Re: phpBB vulnerability exploited

2005-01-12 Thread Wacquiez Sébastien
Fraser Campbell wrote: On Sunday 12 December 2004 17:46, Marek Podmaka wrote: I don't want to give hints on how to exploit this, but the attacker did wget the .tgz file, unpacked it in /tmp and run the program. So update all your phpBB installations ASAP (and of course all installations of your

UNSUBSCRIBE

2005-01-12 Thread Paweł

IMAP Servers

2005-01-12 Thread W. Andrew Loe III
I'm currently using Courier-IMAP as my IMAP mail server, but the way it handles folders is a bit annoying (.FolderName/cur/ .FolderName/new/). Is this standard IMAP protocol, or do different servers handle this differently? Which other servers should I check out?

Re: IMAP Servers

2005-01-12 Thread Michael F. Sprague
W. Andrew Loe III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm currently using Courier-IMAP as my IMAP mail server, but the way it > handles folders is a bit annoying (.FolderName/cur/ .FolderName/new/). > Is this standard IMAP protocol, or do different servers handle this > differently? Which other servers

Re: IMAP Servers

2005-01-12 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2005-01-12 16:27:05, schrieb W. Andrew Loe III: > I'm currently using Courier-IMAP as my IMAP mail server, but the way it > handles folders is a bit annoying (.FolderName/cur/ .FolderName/new/). > Is this standard IMAP protocol, or do different servers handle this > differently? Which other s

Re: IMAP Servers

2005-01-12 Thread W. Andrew Loe III
Michael F. Sprague wrote: W. Andrew Loe III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm currently using Courier-IMAP as my IMAP mail server, but the way it handles folders is a bit annoying (.FolderName/cur/ .FolderName/new/). Is this standard IMAP protocol, or do different servers handle this differently

Re: IMAP Servers

2005-01-12 Thread Philipp Kern
On 13 Jan 2005, at 00:07, W. Andrew Loe III wrote: I'm sorry, I meant to refer to its implementation of Maildir. Is this the standard format? I had a lot of trouble getting this format to work well with Apple Mail. I'm pretty sure its Mail's issue as thunderbird works perfectly. Eh... I don't th

Re: IMAP Servers

2005-01-12 Thread Eric Jennings
On Jan 12, 2005, at 3:15 PM, Philipp Kern wrote: On 13 Jan 2005, at 00:07, W. Andrew Loe III wrote: I'm sorry, I meant to refer to its implementation of Maildir. Is this the standard format? I had a lot of trouble getting this format to work well with Apple Mail. I'm pretty sure its Mail's issue

Re: IMAP Servers

2005-01-12 Thread Mark Bucciarelli
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 18:34, Eric Jennings wrote: > We've experienced some issues with courier-imapd and Mail.app, > specifically where certain IMAP sub-Maildir mailboxes wouldn't display > within Mail.app. The mailboxes work great within Thunderbird. > > It's been infrequent enough where

Re: IMAP Servers

2005-01-12 Thread Ned Lukies
I do recall at one stage you had to create a symlink back to the base of the Maildir called INBOX for Mail.app to work: ln -s Maildir/ Maildir/.INBOX Hope that helps Ned > > We've experienced some issues with courier-imapd and Mail.app, > specifically where certain IMAP sub-Maildir mailboxes w