Hi Danilo,
What are your servers doing? do they REALLY need that type of uptime?
Do you want loadbalancing, or failover?
Do you have one Internet provider or two?
If two, this will start getting more complicated. You will need to look
into using BGP. As you are asking this question, I assume tha
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 04:47:47PM +0100, Volker Tanger wrote:
> For incoming the firewalls simply use DNS Round-Robin on the FW members
> which have to be listed as primary/master servers for the domain in
> question. This way you are independent on network mechanics.
>
Hi Volker,
If you use rou
Hi all!
Is anyone using the courier-mta package?
Can I use it as a replacement for postfix, or am I better off sticking
to postfix?
Thanks
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 10:13:24PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Andrew Miehs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.23.2147 +0100]:
> > Can I use it as a replacement for postfix, or am I better off sticking
> > to postfix?
>
> why would you want to replace postfix?
> There is a cyrus (and postfix) backport from sid to woody:
>
> deb http://people.debian.org/~hmh/woody/ hmh/cyrus/
> deb http://people.debian.org/~hmh/woody/ hmh/postfix/
> deb http://people.debian.org/~hmh/woody/ hmh/misc/
Have had a look at this, but cyrus supports sasl2 and postfix sasl1.
:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 06:53:25PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Andrew Miehs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.24.1626 +0100]:
> > Have had a look at this, but cyrus supports sasl2 and postfix sasl1.
>
> so backport postfix from testing.
>
Hi Martin!
The reaso
Hi Danilo,
What are your servers doing? do they REALLY need that type of uptime?
Do you want loadbalancing, or failover?
Do you have one Internet provider or two?
If two, this will start getting more complicated. You will need to look
into using BGP. As you are asking this question, I assume tha
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 04:47:47PM +0100, Volker Tanger wrote:
> For incoming the firewalls simply use DNS Round-Robin on the FW members
> which have to be listed as primary/master servers for the domain in
> question. This way you are independent on network mechanics.
>
Hi Volker,
If you use rou
Hi all!
Is anyone using the courier-mta package?
Can I use it as a replacement for postfix, or am I better off sticking
to postfix?
Thanks
Andrew
On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 10:13:24PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Andrew Miehs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.23.2147 +0100]:
> > Can I use it as a replacement for postfix, or am I better off sticking
> > to postfix?
>
> why would you want to replace postfix?
> There is a cyrus (and postfix) backport from sid to woody:
>
> deb http://people.debian.org/~hmh/woody/ hmh/cyrus/
> deb http://people.debian.org/~hmh/woody/ hmh/postfix/
> deb http://people.debian.org/~hmh/woody/ hmh/misc/
Have had a look at this, but cyrus supports sasl2 and postfix sasl1.
:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 06:53:25PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Andrew Miehs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.24.1626 +0100]:
> > Have had a look at this, but cyrus supports sasl2 and postfix sasl1.
>
> so backport postfix from testing.
>
Hi Martin!
The reaso
Hi all,
Does anyone have the postfix-tls package with SMTP AUTH from woody working
together with PAM?
ie:
/etc/postfix/sasl/smtpd.conf
pwcheck_method: PAM
I have gotten it working with sasldb, but can't get it to work with PAM.
Do you need to set the smtpd_sasl_local_domain?
I have ensured th
Dear Mr Oldham,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 02:33:31PM -0700, C. R. Oldham wrote:
> > Does anyone have the postfix-tls package with SMTP AUTH from
> > woody working together with PAM?
> /etc/postfix/master.cf. A '-' is not sufficient to make sure it's not
> chrooted. Also make sure you have a file
Hi all,
Does anyone have the postfix-tls package with SMTP AUTH from woody working
together with PAM?
ie:
/etc/postfix/sasl/smtpd.conf
pwcheck_method: PAM
I have gotten it working with sasldb, but can't get it to work with PAM.
Do you need to set the smtpd_sasl_local_domain?
