Hi Maarten,
I believe there's a linuxconf module for Apache
(http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf/). Maybe you can use that?
Regards,
Rodi.
On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 10:16, Maarten van der Hoef wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I was wondering if there are tools/libs which handle the complete
> apache confi
Hi Jose,
Maybe your smtpd (smtp/smtps) is chrooted? Check your master.cf for
this. And for shadow auth you probably also have to add postfix to the
shadow group..
Hope this helps :)
Regards,
-Rodi
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 00:19, Jose Alberto Guzman wrote:
> I'm trying to get posfix authenticate
**
DROPPRIVS=yes
SHELL=/bin/bash
MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir
DEFAULT=$MAILDIR/new
:0fw
* < 5
| /usr/bin/spamc
--
R.M. Evers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 11:18, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:47:07AM +0200, R.M. Evers wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've been researching what would be our best option for converting our
> > old Redhat mailserver with Sendmail to something better.
Hi,
In Postfix, is it possible to accept mail for different subdomains? An
example of what I am trying to accomplish:
--
/etc/postfix/virtual:
testdomain.net DOMAIN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] user1
sub1.testdomain.net DOMAIN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] user2
s
Sorry, found the problem.. I had no MX records defined for the
subdomains.. Stupid..
Sorry..
Regards,
-Rodi.
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 11:19, R.M. Evers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In Postfix, is it possible to accept mail for different subdomains? An
> example of what I am trying t
alias
for our employees, so that they can send an e-mail to, for example
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]", which would deliver to all of our
mailboxes. But, I only want this alias to be available for our own
employees. Not for the outside world, of course..
Would this be possible?
Regards,
--
R.M
-)
Thanks again,
-Rodi
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 23:17, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On [26/09/03 13:40], R.M. Evers wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > This could be a stupid question, but I'm trying to accomplish the
> > following:
>
> > In our company, we run a Debian mails
g when you set it to allow
> subscribers only to post. We are only ~7 people in our company - still
> it makes sense for us to use mailman instead of a list in postfix.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Michael
>
> R.M. Evers wrote:
> > Thank you all for your input. The method
dded in the first place? One would be
enough..
Regards,
--
R.M. Evers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
doesn't exchange come with some pop-connector tool to download mail from
a pop-server? i know it's not the coolest solution, though i believe it
works ;-)
regards,
-rodi
On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 20:52, Jody Grafals wrote:
> Spoon feeding Exchange with Sendmail
>
> Is it possible to somehow use my
hi everyone,
i'm running spamassassin/unstable through amavisd-new/unstable on a
postfix/stable mailserver (debian/stable). it seems like spamassassin
ignores the per-user settings in ~/.spamassassin (like a personal
'required_hits'). is there a way to fix this? it did work before when i
ran spama
hi everyone,
i work for a small ISP, and not too far from now, we are going to move
all our colo- and web-servers to another datacenter/colocator. when
doing this, i would like to add a traffic shaper to our configuration.
now, i'm not exactly what you would call a networking guru, so i find
this
hi everyone,
thanx for the tips om my last traffic shaping question. i've managed to
get a debian bridge (ebtables / bridge-nf patched 2.4.22 kernel w/
newest 'tc') up and running which does firewalling and outgoing shaping.
now, i wanted to try the incoming ingress shaping, but i cant get it to
w
ve
this shortcoming simply just by dropping packets. i've read about
working configs on the web (mainly for use with syn-flood protection),
though none in a bridge-config. maybe my understanding of ingress is way
off.. :-)
regards,
-rodi.
On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 19:21, Clement Hermann w
hi robert,
it sounds to me like the client's trying to connect in PASV mode, then
fails because of incorrect firewall settings (or a server not supporting
PASV), and falls back to PORT mode after a while. try switching off PASV
mode in the client, and see if it's still slow.
regards,
-rodi
On T
On Sun, 2004-08-15 at 18:08, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> hello.
>
> we are planning to set up a serial-ATA based fileserver (>1 Terabyte).
> the host will be dedicated solely to serving files (via samba and nfs
> (and probably appletalk), so i was thinking about a software-raid solution.
>
> ar
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 10:19, Russell Coker wrote:
> That read speed is quite poor. I would expect to see better speeds than that
> from a single S-ATA disk! For several years people have been reporting
> better speeds than that from 3ware controllers (although almost no-one tested
> with as fe
Hi Maarten,
I believe there's a linuxconf module for Apache
(http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf/). Maybe you can use that?
Regards,
Rodi.
On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 10:16, Maarten van der Hoef wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I was wondering if there are tools/libs which handle the complete
> apache confi
hi everyone,
i work for a small ISP, and not too far from now, we are going to move
all our colo- and web-servers to another datacenter/colocator. when
doing this, i would like to add a traffic shaper to our configuration.
now, i'm not exactly what you would call a networking guru, so i find
this
hi everyone,
thanx for the tips om my last traffic shaping question. i've managed to
get a debian bridge (ebtables / bridge-nf patched 2.4.22 kernel w/
newest 'tc') up and running which does firewalling and outgoing shaping.
now, i wanted to try the incoming ingress shaping, but i cant get it to
w
ve
this shortcoming simply just by dropping packets. i've read about
working configs on the web (mainly for use with syn-flood protection),
though none in a bridge-config. maybe my understanding of ingress is way
off.. :-)
regards,
-rodi.
On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 19:21, Clement Hermann w
hi robert,
it sounds to me like the client's trying to connect in PASV mode, then
fails because of incorrect firewall settings (or a server not supporting
PASV), and falls back to PORT mode after a while. try switching off PASV
mode in the client, and see if it's still slow.
regards,
-rodi
On T
23 matches
Mail list logo
