ay, I know the ext2 2Gb filelimit has been fixed in the 2.4 kernels,
so thats a bonus, but are there any other "great" improvements like that?
And don't tell me about the new USB, webcam, etc. functions and other
"desktop" stuff because these are servers ;-)
Thanks in
Hi,
Well... you could either simply get the source directly from apache's
website www.apache.org, or if you have deb-src entries in your apt.conf,
you could pull the source from there, and then simply compile suexec with
your own settings.
Its a REAL pain in the ass, but so far I haven't found a
I must say... thats pretty stupid.
I mean... okay.. you spam some newbie list, or some "get-rich-quick"
mailing lists, maybe no one would notice, or they wouldn't care... (hehe
maybe they don't know what to do and how to complain).
However... and ISP list... debian-isp? Thats got to be a REAL st
Hi,
Yes the limit is still the usual 2Gb. The limit is actually with ext2, i
believe, although I'm not sure.
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Przemyslaw Wegrzyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2001 5:58 PM
Subject: kernel 2.2.19 limitations
ues? Does
everything run as normal?
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Billson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 12:28 AM
Subject: Re: kernel 2.2.19 limitations.
> > Yes the limit
Um...
This is a question related to ISPs?
- Original Message -
From: "John Joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 5:45 AM
Subject: speed up modem connection
> I surf with Netscape 4.0 for Linux and find it much
> slower than IE 5.0 of MS Winodws. I
Hi,
I was wondering a few days ago about this... tell me if this is possible
or not.
We have servers with 2 NICs each. Right now, we usually plug in only one
of the NICs to the switch.
However, some people want to have the other NIC connected as well for
redunduncy and additional bandwidth (100
Hi,
I don't get this.
If you can run DNS servers (that require static IPs) then why on earth
would you want to run the webserver on a dynamic IP?
You then go on to talk about "resilience and redundancy" for your
webservers. On a dynamic IP? Whats up with that?
You're just contradicting yourself
Hum...
I ready the attachment, but it only says that they were served with an
injunction in NZ.
Doesn't say if they will be back up, what is happening now, or what the
future holds.
Anyone know?
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Waldner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "s u
Hi,
I work at a Web/Dedicated Server hosting company in Hong Kong.
A few companies in the USA have sent us servers for colocation in Hong
Kong for a whole number of reasons (true redunancy/backup, fast
connections to Asia, etc.), but I suppose that avoiding PSI's possible
network meltdown would
Hi all,
I was wondering if there is a way to find out what/where the bottleneck of
a large mail server is.
A client is running a huge mail server that we set up for them (running
qmail), but performance seems to be limited somewhere. Qmail has already
been optimized as far as it can go (big-todo
r countries like Australia (not sure bout US).
BTW. was your mother headmistress of St. Paul before?
Sincerely,
Jason
----- Original Message -
From: "schemerz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 3:57 PM
Subje
ram
don't come cheap last time I checked... :-/
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: Finding the Bott
Hi,
I found vmstat on the server, but could not find your other "systat" or
"fstat". I think this is exactly what I need... especially fstat.
Does anyone know a similar program for linux?
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <
PURELY for mail queue processing would help at all? Or would the
bottleneck then be shifted to NFS?
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu
k that the above hardware configuration is performing at it's
realistic limit?
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday,
Hi,
Yes that is correct. The design of qmail forces a connection for each
email message. Changing that behaviour would require massive patching.
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Tomasz Papszun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rich Puhek" <[EMAIL PROTEC
ildir can be put in a NFS disk... BUT i've never heard of anyone
putting the mail queue on NFS, so I'm not sure if the file locking issues
you mention would pertain to that as well.
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
We also use PR3000s with various WAN cards. Cyclades have wonder products
and great support. I recommend them. www.cyclades.com
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Teun Vink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nicolas Bougues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "debian li
moderately large list of domains (eg. aol), so the local DNS server
would've cache them already anyway.
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rich Puhek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jason Lim"
<[EMAI
l Message -
From: "Peter Billson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: Finding the Bottleneck
> > Additionally, as far as I can see, most emails get
ely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Brian May"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: Finding the Bottl
fted to the CPU?!)