I have ensured th
Dear Mr Oldham,
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 02:33:31PM -0700, C. R. Oldham wrote:
> > Does anyone have the postfix-tls package with SMTP AUTH from
> > woody working together with PAM?
> /etc/postfix/master.cf. A '-' is not sufficient to make sure it's not
> chrooted. Also make sure you have a file
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 05:11:46PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> Are those partition numbers in order of location on disk?
>
> Most hard drives have the low cylinder numbers on the outside of the disk
> (which has slightly lower average seek times and much better bulk transfer
> rates). You gen
Hi all,
does anyone have any experience with large IDE disks on Debian?
I was interested in buy a couple of Western Digital 250GB Disks for
backup purposes...
And secondly, does Serial ATA work properly in Woody? or do I need a
new Kernel?
Thanks
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Hi all,
then what should I use if you don't recommend promise?
Thanx
Andrew
On Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003, at 13:20 Europe/Berlin, Thomas Kirk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:02:21PM +1000, Brad Lay wrote:
I'd stay well clear of promise if you want it to work under Debian.
I would like to suppor
I dont actually need any raid functionality
so should I go for the promise? or the 3ware cards?
Andrew
On Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003, at 14:42 Europe/Berlin, Diederik de Vries wrote:
Op di 24-06-2003, om 14:20 schreef Andrew Miehs:
If you could, 3ware. Otherwise use FreeBSD with Promise :)
Hi all!
I need to compile a 2.4.21 Kernel for Woody.
Which version of GCC should I use...
GCC3 or GCC2.95?
Should I download standard kernel src - or should I get
it from testing, or unstable?
Thanks for your help
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Normally when you buy expensive hardware the saleman should come to
you. :-)
Had a quick look in google for IOs and it seems that it is also refered
to as IOPs
Input Output Per second... And seems to refer to the controller, and
not the disks.
And after my quick look, the where talking about c
Not very scientific, but a cheap trick that may work is
force the interface on your switch to full duplex, and your PC connected
to that interface to half duplex...
May be enough to simulate what you are after...
Cheers
Andrew
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 11:54, Stefan Neufeind wrote:
Hi,
this is not
I have an 8 port 8506-8 (no raid) and 3 250GB Disks running fine on a
debian bf24 box.
Have formated each disk with ext3 and 1 partition.
Have a RAID 5 setup running on SUSE 9 with 600GB Space, and also no
problems.
Andrew
I'm installing a new system (P4C, intel mainboard, 1G RAM, 4x160GB
SAT
On Dec 13, 2003, at 00:27, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
so I'm still hoping it's a driver-version issue, but that would be
strange considering Andrew Miehs's post, although he mentions he does
not use a raid-setup (why use an 8506-8(!) and not do raid?), maybe
that
is important.
I decided on the 3ware
And a few more details - My working setup
SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
3ware Storage Controller device driver for Linux v1.02.00.036.
3w-: PCI Parity Error: clearing.
scsi0 : Found a 3ware Storage Controller at 0xe400, IRQ: 16, P-chip: 1.3
scsi0 : 3ware Storage Controller
blk: queue f7
Hi all,
I am looking at getting a new tape drive...
Has anyone had any experience with the AIT or Ultrium drives?
I am a bit worried about the 'helical scan' aspect of the AITs.
Any comments?
Thanks in advance
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
You are better off sticking to flatfiles, perl and RRD. Excel wont be able
to deal with the amount of data that netflow generates, and a database is
just a VERY expensive way of doing it (Data grows to at least 4 times the
size)...
Maybe you are agregating a lot more than we did...
Cheers
Andrew
Hi all!
I have a 3ware SATA Raid controller configured with 5 disks in RAID5.
I am trying to store millions of pictures on these disks, and am trying to
find out how best to configure everything...
