Hi Gilles ,
Unfortunately, I never did. The solution was to disable Hyperthreading
altogether unfortunately.
Perhaps others have had more luck?
- Original Message -
From: "gilles.hanotel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 16 June, 2004 5:13 AM
Subject: Re: Int
man, 14.06.2004 kl. 17.22 skrev Andreas John:
> Hello Adrian!
>
> NAT is only working with IPs "directly connected" to your ethernet card.
> or NAT-ed IPs not arbitrary ones.
>
> Or?
>
> rgds,
> j.
As NAT is done on the IP-layer, iptables doesn't care about ethernet and
other (MAC layer) stuff
Dear Gilles ,
I'll try as well... hope we can find a solution.
I have a few Redhat Linux 9 servers with Hyperthreading CPUs, and no
problem whatsoever. I think they run Apache 2, so maybe that is the
solution... but surely there must be people running Apache 1.x without any
problem and hyperthrea
Could someone please help educate this person.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No Longer Used!
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:53
From: "Geoffrey Faivre-Malloy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'll tell you once more because
Could someone please help educate this person.
You mean the "From:" header could be forged?! Dear Lord NO! Russell,
say it ain't so!
I personally like giving forwarding pointers in the 550 text. People
can read it, but machines ignore it. (Though I hear Exchange
suppresses multi-line 550 text,
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 15:49, Ward Willats <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Could someone please help educate this person.
>
> You mean the "From:" header could be forged?! Dear Lord NO! Russell,
> say it ain't so!
Some people haven't realised this yet.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Sec
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 09:18:07 +0800, Jason Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear Gilles ,
>
> I'll try as well... hope we can find a solution.
>
> I have a few Redhat Linux 9 servers with Hyperthreading CPUs, and no
> problem whatsoever. I think they run Apache 2, so maybe that is the
> solutio
An auto-responder has no way of knowing who or what emailed it. How can u
blame him for some spammer emailing it using ur address as a source? It
seems like the only recourse is to try to find out who or what was using ur
address and blow that person off the net.
At 02:52 PM 6/16/04 +1000, [EMAI
You could always tell him that he's just handing his new email address
out to all the spambots testing his old one. That might scare him
enough to turn the damn thing off.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris, here's a present for you --> yoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyoyo <--
Please use them in front of your 'u's, makes your messages so much
easier to read.
On Wednesday 16 June 2004 08.27, Chris Wagner wrote:
> An auto-responder has no way of knowing who or what emailed it.
You're saying...
Yes
How can u blame him for some spammer emailing it using ur address
as a source?
He is the responsible party for mail originated from the pduck.com domain.
The minute his auto-responder fired off incorrectly, he became a spammer.
When he ignored requests to stop, he became a _willful_ spammer.
This
Hi Gilles ,
Unfortunately, I never did. The solution was to disable Hyperthreading
altogether unfortunately.
Perhaps others have had more luck?
- Original Message -
From: "gilles.hanotel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, 16 June, 2004 5:13 AM
Subject: Re: Int
man, 14.06.2004 kl. 17.22 skrev Andreas John:
> Hello Adrian!
>
> NAT is only working with IPs "directly connected" to your ethernet card.
> or NAT-ed IPs not arbitrary ones.
>
> Or?
>
> rgds,
> j.
As NAT is done on the IP-layer, iptables doesn't care about ethernet and
other (MAC layer) stuff
Dear Gilles ,
I'll try as well... hope we can find a solution.
I have a few Redhat Linux 9 servers with Hyperthreading CPUs, and no
problem whatsoever. I think they run Apache 2, so maybe that is the
solution... but surely there must be people running Apache 1.x without any
problem and hyperthrea
Could someone please help educate this person.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No Longer Used!
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 11:53
From: "Geoffrey Faivre-Malloy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'll tell you once more because
15 matches
Mail list logo