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -----
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: Finding the Bottleneck
On Friday 08 June 2001 00:05
be preprocessed. It seems the
system's ability to preprocess the messages has declined since putting the
queue on disk 2.
I don't see any reason why... but anyway, facts are facts :-/
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We haven't run nor tested 2.4 kernels yet... but sooner or later we'll get
there. We run a business and need things to be near 100% stable (or at
least try). Do you see any other way to tweak these disks?
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECT
ifference :-/
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Rich Puhek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 7:11 AM
Subject: R
ar disk or ext2
settings that would benefit the mail queue in any way? Don't want to get
everything set up, only to find I missed something critical that you
already thought of!
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ja
just what
I've heard.
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Alson van der Meulen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 2:32 AM
Subject: Re: Finding the Bottleneck
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 02:04:36AM +0800, Jaso
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Marcin Owsiany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: Finding the Bottleneck
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 02:04:36AM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
> > I'm not exactly su
n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 4:25 AM
Subject: Re: Finding the Bottleneck
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 04:14:10AM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Actually, I thought they increased performance mainly if you w
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rich Puhek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2001 1:04 AM
Subject: Re: Finding the Bottleneck
On Saturday 09 June 2001 01:11, Rich Puhek wrote:
> Memory memory memor
June 11, 2001 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: Finding the Bottleneck
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 04:49:21PM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > AFAIK, even if there was a gig of ram in there, it would not allocate
any
> > (or maybe just a little) to free memory, and would throw an
everyone thats been following
this thread. Since he is the expert on this, he's the authority!
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAI
ition resizing proggies
(and they are pretty stable now too), we can't do that.
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: Finding the Bott
Hi,
This is also something that I've been looking into too, with no success
yet.
If you find something, let me know and I'll do the same! :-)
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Lunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:21 PM
Subje
Hi,
Something VERY interested has occurred.
I kept playing around with the /var/qmail/queue directory, to see how I
could optimize it.
I also saw in some qmail-* manpage that mess & pid directories, and todo &
intd directories have to be on the same drive (or was that partition?
nevermind)
So
K odd
messages not preprocessed yet.
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: Finding the Bottleneck
Hi all,
I was about to develop my own "Remove Rescue Disk)... but thought maybe
you had a better idea or had already done this...
Regularly if the hard disk fails or needs a manual fsck (usually just
pressing y throughout), then it means a trip to the datacenter at whatever
ungodly hour it may b
Really?
Strange... last time I looked around there (a couple of months ago) I
couldn't find what I wanted. i haven't looked there again since, but I'll
have another quick check.
AFAIK there are "rescue disks" but none that also include a telnetd and
remote connection capabilities as well. I don'
CCLinux, eh? Haven't heard of it... I'll scratch around google and
freshmeat to see if I can find it.
Sounds like it might do just what is required :-)
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Martin WHEELER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim&
Looks like it might be the one :-)
Thanks.
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Martin WHEELER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Allen Ahoffman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: S
www.toms.net has a floppy distro, plus links to tons of other floppy
distros, so even if it isn't the right one, then I'm bound to find
something there that would fit.
Thanks :-)
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Martin WHEELER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
Do they all have their own IPs within your lan? You could limit bandwidth
on a per-IP level if you want. That way, if they decide to play with
napster and stuff, they will then have to suffer with low webpage loading,
slow email, etc. That might encourage them NOT to use those types of
programs an
It would depend on how popular the sites hosted on the servers were. If
you set a the times to be too low, say 1 minute, then every time someone
looks up the DNS records, then BLAM... your dns servers are hit because
things aren't cached anywhere.
So I would use something like an hour (we use thi
I mentioned "hardware solutions" in my email...
however, the cost of these hardware appliances is pretty high. In theory,
you can do the same thing with a properly configured linux server at less
than half the price. Of course... the money is in the configuration ;-)
Sincerely,
Jason
- Orig
gt; > Subject: Re: Remote Resue Disk
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 05:02:55PM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I was about to develop my own "Remove Rescue Disk)... but thought
> > > maybe you had a better idea or
d
> with the machines, and they used to be prefering Suns...