So far
/etc/sysctl.conf
vm.max-readahead=512
vm.min-readahead=512
vm.bdflush=10 500 0 0 500 3000 1
Hi Michelle,
You should be able to use the G.703 interface on the 3Com NETBuilder,
but you need to find out if it supports the signaling that Morocan Telecom
provide
The other modules, like Kentrox usually have X.21 on the rear, so you
would need to have a router with an X.21 Interface...
Does
> I like to have OpenView under Linux ;-)
Why? What functionality do you need in OpenView that you don't have in
other freeware products. Openview is only expensive... and IF you can
affore openview, you can definitely afford a cheap Sun box to run it on.
>>Opensoure:
>>MRTG for traffic stats
>
> Am 2004-04-15 11:26:23, schrieb Andrew Miehs:
>>
>>> I like to have OpenView under Linux ;-)
> Maybe it has its price, but it the right thing to control several
>
> 1) Backbones from 311, 622 and GBit
> 2) 3-5 BGP-4 Routers
> 3) around 150 RadioRidges
&
What sort of interface cards are you running on the cisco? What type of
lines are they? I take it they are structured, otherwise verizon
wouldn't be mentioning the encoding problem. Are both routers under
your control?
This could be that case but i doubt it. I would imagine that the
problem is
I suggest you all read
http://www.porcupine.org/postfix-mirror/newdoc/NFS_README.html
Especially the sentence
'Thus, Postfix on NFS is slightly less reliable than Postfix on a local
disk.'
Either something is reliable or not. there is no such thing as slightly
less reliable.
Especially when i
Hi Markus
On 18.04.2004, at 12:30, Markus Oswald wrote:
I suggest you read it first...
Quote from NFS_README.html:
---
# In order to have mailbox locking over NFS you have to configure
# everything to use fcntl() locks for mailbox access (or switch to
# maildir style, whic
The proper solution would be to turn off the DF bit...
But I unfortunately have not been able to find it yet...
Regards
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I have recently discovered that my PXE install scripts are destroying my
ext3 file systems, due to me not unmounting the drive before rebooting.
The second part of my install chroots into /target and runs apt-get
dselect-upgrade. Unfortunately, I can not umount the new root disk
'/target'
Hi Jan-Benedict
> [ If you start with a new topic, please start with a fresh email. DON'T
> take some random old mail and delete it's subject - you'll break
> proper threading! Thanks. ]
oops... sorry...
>
> Prior chroot'ing to /target:
>
> # mv /target/sbin/start-stop-daemon /target/sbin/start
Dear list,
I am confused... I am running two debian boxes with woody,
but one has a ulimit -u (max user proc) of 7168, and the other of 256.
(both as root) the difference does not appear to be in login.defs or
/etc/security/limits.
Does anyone have any ideas where I should look...
diff -r /et
/etc/sysctl.conf is empty on both boxes...
Both are running woody.
Very confused...
Andrew
On 18.05.2004, at 10:40, Philipp Steinkrüger wrote:
use sysctl. i think there is also a config file
/etc/sysctl.conf.
regards,
philipp
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Miehs" <[EMAIL P
Hi Philipp,
I agree with you that the boxes may need tuning, but thats not the
point
develop:~$ ulimit -u
7168
develop:~$
www01:~# ulimit -u
256
www01:~#
On both boxes
/etc/sysctl.conf are empty
www01:~# diff login.defs.develop /etc/login.defs
www01:~#
www01:~# diff limits.conf.develop /etc/s
using the same kernel on both boxes? 2.4.x gives the 7168
> limit, 2.6.x gives "unlimited" and 2.2.x gives 256 by default.
>
>
> Andrew Miehs wrote:
>> Hi Philipp,
>>
>> I agree with you that the boxes may need tuning, but thats not the
>> poi
The box with 7168 is installed from a NetInstall Debian CD.
The box with 256 is installed via PXE Boot using a copied filesystem from
a box installed with the SAME NetInstall Debian CD.
Both boxes are initially installed with WOODY, using the bf24 kernel.
