: 8 or 9 ? It is partly a matter of taste. Sooner or later, BIND8 will be officially unsupported so I would not advise

Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:53:53PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 25 lines which said: > (powerdns is fastest authoritive dns server around You must be kidding, on every benchmark we performed, PowerDNS is much slower than BIND (even PowerDNS with its BIND bac

Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:53:53PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 25 lines which said: > - v8 is stable 8.4 broke TSIG (secure zone transfers, RFC 2845), which worked before. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 12:03:43PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 17 lines which said: > > That's nsd and it is no longer a project. > > URL? apt-get install nsd :-) Upstream is http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/index.html> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Re: Watchdog Program

On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:05:53PM -0300, Matias G. Lambert ( OSInet ) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 36 lines which said: > take a look at http://www.nagios.org Why not mon, much simpler and which has a command-line interface? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

Re: Question about system accounts in LDAP.

On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 05:13:29PM +0300, ? ? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 35 lines which said: > that, to have the session and etc. things, i need to use the NSS system > (/etc/nsswitch.conf) with the nss-pgsql module, not the PAM stuff Of course, because some functions do n

Re: Question about system accounts in LDAP.

On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 11:15:17AM +0200, Leonardo Boselli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 23 lines which said: > I am thinking about ist: is possible to use the ldap authentication > for ALL BUT imap and ftp (that should use the passwd file I do not really see why you want that (

Re: Watchdog Program

On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 02:02:23AM +0200, Richard Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 32 lines which said: > you could try BigBrother (http://bb4.com/) Heavily non-free. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: RIPE Autonomously System: Question?

On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:01:29AM +0300, kgb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 56 lines which said: > Yes and i thing that, do you know with mine architecture how traffic can > shift my PC without problem? Very difficult to tell, it depends on many things (for instance, on the typical si

Re: Gated vs Zebra

On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:29:58AM +0300, kgb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 39 lines which said: > Which software is more good Gated or Zebra? Gated is non-free and non-maintained. Zebra is free but no longer maintained. Use Quagga. Or start with Zebra if you don't want to run sid, it

Re: domain tracking

On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 05:12:04PM -0500, Rod Rodolico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 93 lines which said: > I have a totally junk perl script that does it. How does it work? If it just queries the DNS, it is useless for .com or .net where the DNS is refreshed only twice a day. So, a

Re: domain tracking

On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 02:34:49PM -0400, Theodore Knab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 74 lines which said: > I wonder if anyone could refer me to a domain tracker ? ... > http://easternshoreheritage.org Do note also that the domain tracker have to respect some rules and not, for insta

[IMAP] [Courier] Change the folder separator?

The courier-imap IMAP server uses the dot ('.') as a separator for IMAP folders and not the slash ('/'). So, IMAP subfolders are not nice Unix subdirectories. Is there a way to change it? Reading the source code, it seems it is not easy, there is not even a '#define FOLDER_SEP .', rather the liter

Re: [IMAP] [Courier] Change the folder separator?

On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 09:22:40AM -0500, Dale E Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 25 lines which said: > I thought that you just had to have, for example: > Maildir/.folder1 And if I create, from an IMAP client, a subfolder "foo" of "folder1", I get Maildir/.folder1.foo instead of

Re: Software for a NIC (Network Information Center)

On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 09:13:12AM +0100, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 29 lines which said: > There are some Contries in the World without a NIC Not many: you just need one clerical worker to claim "We have a NIC" :-) > Because I am working on 3rd World Projects I

Re: bind9 vs tinydns vs others

On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 04:46:55PM +0100, David Zejda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 11 lines which said: > what do you prefer for authoritative dns? nsd. See http://www.nic-generique.prd.fr/sheets/practical/nameserver-en> for a good reason. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE

Re: bind9 vs tinydns vs others

On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:04:26PM +0100, David Zejda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 29 lines which said: > flat files can't be "down". wouldn't be better to generate flat > files from the backend db to avoid such risks? I agree. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: Multiple Server routet to one location

On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 10:24:32PM +0100, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 61 lines which said: > The internet connectivity is in some locations only V.90 or ISDN, so > Web/Mail-Services are not possible permanently. ... > ...and if I collect the Mail in Strasbourg, how

Re: HTTP latency ..urgent

On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 01:40:00AM -0800, suhail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 35 lines which said: > I am performing an experiment of effects of DDoS attacks on certain > metrics like HTTP web latency , DNS latency. I need to know how does > one measure the HTTP latency(time between i

Re: HTTP latency ..urgent

On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:53:06PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 41 lines which said: > Another piece of software which will do this and much more is called > smokeping, I know, smokeping is a graphing layer above other programs (including echoping). -- To

Re: Monitoring software

On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 11:23:24AM +0200, Craig Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 13 lines which said: > Does anyone know what monitoring software we could use to monitor > servers and routing devices? I use and like mon (http://www.kernel.org/software/mon/ and as a Debian packa

Rotating mail.log daily: a problem

I try to rotate the mail logs of a big mail server more often than the default (weekly). I added this to /etc/logrotate.d : # http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/09/msg01310.html # sysklogd rotates file and "weekly" is hardwired in it. We add this file # to override it. /var/log/mail.log

Re: Rotating mail.log daily: a problem

On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 09:59:59AM -0400, Dominique Fortier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 52 lines which said: > rotate 52<- that does'nt seem right Why? logrotate(1) rotate count Log files are rotated count times before being removed or mailed

Re: Rotating mail.log daily: a problem

On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 02:48:32PM +0100, Brett Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 55 lines which said: > So, in summary, change: > for LOG in `syslogd-listfiles` > to: > for LOG in `syslogd-listfiles -s "mail.*"` > in /etc/cron.daily/sysklogd It worked. Many thanks.

Documentation of big "mail systems"?

I'm currently writing a proposal for a webmail service for, say, 50 000 to 500 000 users. I'm looking for description of existing "big mail" systems, using technologies like scalemail (http://scalemail.sourceforge.net/), specially with an emphasis on the storage subsystem for the servers (my weak p

Re: Documentation of big "mail systems"?

On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 09:41:43PM +1000, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 39 lines which said: > Getting servers that each have 200G or 300G of storage is easy. For a mail server, it means either 1G per user (like gmail gives you) for only 300 users or 10M (much less than

Re: Documentation of big "mail systems"?

On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 05:04:16PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 28 lines which said: > Debian does not need the storage for developers to store their mail > on the project's servers. Sorry, wrong thread. The thread I launched on "big mail systems" have nothing

Re: Documentation of big "mail systems"?

On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 11:18:55PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 19 lines which said: > I'm currently writing a proposal for a webmail service for, say, 50 > 000 to 500 000 users. I'm looking for description of existing "

Re: [OT] Debian package differences from upstream

On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 08:40:21AM -0500, Mark Bucciarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 21 lines which said: > I've done apt-get source and poked around a bit but could not tell > where the Debian patches made to upstream live. $PACKAGE_$VERSION.diff.gz (Some big packages use a more

Re: which dns server to use ?

On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 06:30:48PM +0200, Markus Welsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 29 lines which said: > Which dns server would you suggest ? Why not PowerDNS http://www.powerdns.com/>, the only one which is fully extensible? > BIND ( http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/ )

Re: Network monitor

On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 09:37:12AM -0700, brian moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 22 lines which said: > I use 'mon' (in the package of the same name). Trivial to add new > monitors if you know a bit of Perl I use and like mon as well and you do not need Perl to write custom monit

  1   2   >