Re: snmpd vulnerabilities

On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 14:01, James wrote: > does anybody know if the package > snmpd 4.1.1-2 (stable) > is vulnerable as regards to the cert advisory ? Yes, it is. snmp 4.2.3 is not vulnerable ... bye, Roland -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mediaWays GmbH, 33311 Guetersloh Preliminary

Re: DNS servers

Hello all, Craig Sanders wrote: btw, i have learnt the tinydns-data format. i know how it works, i can read it and i can write it. i simply don't like it. i consider it to be ugly and error-prone, so i don't use djbdns. Thats one of the best opinions I read in this discussion. It shows very

Re: snmpd vulnerabilities

On Wed, 2002-02-13 at 14:01, James wrote: > does anybody know if the package > snmpd 4.1.1-2 (stable) > is vulnerable as regards to the cert advisory ? Yes, it is. snmp 4.2.3 is not vulnerable ... bye, Roland -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mediaWays GmbH, 33311 Guetersloh Preliminary o

Re: DNS servers

Hello all, Craig Sanders wrote: btw, i have learnt the tinydns-data format. i know how it works, i can read it and i can write it. i simply don't like it. i consider it to be ugly and error-prone, so i don't use djbdns. Thats one of the best opinions I read in this discussion. It shows very much