Regards
Andrew
> Andrew: Did you upgrad
Hi all,
ok I am starting to get a bit further -
If I log in on the console, I get a max processes of 7168
If I log in via telnet (installed for the test) I get 7168
If I have a cronjob that 'ulimit -a >> /tmp/ulimit' I get 7168
If I edit /etc/init.d/rc and add a 'ulimit -a > /ulimit.txt' I get 7168
Help!
I can't find it How do I turn off the 'Don't Fragment' bit? without
using IP Tables/ Chains? Is there a proc setting? or do I need to
re-compile ther Kernel? and if so, where is the jumper?
Thanks
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
?
Regards
Andrew
> On June 21, 2004 07:36 am, Andrew Miehs wrote:
>
>> I can't find it How do I turn off the 'Don't Fragment' bit?
>> without using IP Tables/ Chains? Is there a proc setting? or do I need
>> to re-compile ther Kernel? and if so, wher
Will have to try it again...
The reason why Path MTU doesn't work, is that our F5s (BigIPs) seem to
have a broken implementation of NATing ICMP PMTU packets (at least when
using Aggregate ALL - OncConnect or SNAT)
Andrew
> My bet would be that someone is blocking icmp messages (you, your
> firew
Stripping the DF Bit should be enough to solve this problem... as the
routers will then fragment the packets as required.
Or have I missed something?
Andrew
On 22.06.2004, at 09:54, Jean-Francois Dive wrote:
Just to mention but when you have pmtu occuring in a vpn context, you
have a problem if t
Doesn't seem like a very scaleable solution... Can't wait for IPv6! :-)
I am just too lazy to keep this type of list up-to date...
Found an Interesting link while 'surfing'
http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=97
And has anyone got any opinions on
http://www.space.net/~maex/Drafts/dns-mtamark/
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 08:32:17AM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal'
von Bidder wrote:
Well, if a host blocks mail from me, mail from that host is in fact
unanswerable mail. It is just a subset of mail which can't be answered.
I think the important part here is not the host, but the domain. If th
Hi all,
What SCSI controller is recommended nowardays for connecting an external
U160 SCSI storage system? NCR? Adaptec? Speed is good, STABILITY is most
important however - one will be for a postgres database the other for a
mail server.
Thanks for your help,
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi Michelle,
I have an external RAID system, and as such do not need a RAID
controller...
Would you still use the ICP vortex to connect 1 disk?
Andrew
On 28.06.2004, at 18:01, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2004-06-28 16:12:19, schrieb Andrew Miehs:
Hi all,
What SCSI controller is recommended
You may want to have a look at this
http://www.postfix.org/transport.5.html
Andrew
On 05.07.2004, at 23:06, Gustavo wrote:
Anyone use transport with postfix? I need to receive de msg in server
A and
transmit it to server B or C, according the username.. I it possible?
thaks,
Gustavo from Brazil
/security/limits.conf
This problem is fixed in Sarge! Yipee! I hope it wont be too long now till
sarge goes stable
Thanks for all your help,
Regards
Andrew
On Tuesday 18 May 2004 01:06, Andrew Miehs wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I am confused... I am running two debian boxes with woody,
>
Hi all,
Ummm... Bit confused here, but RAID 1 is not faster, than a single disk.
RAID one is just for 'safety' purposes. Yes, you do have 2 disks, but
in an
ideal world, they will both be synced with one another, and both be
doing
exactly the same thing at the same time.
If you want speed, use R
Hi all,
Its a little off topic, but am looking at setting up a wiki
The two that come to mind are jspWiki, and Twiki.
Has anyone had BAD experiences with either of these two? or should I be using
something completely different... (Am NOT a PHP fan.)
Regards
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Friday 08 October 2004 22:07, Andrew P. Kaplan wrote:
> I am trying to upgrade postfix using apt-get install put it only has
> version 1.1.1 when I went to the debian the latest package is also 1.1.1
> How do I get a later package.