>
> "You can take control of the system remotely over the LAN or WAN, or
> access the front-panel serial port for BIOS setup/update or text-
> based applications."
> http://channel.intel.com/business/ibp/serv
Hi,
Pretty much as title.
How can I check the "real" connection speed of a NIC? These are realtek
8129/8139 network cards. The leds behind the NIC aren't exactly
informative. I was hoping there was some way to do this directly in linux
through a hardware call. I checked /proc and i couldn't find
:100
RX bytes:2864521106 (2731.8 Mb) TX bytes:3091168733 (2947.9 Mb)
Interrupt:5 Base address:0xe800
Again, thanks.
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Bart-Jan Vrielink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
Hi,
I don't quite understand one bit of your statement...
> This way if one of the connections go down, that DNS server becomes
available
> and those IPs stop being handed out ... effectively removing those IPs
from
> your DNS rotation and automatically failing over to the remaining
> connection
Hi,
Anyone that has followed this list knows I've been trying to boost Qmail's
outgoing mail performance greatly.
Just thought I'd let everyone know that increasing the number in the
"conf-split" drastically improves performance.
One of the problems I was having earlier was that the customer's
Hi,
I was wondering if you guys know of any cost-effective KVM (remote
access/control) solution that can be accessed over the internet?
Everyone knows about the cheapo products that you have to press a button
to switch between computers and stuff, but how about being able to
accessed these over
connection ;-)
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Janssen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 4:59 AM
Subject: Re: KVM via Internet?
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 03:41
I've been optimizing a number of email servers for a client now, AND I can
tell you that ANY disk access apart from the mail system will severely
impact the speed of the server, unless you're talking real low volume. As
soon as you start to get around 200-300K per day, you're gonna need to
seperat
Okay... I wasn't thinking. The salt is stored within the crypted password
generated, which is why password crackers work.
Well... hopefully you can confirm this :-)
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi!
I was wondering where the salt is stored on a debian linux system...?
I want to cp /etc/shadow from one server to another for simplicity, and I
would rather not have to regenerate all the crypted passwords over again.
So... if I can make the salt for both servers the same then that SHOULD
w
Hi,
Thanks for the confirmation :-)
Sincerely,
Jason Lim
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Morin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 4:02 AM
Subject: Re: Salt for /etc/sha
Don't dlinks use the rtl chipset?
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Louwers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Christofer Algotsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: Ethernet Card recommendation
>
> > D-Link cant
Hi,
If you're interested in that, there is a good bit about datacenter
temperature and humidity, plus a few other environmental factors at:
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/1998-10/msg00276.html
Have a look. Makes good reading. We learnt a bit.
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
Why not bridge eth0 and eth1?
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Billson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: Roach Motel For Packets...
> Let me see if bad drawings help any:
>
> eth0(to Internet IP "A.A.A.A")--|--|
>
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone knew of a packaged jvm (java virtual machine)
and some associated libs.
Perhaps someone has packaged Sun's? Or IBM's?
Is Kaffe okay? Someone wants to run java programs (eg. java
programnamehere) and such, and we need to come up with something.
Unfortunately, due to
Hi,
I'll try those, and see howit goes. We're running unstable (yes, on a
production machine... amazing eh?), so I'll let you know how it goes.
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Swany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rikki Hall" &l
Hi Dave...
Hum... if the Highpoint chipsets are merely IDE controllers... whats the
advantage to using them over the regular plain vanilla generic IDE
controller cards?
Don't they offload ANY work from the processor at ALL? They have to have
SOME sort of benefit... otherwise, why market them as
How often will these people be checking email? ONLY through the webmail
interface, or will they be checking by pop3, imap, etc.?
If they start playing around with imap and storing large files and
attachments on your server, the requirements will vary greatly.
