Hi all,
I ran apt-get update; apt-get upgrade on my mailserver today and
have now the following problem:
Whenever I try to send an email from my local pine client I get
[Mail not sent. Sending error: 451 Error: queue file write error]
Anybody knows why that would be?
I ran
postfix check
with n
> Allen Ahoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is there a distribution that will cheaply replace a load balancer?
> > e.g.
> > for web servers.
> > LVS, ...?
I'm also currently evaluating load balancers with linux and am running a
Piranha (ha.redhat.com) system very successfully at present.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:34:45 +0100 (MET)
From: DI Peter Burgstaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Marcel Hicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: load balancer
> > :)) And what about sessions ?
>
> As session data is usually stored i
I had the same problem when we switched from one ISP ot the other I was running
both for a couple of months.
Turned out that, as Jeremy Lunn suggested, that my new ISP wouldn't allow
IPs from a different Net be routed through his net, which is of course very
sensible and right. However, in my case
Hi there,
> > Most (of our) engineers are not linux-compliant.
> > Need centralized login, (can't use NIS+, we've already got a NIS+ system
> > for Solaris... don't wanna confuse the issue,)
>
> You might like to look into using LDAP for this. Another alternitive is
> using an SQL database. Thi
Hi all,
I ran apt-get update; apt-get upgrade on my mailserver today and
have now the following problem:
Whenever I try to send an email from my local pine client I get
[Mail not sent. Sending error: 451 Error: queue file write error]
Anybody knows why that would be?
I ran
postfix check
with no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, June 11, 2003, at 03:21 PM, Theodore Knab wrote:
I have 3 dual processor IBM Netfinity Servers with the XEON P3 (1Mb
Cache).
The machine type is IBM Type 8665-6RY.
I recently updated from the 2.4.19 to the 2.4.20 kernel using Debian
Sa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again,
How long have those machines been online?
$ uptime
11:14:51 up 8 days, 21:46, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00
$ uname -a
Linux data 2.4.21-rc6 #1 SMP Tue Jun 3 12:46:45 CEST 2003 i686 unknown
There is a discussion about the 2.4.21r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just to have a little more to choose from,
I've also used the CERC controllers which Dell puts into their servers
successfully.
Performance and debian support is good but I haven't had to recover a
failed drive yet.
- - Just my 2 cents.
- - Cheers,
Hi there,
one way that comes to mind is to run incoming mail for this account
through a
filter of some sort (mailfilter, procmail etc.) that would check for
the sender
address.
This, of course, would also let spam emails through that "pose" as
local senders but are, in fact, fake.
Just my 2 c
Maybe I'm not getting this thread but why don't you use
WebDAV over HTTPS?
It seems to be supported in all the tools you mentioned.
- Just my 2 cents.
- Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
we're using a similar setup for some hosts and I have the best results
so far with dump/restore on ext2/ext3 partitions.
I've even successfully recreated a database server with mysql and
postgresql servers running
and using dump as a backup tool.
No problems so far.
- Cheers, Peter
--
On Wednesday, October 1, 2003, at 3:43 PM, Roman Medina wrote:
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 11:42:25 -, you wrote:
which is the backup target media?
Hard-disk. The idea is to have another logical partition for backups
and then some scripts to upload/download to any secure site (I could
use rsync over
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cool, I know the answer to that one.
You can use DMO (http://sourceforge.net/projects/dmo)
The sourceforge link is the frontend to the database. Its still lacking
some scripts
but in general, it uses nmap, nessus etc. to discover as much as
possible f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Or have a look at jfnnms (jffnms.sourceforge.net)
- - Cheers, Peter
- --
Dipl.-Ing. Peter Burgstaller
Technical Director
@ all information network & services gmbh
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: +43 662 452335
fax : +43 662 452335 90
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, June 11, 2003, at 03:21 PM, Theodore Knab wrote:
I have 3 dual processor IBM Netfinity Servers with the XEON P3 (1Mb
Cache).
The machine type is IBM Type 8665-6RY.
I recently updated from the 2.4.19 to the 2.4.20 kernel using Debian
Sarg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again,
How long have those machines been online?
$ uptime
11:14:51 up 8 days, 21:46, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.00
$ uname -a
Linux data 2.4.21-rc6 #1 SMP Tue Jun 3 12:46:45 CEST 2003 i686 unknown
There is a discussion about the 2.4.21rc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just to have a little more to choose from,
I've also used the CERC controllers which Dell puts into their servers
successfully.
Performance and debian support is good but I haven't had to recover a
failed drive yet.
- - Just my 2 cents.
- - Cheers,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cool, I know the answer to that one.
You can use DMO (http://sourceforge.net/projects/dmo)
The sourceforge link is the frontend to the database. Its still lacking
some scripts
but in general, it uses nmap, nessus etc. to discover as much as
possible f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Or have a look at jfnnms (jffnms.sourceforge.net)
- - Cheers, Peter
- --
Dipl.-Ing. Peter Burgstaller
Technical Director
@ all information network & services gmbh
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: +43 662 452335
fax : +43 662 452335 90
> Allen Ahoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Is there a distribution that will cheaply replace a load balancer?
> > e.g.
> > for web servers.
> > LVS, ...?
I'm also currently evaluating load balancers with linux and am running a
Piranha (ha.redhat.com) system very successfully at present
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:34:45 +0100 (MET)
From: DI Peter Burgstaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Marcel Hicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: load balancer
> > :)) And what about sessions ?
>
> As session data is usually stor
I had the same problem when we switched from one ISP ot the other I was running
both for a couple of months.
Turned out that, as Jeremy Lunn suggested, that my new ISP wouldn't allow
IPs from a different Net be routed through his net, which is of course very
sensible and right. However, in my cas
Hi there,
> > Most (of our) engineers are not linux-compliant.
> > Need centralized login, (can't use NIS+, we've already got a NIS+ system
> > for Solaris... don't wanna confuse the issue,)
>
> You might like to look into using LDAP for this. Another alternitive is
> using an SQL database. Th
24 matches
Mail list logo