Hello Andrew,
http://www.backports.org/
word of warning - d
Hi Martin,
I am a little confused with your requirements -
On the one hand, you are happy to install via nfs, but on the other hand,
you want monitoring done via 'ssh'?
If you really need this much security, you should probably look at
implementing ALL your connections via IPSEC - and possibly
On Sunday 31 October 2004 14:17, martin f krafft wrote:
> > This way you could possibly reduce your internal secuity
> > requirements, and not need encryption everywhere. Just make sure
> > you back up your data regularily
>
> The problem is people plugging laptops in on the cluster side.
>
If peo
Sorry Mike,
You are correct - I should have said 'I use nagios for SNMP'...
I have too many other boxes that don't speak 'ssh' and as such, try and
use one method for all of them. In my environment, I do not pass any
data (health data) which needs encryption, so SNMP is perfect for my
requiremen
He can look at the problem later, at the moment
It seems that his name server isn't working correctly...
If he wants other people to see his reverse entries, he will
have to go talk to his provider
Andrew
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:53:16 +0100
andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shouldnt this just be
zo
Hi all,
Has anyone managed to get L2TP, IPSec, racoon, running in a road
warrior setup with XP using pre-shared keys. (Or can I not used
pre-shared keys for roadwarriro setups)
Sample files would be really helpfully, especially
/etc/racoon/racoon.conf
/etc/l2tpd/l2tpd.conf
psk.txt, and chap-se
I have now managed to get the whole thing working with x509 keys...
This all works if I use two public IP addresses.
If my client however, is behind a NATing gateway, the whole thing falls
over.
I am running XP sp 2 and have enabled
AssumeUDPEncapsulationContextOnSendRule.
I have also added the
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 05:11:46PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> Are those partition numbers in order of location on disk?
>
> Most hard drives have the low cylinder numbers on the outside of the disk
> (which has slightly lower average seek times and much better bulk transfer
> rates). You gen
Hi all,
does anyone have any experience with large IDE disks on Debian?
I was interested in buy a couple of Western Digital 250GB Disks for
backup purposes...
And secondly, does Serial ATA work properly in Woody? or do I need a
new Kernel?
Thanks
Andrew
Hi all,
then what should I use if you don't recommend promise?
Thanx
Andrew
On Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003, at 13:20 Europe/Berlin, Thomas Kirk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 07:02:21PM +1000, Brad Lay wrote:
I'd stay well clear of promise if you want it to work under Debian.
I would like to support that
I dont actually need any raid functionality
so should I go for the promise? or the 3ware cards?
Andrew
On Tuesday, Jun 24, 2003, at 14:42 Europe/Berlin, Diederik de Vries wrote:
Op di 24-06-2003, om 14:20 schreef Andrew Miehs:
If you could, 3ware. Otherwise use FreeBSD with Promise :)
Hi all!
I need to compile a 2.4.21 Kernel for Woody.
Which version of GCC should I use...
GCC3 or GCC2.95?
Should I download standard kernel src - or should I get
it from testing, or unstable?
Thanks for your help
Andrew
I have an 8 port 8506-8 (no raid) and 3 250GB Disks running fine on a
debian bf24 box.
Have formated each disk with ext3 and 1 partition.
Have a RAID 5 setup running on SUSE 9 with 600GB Space, and also no
problems.
Andrew
I'm installing a new system (P4C, intel mainboard, 1G RAM, 4x160GB
SATA
On Dec 13, 2003, at 00:27, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
so I'm still hoping it's a driver-version issue, but that would be
strange considering Andrew Miehs's post, although he mentions he does
not use a raid-setup (why use an 8506-8(!) and not do raid?), maybe
that
is important.
I decided on the 3ware
And a few more details - My working setup
SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00
3ware Storage Controller device driver for Linux v1.02.00.036.