If you're doing a Hotmail setup (2Mb
Sanders wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 03:32:29AM +1100, Jason Lim wrote:
> > > We run unstable on our production servers. That means we must be
very
> > > vigilant in making sure no one else has had a problem. We download
> > > the updates, and install them a da
ned this
before... anyway).
Sincerely,
Jason Lim
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Hope" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: customizing debian apache
On the topic of RAID...
does anyone know if the HighPoint RAID chipsets are supported YET?
BSD has had support for this for ages... linux in the game yet?
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "James Beam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2
Hi all,
On a 2.2.19 kernel box, this happened:
21:30:12 alpha -- MARK --
21:50:11 alpha -- MARK --
22:02:05 alpha kernel: eth0: Memory squeeze, deferring packet.
22:02:05 alpha last message repeated 46 times
22:02:17 alpha netsaint: Warning: fork() in my_system() failed for command
"/usr/lib/net
Hi!
Do you'all know what this means:
"eth0: Memory squeeze, deferring packet"?
We get that one one of our boxes every so often, and it is annoying
because then it loses all connectivity to the net, and has to be
physically rebooted.
eth0: RealTek RTL8139 Fast Ethernet at 0xe800, IRQ 10, 00:50:
ginal Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 2:06 AM
Subject: Re: eth0: Memory squeeze, deferring packet
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2001 19:12, Jason Lim wrote
y are safe enough for production
use? Any huge performance increase?
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 7:35 AM
S
Hi,
sigh... yes... some of our servers have been hit with the "SSH CRC-32
compensation attack detector vulnerability" attack.
some servers have been compromised, and the usual rootkit stuff (install
root shells in /etc/inetd.conf, bogus syslogd, haxored ps, etc.).
What is an easy way to locate
e -
From: "Keith Elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: Help... SSH CRC-32 compensation attack detector vulnerability
> What is the patch to plug this hole
Uh... this is interesting...
As far as I know, bulk friendly hosting and such go for around 300-400 per
month at a minimum... with many a lot more.
So not only are you trying to scam people with pyramid schemes and such,
you're cheap too.
Oh well.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PRO
Hi all,
Do you know how to change the permissions of the log files apache
generates?
-rw-r-1 www-data www-data 1372461 Dec 7 13:04 apache-access.log
-rw-r-1 www-data www-data 740269 Dec 2 06:21
apache-access.log.0
-rw-r-1 www-data www-data44414 Nov 25 05:52
apach
om: "James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: Strange apache behaviour?
>
> It is usual to run webalizer as a user? I have never even thought of
> doing tha
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: Strange apache behaviour?
> Hello !
>
> > Do you know how to change the permissions of the log files apache
> > generates?
> >
> > -
Anyone figured out my apache problem (log file permissions)?
I still haven't figured this one out yet.
TIA,
Jas
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 1:52 AM
Subject: Re: Strange
n
/etc/apache/cron.conf or something like that...?
Sincerely,
Jas
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Billson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: Strange
c 09, 2001 at 08:05:17AM +1100, Jason Lim wrote:
> > Perhaps Johnie could make this an optional setting in
> > /etc/apache/cron.conf or something like that...?
>
> There is:
>
> .# Whether to chown logfiles to the user/group Apache runs as.
> APACHE_CHOWN_LOGFILES=0
>
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:02 AM
Subject: Re: Strange apache behaviour? (solved)
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 01:16:03PM +1100, Jason Lim wrote:
> > I know about that option...
> > but it doesn't CHMOD... it only chowns.
Let me confirm to you that AMD Durons from 700-1.1G work perfectly with
Kernel 2.2.19 and 2.4.16.
We have over 10 such boxes running 2.4.16 and they are all rock solid.
Faster than the PIII and P4 boxes.
So whatever is going down, it is your motherboard, heatsink, something.
Just a reminder... D
Did you get it working? I never could.
Always spits the dummy. I already filed a bug with it.
But if you got it working, let me know. I mean out of the package... not
recompiling it yourself.
TIA
Sincerely,
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Hi,
Does anyone know of a good MicroATX motherboard that supports 1.5-2GB of
RAM?
