> A while back, AT&T had a publicly accessible router for doing route
lookups
> and stuff like that. It supposedly knew about the whole world. The
special
> thing about this router was that you didn't need a user name or password
to
> log on with. It just gave you the IOS prompt. I haven't bee
Haven't followed the thread closely, but have you guys looked at TCP ECN as
a possible problem? If not, this command "echo 0 >
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn" may help...
Matt.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oops, need to reply-all...
Matt.
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Steve Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: bt adsl
> > Is anyone else here who denys connections to users w
Try this - hash out (or remove) the statements "CONFIG_X86_USE_3DNOW" from
/arch/i386/config.in then run "make oldconfig" and
rebuild the kernel as usual.
Matt.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 11:37 PM
Subject: Pro
Its possible, in fact there has been a thread running over that last week or
so about defining rules for use in this way. The best place to start is
probably http://bridge.sourceforge.net/ as that has the relevant patches.
Matt.
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It is a pretty thing, and can virtually be plugged in anywhere to provide
> instant firewall protection :-)
Yeah, I use it at home on my DSL line as BT (in the UK) don't allow any
routing at layer 3 to put a firewall in any other way.
Matt.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: "transparent" firewall possible?
also sprach Matt Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.02.06.2215 +0100]:
> > It is a pretty thing, and can virtually be plugged in anywher
> I found that Linux does provide Bridging support, but the bridging
> support in 2.4.x Kernels is not tied into any firewall support.
> FreeBSD does have this, so does the 2.5.x Linux kernel. I guess if
> people want to use Linux as a bandwidth shaping/ firewall bridge they
> will have to wait fo
> I was wondering if any of you have any experience running a game server
> under Debian. Also wondering if you know the CPU/memory/bandwidth
> requirements of such a project. Thanks,
I run Counter Strike, Day of Defeat and Vampire Slayer Half-Life mod servers
under Debian. They take anything up
Put box 2 on 192.168.3.X instead. I suspect you have box 1 & box 2 setup with
a subnet mask that makes them think they are on the same subnet and so ARP
for the address locally instead of passing the traffic to your router.
Matt.
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 03:23:01 Peter Billson wrote:
> I am trying
> A while back, AT&T had a publicly accessible router for doing route
lookups
> and stuff like that. It supposedly knew about the whole world. The
special
> thing about this router was that you didn't need a user name or password
to
> log on with. It just gave you the IOS prompt. I haven't been
Try this - hash out (or remove) the statements "CONFIG_X86_USE_3DNOW" from
/arch/i386/config.in then run "make oldconfig" and
rebuild the kernel as usual.
Matt.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 11:37 PM
Subject: Problems with Duron Pro
Its possible, in fact there has been a thread running over that last week or
so about defining rules for use in this way. The best place to start is
probably http://bridge.sourceforge.net/ as that has the relevant patches.
Matt.
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It is a pretty thing, and can virtually be plugged in anywhere to provide
> instant firewall protection :-)
Yeah, I use it at home on my DSL line as BT (in the UK) don't allow any
routing at layer 3 to put a firewall in any other way.
Matt.
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: "transparent" firewall possible?
also sprach Matt Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.02.06.2215 +0100]:
> > It is a pretty thing, and can virtually be plugged in anywhere to
provide
> > ins
Er, no DMA in the kernel?
Matt.
- Original Message -
From: "Maarten Vink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter Billson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: SLow server
> Try vmstat and check for disk I/O when users are accessing their
mailboxes?
>
> Maa
> I found that Linux does provide Bridging support, but the bridging
> support in 2.4.x Kernels is not tied into any firewall support.
> FreeBSD does have this, so does the 2.5.x Linux kernel. I guess if
> people want to use Linux as a bandwidth shaping/ firewall bridge they
> will have to wait for
lsattr /usr/bin/du - chances are it was made immutable ('i' attribute).
Matt.
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Lay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Roger Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:10 AM
Subject: Re: apt-get dist-upgrade problem
> First
lsattr /usr/bin/du - chances are it was made immutable ('i' attribute).
Matt.
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Lay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Roger Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:10 AM
Subject: Re: apt-get dist-upgrade problem
> First thing I would be d
Put box 2 on 192.168.3.X instead. I suspect you have box 1 & box 2 setup with
a subnet mask that makes them think they are on the same subnet and so ARP
for the address locally instead of passing the traffic to your router.
Matt.
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 03:23:01 Peter Billson wrote:
> I am trying
20 matches
Mail list logo