3w-: PCI Parity Error: clearing.
scsi0 : Found a 3ware Storage Controller at 0xe400, IRQ: 16, P-chip: 1.3
scsi0 : 3ware Storage Controller
blk: queue f7e
Hi all,
I am looking at getting a new tape drive...
Has anyone had any experience with the AIT or Ultrium drives?
I am a bit worried about the 'helical scan' aspect of the AITs.
Any comments?
Thanks in advance
Andrew
You are better off sticking to flatfiles, perl and RRD. Excel wont be able
to deal with the amount of data that netflow generates, and a database is
just a VERY expensive way of doing it (Data grows to at least 4 times the
size)...
Maybe you are agregating a lot more than we did...
Cheers
Andrew
Hi all!
I have a 3ware SATA Raid controller configured with 5 disks in RAID5.
I am trying to store millions of pictures on these disks, and am trying to
find out how best to configure everything...
So far
/etc/sysctl.conf
vm.max-readahead=512
vm.min-readahead=512
vm.bdflush=10 500 0 0 500 3000 1
Hi Michelle,
You should be able to use the G.703 interface on the 3Com NETBuilder,
but you need to find out if it supports the signaling that Morocan Telecom
provide
The other modules, like Kentrox usually have X.21 on the rear, so you
would need to have a router with an X.21 Interface...
Does
> I like to have OpenView under Linux ;-)
Why? What functionality do you need in OpenView that you don't have in
other freeware products. Openview is only expensive... and IF you can
affore openview, you can definitely afford a cheap Sun box to run it on.
>>Opensoure:
>>MRTG for traffic stats
>
> Am 2004-04-15 11:26:23, schrieb Andrew Miehs:
>>
>>> I like to have OpenView under Linux ;-)
> Maybe it has its price, but it the right thing to control several
>
> 1) Backbones from 311, 622 and GBit
> 2) 3-5 BGP-4 Routers
> 3) around 150 RadioRidges
&
What sort of interface cards are you running on the cisco? What type of
lines are they? I take it they are structured, otherwise verizon
wouldn't be mentioning the encoding problem. Are both routers under
your control?
This could be that case but i doubt it. I would imagine that the
problem is
I suggest you all read
http://www.porcupine.org/postfix-mirror/newdoc/NFS_README.html
Especially the sentence
'Thus, Postfix on NFS is slightly less reliable than Postfix on a local
disk.'
Either something is reliable or not. there is no such thing as slightly
less reliable.
Especially when it
Hi Markus
On 18.04.2004, at 12:30, Markus Oswald wrote:
I suggest you read it first...
Quote from NFS_README.html:
---
# In order to have mailbox locking over NFS you have to configure
# everything to use fcntl() locks for mailbox access (or switch to
# maildir style, which
Hi all,
I have recently discovered that my PXE install scripts are destroying my
ext3 file systems, due to me not unmounting the drive before rebooting.
The second part of my install chroots into /target and runs apt-get
dselect-upgrade. Unfortunately, I can not umount the new root disk
'/target'
Hi Jan-Benedict
> [ If you start with a new topic, please start with a fresh email. DON'T
> take some random old mail and delete it's subject - you'll break
> proper threading! Thanks. ]
oops... sorry...
>
> Prior chroot'ing to /target:
>
> # mv /target/sbin/start-stop-daemon /target/sbin/start
The proper solution would be to turn off the DF bit...
But I unfortunately have not been able to find it yet...
Regards
Andrew
Dear list,
I am confused... I am running two debian boxes with woody,
but one has a ulimit -u (max user proc) of 7168, and the other of 256.
(both as root) the difference does not appear to be in login.defs or
/etc/security/limits.
Does anyone have any ideas where I should look...
diff -r /et
/etc/sysctl.conf is empty on both boxes...
Both are running woody.
Very confused...