MicroATX motherboards make nice servers (small form factor, and support
nearly everything conventional ATX motherboards have), but they SEEM to
usually only have 2 DIMM slots (512Mx2=1024M max).
Have you over come
Hi,
Anyone found a MB like this?
TIA.
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:42 AM
Subject: MicroATX Motherboard with 1.5-2GB Ram?
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know of a
I've confirmed that mod_throttle fails to work with 1.3.19 all the way to
1.3.22 (nearly the latest?).
Anyone EVER get this working, or am I the ONLY person around that actually
uses mod_throttle (or would LIKE to ;-) ).
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Lim" <[EM
ufacturers only put on 2 slots, so you have 512M * 2 only.
Anyone find anything?
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Nicolas Bouthors" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:28 PM
Subject:
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Aitchison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 7:40 AM
Subject: Re: MicroATX Motherboard with 1.5-2GB Ram?
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 06
Well, we've had RTL8139 cards in servers up for about 60-70 days with no
problem. Don't know about the outgoing/ping issue as the servers are
always in use, but they appear reliable.
Sincerely,
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "John Gonzalez, Tularosa Communications" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi all,
What do you think would be the best way to duplicate a HD to another
(similar sized) HD?
I'm thinking that a live RAID solution isn't the best option, as (for
example) if crackers got in and fiddled with the system, all the HDs would
end up having the same fiddled files.
If the HD is du
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2002 07:28, Jason Lim wrote:
> > What do you think would be the best way to duplicate a HD to another
> > (similar sized) HD?
> >
> > I'm thinking that a live RAID solution isn't the best option, as (for
> > example) if crackers got
> > For example, http://www.arcoide.com/ . To quote the function we're
looking
> > at " the DupliDisk2 automatically switches to the remaining drive and
> > alerts the user that a drive has failed. Then, depending on the model,
the
> > user can hot-swap out the failed drive and re-mirror in the
ba
> > I know of a few hardware solutions that do something like this, but
would
> > like to do this in hardware. They claim to perform a "mirror" of one
HD to
> > another HD while the system is live and in use.
>
> It's called RAID-1.
I dunno... whenever I think of "RAID" I always think of live mir
> > Except that I've pointed out already that we're specifically NOT
looking
> > at a live RAID solution. This is a backup drive that is suppose to be
> > synced every 12 hours or 24 hours.
> >
> > The idea being that if there is a virus, a cracker, or hardware
> > malfunction
>
> And if you disco
> > Except that I've pointed out already that we're specifically NOT
looking
> > at a live RAID solution. This is a backup drive that is suppose to be
> > synced every 12 hours or 24 hours.
>
> Sorry, but I don't see any benefit to having maximum 12 hour old data
when
> you could have 0. The hardw
> > You might say "tape backup"... but keep in mind that it doesn't offer
a
> > "plug n play" solution if a server goes down. With the above method, a
> > dead server could be brought to life in a minute or so (literally)
> > rather
> > than half an hour... an hour... or more.
>
> It occours to me
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 00:44, Jason Lim wrote:
> > > > The idea being that if there is a virus, a cracker, or hardware
> > > > malfunction
> > >
> > > And if you discover this within 12 hours... Most times you won't.
> >
> > We'
While I've never run things from
/home/*/public_html/cgi-bin/somethinghere.cgi,
we've always had to recompile suexec to get things working.
suexec has hard-compiled in the allowed directory, so you'd need to
recompile that to get some other directory to work.
I suggest you try that.
Sincerely,
I would also strongly suggest getting chkrootkit.
chkrootkit - Checks for signs of rootkits on the local system
chkrootkit identifies whether the target computer is infected with a
rootkit. It can currently identify the following root kits:
1. lrk3, lrk4, lrk5, lrk6 (and some variants);
2. Sol
> > Is it really necessary to buy new hard drives? Is there a reason why
> > he can't just reformat his current drives before reinstalling?
>
> Sure he can, if he wants to lose the evidence of what happened and lose
the
> possibility to hand the drives over to law enforcement officials (which
may
1 - 100 of 639 matches
Mail list logo
