Here's a question that has always been bugging me.
Ever since we moved from smail to exim many years ago at my isp, exim
never seems to discard messages in the input queue.
Even though the single retry rule is the stock one (which retrys for
something like 4 days), we end up with stuff that is
Maarten Vink wrote:
Does the output of the "mailq" command provide any useful information
about these messages? My first guess would be that you're dealing with
"frozen" messages
Yup. A lot of them are frozen.
If that is the case, have a look at the "timeout_frozen_after"
setting; this will au
Craig Sanders wrote:
i can't answer your question, but here's some relevant advice for you:
exim doesn't scale. if you want performance, switch to postfix.
Yeah... well... I've already moved every other machine I deal with over
to Courier. I like it because it's one-stop-shopping for all of
You don't have to be a rocket scientist to realize that the following
remote mailer messages give varying degrees of optimism regarding future
delivery:
550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
452 Mailbox full
452 Insufficient disk space; try again later
421 Too many conc
Craig Sanders wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 07:23:50PM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
Unfortunately, I haven't seen anything in Exim that lets you customize
it's retry behavior based upon this. It does offer an "error" field in
the retry section, but it's only for some
Tommy Moore wrote:
but what will I use for hosting the e-mail accounts?
Also what are my options for a web based interface to these e-mail
accounts as well as a control pannel for my users to create e-mail
addresses for their domains?
Well, Courier lets you have "true" virtual accounts. By that
Okay since I had a 3-year-old Exim configuration file, I decided to
take a brand-new one and then use "diff" to find what I needed to move over.
Hopefully now, it is rejecting bad recipients at SMTP time. However,
it's also sending me "Message frozen" messages every time it freezes
somethin
Kóczán Péter wrote:
I have a problem regarding to amavis. I've configured it for courier and the
config file is ok, however amavis does not run, when i execute amavis, it
gives the following error:
AMAVIS: Couldn't init AMAVIS::MTA::Courier: Invalid argument at
/usr/share/perl/AMAVIS.pm line 235,
Here's a wierd one.
Our SpamAssassin daemon crashed and, when I tried to restart it, I got:
Could not create INET socket: Address already in use IO::Socket::INET:
Address already in use
... and I can't find any running spamd, so it looks like it's a stuck
socket.
I haven't seen one of these
Michael Wood wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 03:34:04PM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
Is there a better way, these days? Can I forcibly "un-use" the port?
If not, can I, at the least, find out what process ID's the kernel
thinks have it open?
It will time out after a while.
Nicolas Rueff wrote:
Anyway, my question is what software do most of you use? Obviously,
we have decided to use Debian for our base os. However, what do most
of you use for:
1. Webmail
Imp. Works well. Really.
I've had a lot of headaches with Imp. Imp relies on Horde being
correctly set
Is anyone else using Apache2 with Tomcat4?
I've been trying to find an appropriate connector to use between them.
I've found references on Google to things like libapache2-mod-jk2,
libapache2-mod-webapp, or libapache2-mod-jk, but I haven't been able to
find any of them in stable or unstable...
Here's a question that has always been bugging me.
Ever since we moved from smail to exim many years ago at my isp, exim
never seems to discard messages in the input queue.
Even though the single retry rule is the stock one (which retrys for
something like 4 days), we end up with stuff that is w
Maarten Vink wrote:
Does the output of the "mailq" command provide any useful information
about these messages? My first guess would be that you're dealing with
"frozen" messages
Yup. A lot of them are frozen.
If that is the case, have a look at the "timeout_frozen_after"
setting; this will auto
Craig Sanders wrote:
i can't answer your question, but here's some relevant advice for you:
exim doesn't scale. if you want performance, switch to postfix.
Yeah... well... I've already moved every other machine I deal with over
to Courier. I like it because it's one-stop-shopping for all of my
You don't have to be a rocket scientist to realize that the following
remote mailer messages give varying degrees of optimism regarding future
delivery:
550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
452 Mailbox full
452 Insufficient disk space; try again later
421 Too many conc
Craig Sanders wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 07:23:50PM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
Unfortunately, I haven't seen anything in Exim that lets you customize
it's retry behavior based upon this. It does offer an "error" field in
the retry section, but it's only for some
Tommy Moore wrote:
but what will I use for hosting the e-mail accounts?
Also what are my options for a web based interface to these e-mail
accounts as well as a control pannel for my users to create e-mail
addresses for their domains?
Well, Courier lets you have "true" virtual accounts. By that,
Okay since I had a 3-year-old Exim configuration file, I decided to
take a brand-new one and then use "diff" to find what I needed to move over.
Hopefully now, it is rejecting bad recipients at SMTP time. However,
it's also sending me "Message frozen" messages every time it freezes
somethin
Kóczán Péter wrote:
I have a problem regarding to amavis. I've configured it for courier and the
config file is ok, however amavis does not run, when i execute amavis, it
gives the following error:
AMAVIS: Couldn't init AMAVIS::MTA::Courier: Invalid argument at
/usr/share/perl/AMAVIS.pm line 235,
Here's a wierd one.
Our SpamAssassin daemon crashed and, when I tried to restart it, I got:
Could not create INET socket: Address already in use IO::Socket::INET:
Address already in use
... and I can't find any running spamd, so it looks like it's a stuck
socket.
I haven't seen one of these fo
Michael Wood wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 03:34:04PM -0800, Joe Emenaker wrote:
Is there a better way, these days? Can I forcibly "un-use" the port?
If not, can I, at the least, find out what process ID's the kernel
thinks have it open?
It will time out after a while.
Is anyone else using Apache2 with Tomcat4?
I've been trying to find an appropriate connector to use between them.
I've found references on Google to things like libapache2-mod-jk2,
libapache2-mod-webapp, or libapache2-mod-jk, but I haven't been able to
find any of them in stable or unstable... a
23 matches
Mail list logo