Andrew
On 18.05.2004, at 10:40, Philipp Steinkrüger wrote:
use sysctl. i think there is also a config file
/etc/sysctl.conf.
regards,
philipp
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Miehs" <[EMAIL P
Hi Philipp,
I agree with you that the boxes may need tuning, but thats not the
point
develop:~$ ulimit -u
7168
develop:~$
www01:~# ulimit -u
256
www01:~#
On both boxes
/etc/sysctl.conf are empty
www01:~# diff login.defs.develop /etc/login.defs
www01:~#
www01:~# diff limits.conf.develop /etc/s
using the same kernel on both boxes? 2.4.x gives the 7168
> limit, 2.6.x gives "unlimited" and 2.2.x gives 256 by default.
>
>
> Andrew Miehs wrote:
>> Hi Philipp,
>>
>> I agree with you that the boxes may need tuning, but thats not the
>> poi
The box with 7168 is installed from a NetInstall Debian CD.
The box with 256 is installed via PXE Boot using a copied filesystem from
a box installed with the SAME NetInstall Debian CD.
Both boxes are initially installed with WOODY, using the bf24 kernel.
Regards
Andrew
> Andrew: Did you upgrad
Hi all,
ok I am starting to get a bit further -
If I log in on the console, I get a max processes of 7168
If I log in via telnet (installed for the test) I get 7168
If I have a cronjob that 'ulimit -a >> /tmp/ulimit' I get 7168
If I edit /etc/init.d/rc and add a 'ulimit -a > /ulimit.txt' I get 7168
Help!
I can't find it How do I turn off the 'Don't Fragment' bit? without
using IP Tables/ Chains? Is there a proc setting? or do I need to
re-compile ther Kernel? and if so, where is the jumper?
Thanks
Andrew
?
Regards
Andrew
> On June 21, 2004 07:36 am, Andrew Miehs wrote:
>
>> I can't find it How do I turn off the 'Don't Fragment' bit?
>> without using IP Tables/ Chains? Is there a proc setting? or do I need
>> to re-compile ther Kernel? and if so, wher
Will have to try it again...
The reason why Path MTU doesn't work, is that our F5s (BigIPs) seem to
have a broken implementation of NATing ICMP PMTU packets (at least when
using Aggregate ALL - OncConnect or SNAT)
Andrew
> My bet would be that someone is blocking icmp messages (you, your
> firew
Stripping the DF Bit should be enough to solve this problem... as the
routers will then fragment the packets as required.
Or have I missed something?
Andrew
On 22.06.2004, at 09:54, Jean-Francois Dive wrote:
Just to mention but when you have pmtu occuring in a vpn context, you
have a problem if t
Doesn't seem like a very scaleable solution... Can't wait for IPv6! :-)
I am just too lazy to keep this type of list up-to date...
Found an Interesting link while 'surfing'
http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=97
And has anyone got any opinions on
http://www.space.net/~maex/Drafts/dns-mtamark/
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 08:32:17AM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal'
von Bidder wrote:
Well, if a host blocks mail from me, mail from that host is in fact
unanswerable mail. It is just a subset of mail which can't be answered.
I think the important part here is not the host, but the domain. If th
Hi all,
What SCSI controller is recommended nowardays for connecting an external
U160 SCSI storage system? NCR? Adaptec? Speed is good, STABILITY is most
important however - one will be for a postgres database the other for a
mail server.
Thanks for your help,
Andrew
Hi Michelle,
I have an external RAID system, and as such do not need a RAID
controller...
Would you still use the ICP vortex to connect 1 disk?
Andrew
On 28.06.2004, at 18:01, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2004-06-28 16:12:19, schrieb Andrew Miehs:
Hi all,
What SCSI controller is recommended
You may want to have a look at this
http://www.postfix.org/transport.5.html
Andrew
On 05.07.2004, at 23:06, Gustavo wrote:
Anyone use transport with postfix? I need to receive de msg in server
A and
transmit it to server B or C, according the username.. I it possible?
thaks,
Gustavo from Brazil
98 matches
Mail list logo
